![]() |
Evo 8
Hi
I have a reference system in my 8: JL Audio XR650csi fronts JL Audio 12w6v2-D4 sub JL Audio TR600cxi rears JL Audio 300/4 powering front and rears JL Audio 500/1 sub amp Nak head The TRs in the rear are placeholders while I wait for some VR600cxis to arrive. Question is, considering the tonal balance of the rest of the system, would I be better opting for XR650s and has anyone fitted a 6.5 to the rear shelf? It would appear to require some metal cutting, any problems with this? |
Evo 8
I'd just leave the TR600s in there. It's only fill so the actual tonal
qualities don't come in to play. Paul Vina "Ben Robinson" wrote in message ... Hi I have a reference system in my 8: JL Audio XR650csi fronts JL Audio 12w6v2-D4 sub JL Audio TR600cxi rears JL Audio 300/4 powering front and rears JL Audio 500/1 sub amp Nak head The TRs in the rear are placeholders while I wait for some VR600cxis to arrive. Question is, considering the tonal balance of the rest of the system, would I be better opting for XR650s and has anyone fitted a 6.5 to the rear shelf? It would appear to require some metal cutting, any problems with this? |
Evo 8
"Ben Robinson" wrote in message ... Hi I have a system in my 8: The TRs in the rear are placeholders while I wait for some VR600cxis to arrive. Question is, considering the tonal balance of the rest of the system, would I be better opting for XR650s and has anyone fitted a 6.5 to the rear shelf? It would appear to require some metal cutting, any problems with this? To follow up, I decided to go with the XR650cxis and it really did make quite a difference. I know it's only backfill but it rewally did add to the sound, deeper bass generally, and the mid had better positioning. Ben |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk