![]() |
subwoofer parameters
what parameters determines the performance of a subwoofer? XMax is how much
the cone can move in and out?(bigger better) ; Fs - the lowest frequency (lower better?) ; SPL - higher better? |
subwoofer parameters
This may or may not be of help:
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq/rac-faq_4.html "Johan Wagener" wrote in message ... what parameters determines the performance of a subwoofer? XMax is how much the cone can move in and out?(bigger better) ; Fs - the lowest frequency (lower better?) ; SPL - higher better? |
subwoofer parameters
Xmax and power handling can be extracted from the overall groupof
parameters and interpreted that way, but as soon as you get into the other Thiele/Small parameters (Fs, Vas, Qts, etc.) you should really not try and extrapolate driver performance by looking at them individually or other than as a whole. People that have worked with driver parameters their whole lives may be able to shortcut some of the number crunching and judge performance differences by looking at only a few characteristics, but if you lack that experience do yourself a favor and plug ALL the numbers into one of the many free web-posted driver modeling programs, like WinISD etc. and let the software do the work. JD Johan Wagener wrote: what parameters determines the performance of a subwoofer? XMax is how much the cone can move in and out?(bigger better) ; Fs - the lowest frequency (lower better?) ; SPL - higher better? |
subwoofer parameters
"Johan Wagener" wrote in message ... what parameters determines the performance of a subwoofer? XMax is how much the cone can move in and out?(bigger better) Not necessarily. ; Fs - the lowest frequency (lower better?) ; Not necessarily. SPL - higher better? Definately NOT. Better sounds subs will always have a low SPL. |
subwoofer parameters
Not true. My IDMAX sounds awesome and gets stupid loud. So does the Adire
Brahma and the eD A-series. Paul Vina Definately NOT. Better sounds subs will always have a low SPL. |
subwoofer parameters
Sorry, but that is 100% not true... there are very good sounding
speakers in the world that have relatively high "SPL", i.e. sensitivity. Granted, driver designers sometimes sacrifice sensitivity to achieve lower Fs, or for other reasons, but it's never the only solution. JD Avanti wrote: "Johan Wagener" wrote in message ... what parameters determines the performance of a subwoofer? XMax is how much the cone can move in and out?(bigger better) Not necessarily. ; Fs - the lowest frequency (lower better?) ; Not necessarily. SPL - higher better? Definately NOT. Better sounds subs will always have a low SPL. |
subwoofer parameters
I think he was referring specifically to sensitivity, as rated in dB SPL
but either way it's not a true statement. JD Paul Vina wrote: Not true. My IDMAX sounds awesome and gets stupid loud. So does the Adire Brahma and the eD A-series. Paul Vina Definately NOT. Better sounds subs will always have a low SPL. |
subwoofer parameters
the dBW can sometimes be used, I know it is in home audio, but enclosure and cars have the biggest affect on sound next to parameters
"John Durbin" wrote in message ... I think he was referring specifically to sensitivity, as rated in dB SPL but either way it's not a true statement. JD Paul Vina wrote: Not true. My IDMAX sounds awesome and gets stupid loud. So does the Adire Brahma and the eD A-series. Paul Vina Definately NOT. Better sounds subs will always have a low SPL. |
subwoofer parameters
"Paul Vina" wrote in message news:cwFPb.99044$sv6.411357@attbi_s52... Not true. My IDMAX sounds awesome and gets stupid loud. So does the Adire Brahma and the eD A-series. Any speaker gets loud, if you want high fidelity sound then a speaker with a lower dB/W will usually be the better sounding one, all other factors being equal, also you will find the lower SPL speaker will work better than the higher one in a smaller box, obviously you do not beleive me and I don't give a hoot, but you may believe JL, they have or certainley used to have a good explanation as to why on their website. Question how come the better quality subs have lower spl/w than the el cheapo versions, ie JL, Infinity ZR- Apline, DLS, Kicker vs Pine lower cost Kenwood Pioneer, Jet Sound etc.... |
subwoofer parameters
"Avanti" wrote in message ... "Paul Vina" wrote in message news:cwFPb.99044$sv6.411357@attbi_s52... Not true. My IDMAX sounds awesome and gets stupid loud. So does the Adire Brahma and the eD A-series. Any speaker gets loud, if you want high fidelity sound then a speaker with a lower dB/W will usually be the better sounding one, all other factors being equal, also you will find the lower SPL speaker will work better than the higher one in a smaller box, Further to the above, the SPL is usually measured at 1khz, far above the frequency you want pumping through your subwoofer. |
subwoofer parameters
Any speaker gets loud, if you want high fidelity sound then a speaker with
a lower dB/W will usually be the better sounding one, all other factors being equal, Explain. also you will find the lower SPL speaker will work better than the higher one in a smaller box, May. But that's the result of the smaller box moreso than the driver itself. obviously you do not beleive me and I don't give a hoot, but you may believe JL, they have or certainley used to have a good explanation as to why on their website. This newsgroup frequently requires that people who make assertions back them up with evidence if anyone is to believe what they say. I wouldn't expect anyone to believe what I say if I don't provide evidence, nor should they. You've always backed up what you've said in the past (unlike certain other people). So don't take Paul's rebuttal as an attack. Question how come the better quality subs have lower spl/w than the el cheapo versions, ie JL, Infinity ZR- Apline, DLS, Kicker vs Pine lower cost Kenwood Pioneer, Jet Sound etc.... This isn't always true. I can think of several that don't. |
subwoofer parameters
"Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... Any speaker gets loud, if you want high fidelity sound then a speaker with a lower dB/W will usually be the better sounding one, all other factors being equal, Explain. SQ and volume are not the same, more SPL/W will usually indicate that the freq response for the driver is not 'flat'. also you will find the lower SPL speaker will work better than the higher one in a smaller box, May. But that's the result of the smaller box moreso than the driver itself. Not quite so. obviously you do not beleive me and I don't give a hoot, but you may believe JL, they have or certainley used to have a good explanation as to why on their website. This newsgroup frequently requires that people who make assertions back them up with evidence if anyone is to believe what they say. I wouldn't expect anyone to believe what I say if I don't provide evidence, nor should they. You've always backed up what you've said in the past (unlike certain other people). So don't take Paul's rebuttal as an attack. Who said I took it as an attack? Like I say see the JL website there is independant evidence, after all you should also remember JL is not I sub I would choose myself.... Question how come the better quality subs have lower spl/w than the el cheapo versions, ie JL, Infinity ZR- Apline, DLS, Kicker vs Pine lower cost Kenwood Pioneer, Jet Sound etc.... This isn't always true. I can think of several that don't. Yet you do not provide the eveidence that you have just chastised me for. |
subwoofer parameters
Any speaker gets loud, if you want high fidelity sound then a speaker
with a lower dB/W will usually be the better sounding one, all other factors being equal, Explain. SQ and volume are not the same, more SPL/W will usually indicate that the freq response for the driver is not 'flat'. a) this isn't always true; b) "flat" is not necessarily the same thing as "sounding good". obviously you do not beleive me and I don't give a hoot, but you may believe JL, they have or certainley used to have a good explanation as to why on their website. This newsgroup frequently requires that people who make assertions back them up with evidence if anyone is to believe what they say. I wouldn't expect anyone to believe what I say if I don't provide evidence, nor should they. You've always backed up what you've said in the past (unlike certain other people). So don't take Paul's rebuttal as an attack. Who said I took it as an attack? Like I say see the JL website there is independant evidence, after all you should also remember JL is not I sub I would choose myself.... Well, we've already proven several things on that JL tutorial site wrong, so it's already lost a great deal of credibility. But I'm willing to judge it by its merits. What article were you referring to? Question how come the better quality subs have lower spl/w than the el cheapo versions, ie JL, Infinity ZR- Apline, DLS, Kicker vs Pine lower cost Kenwood Pioneer, Jet Sound etc.... This isn't always true. I can think of several that don't. Yet you do not provide the eveidence that you have just chastised me for. You didn't ask. Begin with Peerless. I don't know of very meany sensitivities off the top of my head, so if you want more I can dig it up for you. |
subwoofer parameters
"Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... Any speaker gets loud, if you want high fidelity sound then a speaker with a lower dB/W will usually be the better sounding one, all other factors being equal, Explain. SQ and volume are not the same, more SPL/W will usually indicate that the freq response for the driver is not 'flat'. a) this isn't always true; b) "flat" is not necessarily the same thing as "sounding good". obviously you do not beleive me and I don't give a hoot, but you may believe JL, they have or certainley used to have a good explanation as to why on their website. This newsgroup frequently requires that people who make assertions back them up with evidence if anyone is to believe what they say. I wouldn't expect anyone to believe what I say if I don't provide evidence, nor should they. Well, we've already proven several things on that JL tutorial site wrong, so it's already lost a great deal of credibility. But I'm willing to judge it by its merits. What article were you referring to? IIRC http://www.jlaudio.com/tutorials/index.html There was a long article about speaker sensitivity and box sizes. Question how come the better quality subs have lower spl/w than the el cheapo versions, ie JL, Infinity ZR- Apline, DLS, Kicker vs Pine lower cost Kenwood Pioneer, Jet Sound etc.... This isn't always true. I can think of several that don't. Please do tell. |
subwoofer parameters
"Avanti" wrote in message
... "Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... Any speaker gets loud, if you want high fidelity sound then a speaker with a lower dB/W will usually be the better sounding one, all other factors being equal, Explain. SQ and volume are not the same, more SPL/W will usually indicate that the freq response for the driver is not 'flat'. a) this isn't always true; b) "flat" is not necessarily the same thing as "sounding good". obviously you do not beleive me and I don't give a hoot, but you may believe JL, they have or certainley used to have a good explanation as to why on their website. This newsgroup frequently requires that people who make assertions back them up with evidence if anyone is to believe what they say. I wouldn't expect anyone to believe what I say if I don't provide evidence, nor should they. Well, we've already proven several things on that JL tutorial site wrong, so it's already lost a great deal of credibility. But I'm willing to judge it by its merits. What article were you referring to? IIRC http://www.jlaudio.com/tutorials/index.html There was a long article about speaker sensitivity and box sizes. Question how come the better quality subs have lower spl/w than the el cheapo versions, ie JL, Infinity ZR- Apline, DLS, Kicker vs Pine lower cost Kenwood Pioneer, Jet Sound etc.... This isn't always true. I can think of several that don't. Please do tell. for your last question Usd and Velodyne have high sensitivity subs, and no better example than Strokers like 95-99 for the three models. |
subwoofer parameters
"Tha Ghee" wrote in message ... "Avanti" wrote in message ... Please do tell. for your last question Usd Haven't heard of those. and Velodyne have high sensitivity subs, and no better example than Strokers like 95-99 for the three models. The next 2 I have not read anywhere that they are reknowed for their sonic quality abilities,the Strokers are sold on producing pure SPL. However it looks like we will have to agree to differ as when it comes to spending my money I will go for the sub with 89dB/W or less over and above one that is higher, since from my time of building enclosures I remember which ones always sound 'proper'. |
subwoofer parameters
and Velodyne have high sensitivity subs, and no
better example than Strokers like 95-99 for the three models. The next 2 I have not read anywhere that they are reknowed for their sonic quality abilities,the Strokers are sold on producing pure SPL. And what are the Velodynes known for? However it looks like we will have to agree to differ as when it comes to spending my money I will go for the sub with 89dB/W or less over and above one that is higher, since from my time of building enclosures I remember which ones always sound 'proper'. What's the relation between sensitivity and "proper"? How does lower mean better? What mechanism is responsible? |
subwoofer parameters
"Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... What's the relation between sensitivity and "proper"? Nothing , only that I rememeber a bass driver with a light uncontrolled cone will be peaky in the freq response, distort easier under higher power inputs and as a natural coincidence have an above 90dB/W sensitivty. I must have just been real unlucky in the drivers that I have come across. How does lower mean better? Who said it did unless you are reffering to sensitivty then see above. What mechanism is responsible? I don't know, but now how about you responding to the original posters query? Perhaps he can then decide for himself which path he wishes to follow after all neither of us have anything to gain or lose. |
subwoofer parameters
What's the relation between sensitivity and "proper"? Nothing , only
that I rememeber a bass driver with a light uncontrolled cone will be peaky in the freq response, distort easier under higher power inputs and as a natural coincidence have an above 90dB/W sensitivty. Why are you assuming that high sensitivities require a "light uncontrolled cone"? I don't know, but now how about you responding to the original posters query? Perhaps he can then decide for himself which path he wishes to follow after all neither of us have anything to gain or lose. I already responded. |
subwoofer parameters
"Avanti" wrote in message ... "Tha Ghee" wrote in message ... "Avanti" wrote in message ... Please do tell. for your last question Usd Haven't heard of those. and Velodyne have high sensitivity subs, and no better example than Strokers like 95-99 for the three models. The next 2 I have not read anywhere that they are reknowed for their sonic quality abilities,the Strokers are sold on producing pure SPL. However it looks like we will have to agree to differ as when it comes to spending my money I will go for the sub with 89dB/W or less over and above one that is higher, since from my time of building enclosures I remember which ones always sound 'proper'. Usd are some great subs, check them out. Velodyne are servo controlled subs check them out. |
subwoofer parameters
"Tha Ghee" wrote in message ... [snip] Usd are some great subs, check them out. I just had a look and paid great attention to the SPL/W USD Y-210 10" Subwoofer Model Y-210/4 Y-210/4d Y-210/6d Re Ohm 3.2 6.4 / 1.6 8.8 / 2.2 Vas 27.9 27.8 27.9 Fs Hz 32.1 34.6 33.9 Qts 0.37 0.42 0.50 Qes 0.39 0.46 0.55 Qms 5.84 5.72 5.94 Sd cm2 310 310 310 SPLo 87.4 dB 87.5 dB 87.4 dB Couldn't disagree looking at the spec I would expext them to sound good in the correct enviroment. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk