
July 2nd 03, 08:17 AM
posted to uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.audio
|
|
RFD: uk.rec.audio.vinyl
Chesney Christ wrote in news:vOBVRuLFieA
:
A certain MrBitsy, of uk.rec.audio "fame", writes :
Sure it can, depending on what you mean by 'better'. Is a medium with
a hundred times more distortion and a noise floor 20 times higher
than
a competing medium, 'better' in any meaningful sense?
I listened to the Trout Quintet on vinyl last night. I had goosbumps at
some points, and was smiling at others.
I will not get into the debate again. But the question of whether or
not
any one person had goosebumps while listening to music or not is hardly
of any relevance. I get goosebumps listening to great music on CD all
the time. Hell, even a grotty old tape recording will do it for me. The
important thing is whether or not it is a special, involving piece of
music.
I enjoyed both but in my opinion the vinyl ****ed all over the CD.
But they were two completely different works. That is hardly a basis
for
comparison.
I have been with my wife for 23 years. She is slim, and in my view,
attractive - she has no problem at all in 'raising' my interest
whenever
she wants ;-). If I were to take her to the Pinkerton modelling agency,
she would not get through the front door. Pinkerton would moan about
'cheekbone' this and 'curve' that, before politely (i'm sure) show us
the
door.
That is a daft argument. People see different things in different
people.
It isn't and its exactly why the vinyl group is required. I want to be
able to express my satisfaction in a perticulare piece of music without
have to read a debate on the use of the word 'better'. CD is better by
the numbers. Vinyl is better by the sound.
I listen to both and enjoy both but vinyl is better for me.
MrBitsy.
|

July 2nd 03, 10:03 AM
posted to uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.audio
|
|
RFD: uk.rec.audio.vinyl
In article . 39,
MrBitsy wrote:
It isn't and its exactly why the vinyl group is required. I want to be
able to express my satisfaction in a perticulare piece of music without
have to read a debate on the use of the word 'better'. CD is better by
the numbers. Vinyl is better by the sound.
Think you'll soon get tired of patting one another on the back...
--
*Why can't women put on mascara with their mouth closed?
Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn
|

July 2nd 03, 04:47 PM
posted to uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.audio
|
|
RFD: uk.rec.audio.vinyl
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 11:03:41 +0100, Dave Plowman
wrote:
In article . 39,
MrBitsy wrote:
It isn't and its exactly why the vinyl group is required. I want to be
able to express my satisfaction in a perticulare piece of music without
have to read a debate on the use of the word 'better'. CD is better by
the numbers. Vinyl is better by the sound.
Think you'll soon get tired of patting one another on the back...
Oh, I dunno - think of all the wonderful fights over solid vs
suspended chassis, MC vs MM, belt-drive vs DD, pivoted vs parallel
arms, unipivots vs gimbals, elliptical vs line-contact etc etc.......
It should get down and dirty in no time! :-)
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
|

July 2nd 03, 05:04 PM
posted to uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.audio
|
|
RFD: uk.rec.audio.vinyl
Message-ID: from Stewart Pinkerton
contained the following:
Oh, I dunno - think of all the wonderful fights over solid vs
suspended chassis, MC vs MM, belt-drive vs DD, pivoted vs parallel
arms, unipivots vs gimbals, elliptical vs line-contact etc etc.......
Don't forget 'monster cable'. Never could quite figure out how the
transmission of just a few watts would require cable capable of delivering
power to a small factory but there you go.
--
Geoff Berrow
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
|

July 2nd 03, 09:33 PM
posted to uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.audio
|
|
RFD: uk.rec.audio.vinyl
In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
Think you'll soon get tired of patting one another on the back...
Oh, I dunno - think of all the wonderful fights over solid vs
suspended chassis, MC vs MM, belt-drive vs DD, pivoted vs parallel
arms, unipivots vs gimbals, elliptical vs line-contact etc etc.......
It should get down and dirty in no time! :-)
Pity then they didn't discuss such things on here as they are still of
interest.
--
*Pride is what we have. Vanity is what others have.
Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn
|

July 2nd 03, 04:47 PM
posted to uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.audio
|
|
RFD: uk.rec.audio.vinyl
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 08:17:15 GMT, MrBitsy
wrote:
CD is better by
the numbers. Vinyl is better by the sound.
In your humble opinion, of course....
I'm in the lucky position of having it both ways! :-)
I listen to both and enjoy both but vinyl is better for me.
One man's vice is another man's versa.............
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
|

July 2nd 03, 07:22 PM
posted to uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.audio
|
|
RFD: uk.rec.audio.vinyl
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:47:36 GMT, Stewart Pinkerton
wrote:
One man's vice is another man's versa.............
Ooh, that one I will pinch as a .sig line if you don't object!
Chris C
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|