A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old January 1st 04, 11:43 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

"Laurence Payne" wrote in
message

Bass response can be forced out of a small box, but creates a very
nasty and tiring sound (cf the Bose "Wave" boxes. Appealing on first
hearing, but you soon get tired of listening to a single bass
frequency).


Just because Bose blew it, doesn't mean that someone else can't do it right.
I was speaking with a designer about efforts to get large amounts of clean
40 Hz bass out of a 1-gallon enclosure. I think he's going to do it!



  #12 (permalink)  
Old January 4th 04, 11:53 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
RPS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

Laurence Payne wrote:

Good audio doesn't come in such small packages, I'm afraid :-)
...
Get a cheap clock-radio. You can survive listening to the content,
not the hi-fi, particularly when your head is buried in a pillow.


Let me frame the question as follows: We need a cd clock radio. Because
of the space limitation, it needs to be of the size of a clock radio,
not boombox or mini-systems. Who offers the best audio quality within
those limitations?

Bose is too expensive (500) for what it sounds like. I am intrigued by
Cambridge Audio unit (250?) but haven't heard it. Sony is an ok option
at 100 but not great.

Tivoli has a good radio, Boston a good clock radio, but neither has a
decent CD clock radio.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old January 4th 04, 11:53 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
RPS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

Laurence Payne wrote:

Good audio doesn't come in such small packages, I'm afraid :-)
...
Get a cheap clock-radio. You can survive listening to the content,
not the hi-fi, particularly when your head is buried in a pillow.


Let me frame the question as follows: We need a cd clock radio. Because
of the space limitation, it needs to be of the size of a clock radio,
not boombox or mini-systems. Who offers the best audio quality within
those limitations?

Bose is too expensive (500) for what it sounds like. I am intrigued by
Cambridge Audio unit (250?) but haven't heard it. Sony is an ok option
at 100 but not great.

Tivoli has a good radio, Boston a good clock radio, but neither has a
decent CD clock radio.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old January 5th 04, 11:34 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Laurence Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 300
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:53:37 GMT, RPS wrote:

Let me frame the question as follows: We need a cd clock radio. Because
of the space limitation, it needs to be of the size of a clock radio,
not boombox or mini-systems. Who offers the best audio quality within
those limitations?

Bose is too expensive (500) for what it sounds like. I am intrigued by
Cambridge Audio unit (250?) but haven't heard it. Sony is an ok option
at 100 but not great.

Tivoli has a good radio, Boston a good clock radio, but neither has a
decent CD clock radio.


So use a cheap clock radio to wake you, get up if you want to hear
hi-fi.

If you're awake enough to appreciate quality audio, why are you lying
in bed? :-)
  #15 (permalink)  
Old January 5th 04, 11:34 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Laurence Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 300
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:53:37 GMT, RPS wrote:

Let me frame the question as follows: We need a cd clock radio. Because
of the space limitation, it needs to be of the size of a clock radio,
not boombox or mini-systems. Who offers the best audio quality within
those limitations?

Bose is too expensive (500) for what it sounds like. I am intrigued by
Cambridge Audio unit (250?) but haven't heard it. Sony is an ok option
at 100 but not great.

Tivoli has a good radio, Boston a good clock radio, but neither has a
decent CD clock radio.


So use a cheap clock radio to wake you, get up if you want to hear
hi-fi.

If you're awake enough to appreciate quality audio, why are you lying
in bed? :-)
  #16 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 04, 03:23 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
RPS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

Laurence Payne wrote:

So use a cheap clock radio to wake you, get up if you want to hear
hi-fi.


The way I am approaching it is: If I am going to get a clock radio, may
as well get the best sound for my money. That's all I am seeking.

If you're awake enough to appreciate quality audio, why are you
lying in bed? :-)


I think you are on to something here---why I am lying in bed when I
could be up and about---but this is no longer audio territory. :-)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 04, 03:23 AM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
RPS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

Laurence Payne wrote:

So use a cheap clock radio to wake you, get up if you want to hear
hi-fi.


The way I am approaching it is: If I am going to get a clock radio, may
as well get the best sound for my money. That's all I am seeking.

If you're awake enough to appreciate quality audio, why are you
lying in bed? :-)


I think you are on to something here---why I am lying in bed when I
could be up and about---but this is no longer audio territory. :-)
  #18 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 04, 01:18 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Laurence Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 300
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:23:56 GMT, RPS wrote:

So use a cheap clock radio to wake you, get up if you want to hear
hi-fi.


The way I am approaching it is: If I am going to get a clock radio, may
as well get the best sound for my money. That's all I am seeking.


To make a serious point:

My alarm clock/radio for many years was a portable radio, with a
front-mounted hf speaker and a side-mounted bass unit. This second
speaker was switchable. With it on, the sound was definitely
"better". But, for my purposes, which included setting the radio to
a 30-minute switch-off as I prepared for sleep, it was a nuisance.
With it the sound was annoyingly intrusive.

"Hi-fi" actually turned out to be a negative factor in the special
contest of a bedside clock-radio !
  #19 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 04, 01:18 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Laurence Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 300
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:23:56 GMT, RPS wrote:

So use a cheap clock radio to wake you, get up if you want to hear
hi-fi.


The way I am approaching it is: If I am going to get a clock radio, may
as well get the best sound for my money. That's all I am seeking.


To make a serious point:

My alarm clock/radio for many years was a portable radio, with a
front-mounted hf speaker and a side-mounted bass unit. This second
speaker was switchable. With it on, the sound was definitely
"better". But, for my purposes, which included setting the radio to
a 30-minute switch-off as I prepared for sleep, it was a nuisance.
With it the sound was annoyingly intrusive.

"Hi-fi" actually turned out to be a negative factor in the special
contest of a bedside clock-radio !
  #20 (permalink)  
Old January 6th 04, 05:18 PM posted to rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
Joseph Oberlander
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Audio quality "CD Clock Radio"

Laurence Payne wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:23:56 GMT, RPS wrote:


So use a cheap clock radio to wake you, get up if you want to hear
hi-fi.


The way I am approaching it is: If I am going to get a clock radio, may
as well get the best sound for my money. That's all I am seeking.



To make a serious point:

My alarm clock/radio for many years was a portable radio, with a
front-mounted hf speaker and a side-mounted bass unit. This second
speaker was switchable. With it on, the sound was definitely
"better". But, for my purposes, which included setting the radio to
a 30-minute switch-off as I prepared for sleep, it was a nuisance.
With it the sound was annoyingly intrusive.

"Hi-fi" actually turned out to be a negative factor in the special
contest of a bedside clock-radio !


Mine for years was...

A switching box. I found this neat electronic power strip/switchbox
with a timer and clock in it for about $100 15 years ago(died 5 years
later in an earthquake ). It would even turn on banks in series
a second apart so as to not blow the breaker. Set the time and presto -
stereo turned on at the same time every morning.

It was silver and about the size of a CD player/tape deck - fit in the
stereo rack. Not merely an outlet strip.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tegory=14 978
Mine was silver, but simmilar. Neat toy.

http://djsoucek.webpark.cz/a_pioneer_dt_530.htm
http://djsoucek.webpark.cz/a_pioneer_dt_500.htm(nice picture)
IIRC, mine was something like this. I don't know if these type of devices
are still made, but they are far better an alternative than a clock radio.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.