![]() |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
Form@C wrote:
I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif -- Nick |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote:
Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif I *could*, but I rather like the look of something like this: http://digilander.libero.it/essentia...ybrid_home.htm 'cos I suspect it has more chance of *really* sounding good, rather than being based around a chip being used for other than its designed purpose! (ducks down behind 0.2C/W heatsinks to hide from gaincloners hurling flaming 1000uF capacitors...) :-) -- Mick http://www.nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini information Also at http://www.mixtel.co.uk where the collection started. Currently deserting M$ for linux... :-) |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote:
Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif I *could*, but I rather like the look of something like this: http://digilander.libero.it/essentia...ybrid_home.htm 'cos I suspect it has more chance of *really* sounding good, rather than being based around a chip being used for other than its designed purpose! (ducks down behind 0.2C/W heatsinks to hide from gaincloners hurling flaming 1000uF capacitors...) :-) -- Mick http://www.nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini information Also at http://www.mixtel.co.uk where the collection started. Currently deserting M$ for linux... :-) |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
Form@C wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote: Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif I *could*, but I rather like the look of something like this: http://digilander.libero.it/essentia...ybrid_home.htm 'cos I suspect it has more chance of *really* sounding good, rather than being based around a chip being used for other than its designed purpose! (ducks down behind 0.2C/W heatsinks to hide from gaincloners hurling flaming 1000uF capacitors...) :-) Well you could try this then http://www.petemoore.pwp.blueyonder....rschematic.jpg I didn't see the need as the one I built was being fed by a valve stage anyway. They are fun things, I was quite shocked just how good they are for £30. Of course you could go to the other extreme. http://www.lurcher.org/nick/audio/vi...ul/v4212-1.jpg :-) -- Nick |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
Form@C wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote: Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif I *could*, but I rather like the look of something like this: http://digilander.libero.it/essentia...ybrid_home.htm 'cos I suspect it has more chance of *really* sounding good, rather than being based around a chip being used for other than its designed purpose! (ducks down behind 0.2C/W heatsinks to hide from gaincloners hurling flaming 1000uF capacitors...) :-) Well you could try this then http://www.petemoore.pwp.blueyonder....rschematic.jpg I didn't see the need as the one I built was being fed by a valve stage anyway. They are fun things, I was quite shocked just how good they are for £30. Of course you could go to the other extreme. http://www.lurcher.org/nick/audio/vi...ul/v4212-1.jpg :-) -- Nick |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
Form@C wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote: Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif Strange design. Linear taper volume control, only 1000uF supply smoothing for a chip than can output 56 watts and why throw away all the loudspeaker damping by inserting a series resistor? And if it is a phones amp why use such a meaty chip? Ian |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
Form@C wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote: Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif Strange design. Linear taper volume control, only 1000uF supply smoothing for a chip than can output 56 watts and why throw away all the loudspeaker damping by inserting a series resistor? And if it is a phones amp why use such a meaty chip? Ian |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
Ian Bell wrote:
Form@C wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote: Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif Strange design. Linear taper volume control, only 1000uF supply smoothing for a chip than can output 56 watts and why throw away all the loudspeaker damping by inserting a series resistor? And if it is a phones amp why use such a meaty chip? Ian The original post said "not enough output (yet!) for speakers" so it wasn't a suggestion for a headphone amp. The lin pot is used as its in the feedback loop, and in conjunction with the next R provides a log (ish) response. The 1000uf, is because they sound better with less cap's, the design is all about speed, and bigger caps seem to produce a more sluggish result. The R22 is because no one trusts these amps at first to connect to their speakers. Its not just a bad design, its all done for a reason, maybe not a normal or even good reason, but a reason never the less. -- Nick |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
Ian Bell wrote:
Form@C wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:35:41 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote: Form@C wrote: I'm just experimenting with a source-follower single-ended MOSFET headphone amp, with an op-amp voltage gain stage. Its rather good but not enough output (yet!) for speakers. :-) You could always try a gainclone http://home.student.utwente.nl/f.s.b...rtedLM3875.gif Strange design. Linear taper volume control, only 1000uF supply smoothing for a chip than can output 56 watts and why throw away all the loudspeaker damping by inserting a series resistor? And if it is a phones amp why use such a meaty chip? Ian The original post said "not enough output (yet!) for speakers" so it wasn't a suggestion for a headphone amp. The lin pot is used as its in the feedback loop, and in conjunction with the next R provides a log (ish) response. The 1000uf, is because they sound better with less cap's, the design is all about speed, and bigger caps seem to produce a more sluggish result. The R22 is because no one trusts these amps at first to connect to their speakers. Its not just a bad design, its all done for a reason, maybe not a normal or even good reason, but a reason never the less. -- Nick |
Troubleshooting: amplifier Musical Fidelity A1
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:34:40 +0000, Nick Gorham wrote:
snip Well you could try this then http://www.petemoore.pwp.blueyonder....rschematic.jpg I didn't see the need as the one I built was being fed by a valve stage anyway. They are fun things, I was quite shocked just how good they are for £30. Of course you could go to the other extreme. Now - there's an idea.... :-) http://www.lurcher.org/nick/audio/vi...ul/v4212-1.jpg :-) I'm *really* jealous now... I've always wanted a pair of 211s to play with! (with the appropriate ironmongery that is!). :-) That's a hell of a setup! (plus obligatory !!!!!! courtesy of ebay) I particularly like the king-size timber & ply chassis system.... -- Mick http://www.nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini information Also at http://www.mixtel.co.uk where the collection started. Currently deserting M$ for linux... :-) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk