![]() |
|
CD recorder update.
"Julian Fowler" wrote in message
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:31:13 +0000, Laurence Payne wrote: On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:04:00 -0000, "Informer" wrote: Did you try simply copying it as data? No only tried Audio CD Anyway the deed is done now, sometimes simple solutions are best when technology has defeated me! The simple solution may have been to simply copy the cd in it's entirety as data, not try to rip the tracks then reconstruct an audio cd, as I suspect you may have done. ???? I think this would be what I call an image copy. It's what the full disc copy facilities of most commercial burning programs (Nero, EZ-CD) do with audio or data discs. Copying an audio CD as data is one of the sure ways of *not* getting an accurate copy. I see a bit of a communications break down. I fail to see why the following is so difficult: - use EAC, in secure mode, to extract audio data from CD to .wav files on HDD Agreed. Been there done that many times and it worked stunningly well. - use EAC or CDRWIN or Nero or Feurio or (insert your preferred mastering program now) to burn an audio disc from the extracted .wav files Agreed. Been there done that many times and it worked stunningly well. I've even done it with EZ-CD and CoolEdit Pro. However, I ,might call this "copying an audio CD as data". The advantage of ripping separate tracks is the ability to do compendiums of multiple discs. That means mixing and matching tracks from different CDs, including producing CDs that are actually close to full with more like full 80 minutes of music instead of the usual 30 or so minutes. The advantage of image copies is that its the simplest way to handle a real world disc that might be DAO or TAO or even a functional hybrid of the two, and might even have some data tossed in ("Multimedia content"). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk