![]() |
My subwoofer really worked!
I've had subwoofers before, but I have always had to turn them off for
music, because they sound so dreadful. I know why this is - the bass reflex design is so flabby that the whole thing just honks instead of reproducing bass. The old test really showed this up; listening from a distant part of the house, and hearing the booming of particular bass notes. So I decided to build my own, using a disused cupboard built under some stairs. This is of brick construction and as solid as anything. It is also about 80 cubic feet in volume. Having looked around for drivers and finally got to the Adire Tempest (thank you Stewart) I could see that this speaker, with its massive Vas would really benefit from a sealed enclosure - which at 80 cubic feet amounts to an infinite baffle. Well it is finally built, and today I have been tuning it in to the rest of the system. Easy! Got the polarity right, adjusted the cutoff to 60Hz and set the level. It has blended in with the Sonus Fabers so seamlessly that it is hard to tell when it is on, apart from the fact that there are several new octaves available. There are no resonant lumps to go boom and best of all, it doesn't sound even remotely like an audio system with a subwoofer (it still does the business on movie sound of course). Time for all to get building - a big infinite baffle sub will be a revelation for those who hate the normal beasts as much as me. d _____________________________ http://www.pearce.uk.com |
My subwoofer really worked!
In message , Don Pearce
writes I've had subwoofers before, but I have always had to turn them off for music, because they sound so dreadful. I know why this is - the bass reflex design is so flabby that the whole thing just honks instead of reproducing bass. The old test really showed this up; listening from a distant part of the house, and hearing the booming of particular bass notes. So I decided to build my own, using a disused cupboard built under some stairs. This is of brick construction and as solid as anything. It is also about 80 cubic feet in volume. Having looked around for drivers and finally got to the Adire Tempest (thank you Stewart) I could see that this speaker, with its massive Vas would really benefit from a sealed enclosure - which at 80 cubic feet amounts to an infinite baffle. Well it is finally built, and today I have been tuning it in to the rest of the system. Easy! Got the polarity right, adjusted the cutoff to 60Hz and set the level. It has blended in with the Sonus Fabers so seamlessly that it is hard to tell when it is on, apart from the fact that there are several new octaves available. There are no resonant lumps to go boom and best of all, it doesn't sound even remotely like an audio system with a subwoofer (it still does the business on movie sound of course). Time for all to get building - a big infinite baffle sub will be a revelation for those who hate the normal beasts as much as me. Perhaps it's time for those of us in older houses to try the old 'disused chimney transmission line' concept again. -- Chris Morriss |
My subwoofer really worked!
Hi Don,
Very interesting post. In message , Don Pearce writes I've had subwoofers before, but I have always had to turn them off for music, because they sound so dreadful. I know why this is - the bass reflex design is so flabby that the whole thing just honks instead of reproducing bass. The old test really showed this up; listening from a distant part of the house, and hearing the booming of particular bass notes. This reflects my own experiences, to the point that I chose to live without one. So I decided to build my own, using a disused cupboard built under some stairs. This is of brick construction and as solid as anything. It is also about 80 cubic feet in volume. Having looked around for drivers and finally got to the Adire Tempest (thank you Stewart) I could see that this speaker, with its massive Vas would really benefit from a sealed enclosure - which at 80 cubic feet amounts to an infinite baffle. Is the volume of the enclosure (erm, cupboard) important, or does it simply have to be 'big enough'? I've looked at several of the web sites that discuss infinite baffle systems, and they seem long on 'case studies' but short on theory. I'm a dunce when it comes to cabinet design. Well it is finally built, and today I have been tuning it in to the rest of the system. Easy! Got the polarity right, adjusted the cutoff to 60Hz and set the level. It has blended in with the Sonus Fabers so seamlessly that it is hard to tell when it is on, apart from the fact that there are several new octaves available. Did you choose 60Hz empirically, or was there a bunch of maths involved? Time for all to get building - a big infinite baffle sub will be a revelation for those who hate the normal beasts as much as me. I'm _very_ tempted, but now I'm full of questions. What are you driving the Tempest with? What sort of crossover? Have you had to nail 2*4s around the window frames? Has your liver liquified? Enquiring minds (with under-stairs cupboards) want to know! -- Regards, Glenn Booth |
My subwoofer really worked!
Glenn Booth wrote:
Is the volume of the enclosure (erm, cupboard) important, or does it simply have to be 'big enough'? I've looked at several of the web sites that discuss infinite baffle systems, and they seem long on 'case studies' but short on theory. I'm a dunce when it comes to cabinet design. Download a copy of WinISD. It is free. It also gives a graphical display that shows the effects of different box sizes. The "right size" box has a bass roll-off of 12dB/octave. A much bigger box approaches 6dB/octave so has more output (than the first box) at very low frequencies but less output at higher frequencies. So you are probably better off using some of the cupboard for an enclosure and the rest to keep the vacuum cleaner in. -- Roger. |
My subwoofer really worked!
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:33:45 +0000, Glenn Booth
wrote: Hi Don, Very interesting post. In message , Don Pearce writes I've had subwoofers before, but I have always had to turn them off for music, because they sound so dreadful. I know why this is - the bass reflex design is so flabby that the whole thing just honks instead of reproducing bass. The old test really showed this up; listening from a distant part of the house, and hearing the booming of particular bass notes. This reflects my own experiences, to the point that I chose to live without one. So I decided to build my own, using a disused cupboard built under some stairs. This is of brick construction and as solid as anything. It is also about 80 cubic feet in volume. Having looked around for drivers and finally got to the Adire Tempest (thank you Stewart) I could see that this speaker, with its massive Vas would really benefit from a sealed enclosure - which at 80 cubic feet amounts to an infinite baffle. Is the volume of the enclosure (erm, cupboard) important, or does it simply have to be 'big enough'? I've looked at several of the web sites that discuss infinite baffle systems, and they seem long on 'case studies' but short on theory. I'm a dunce when it comes to cabinet design. Once the enclosure is a fair bit bigger than Vas, you get to a situation of diminishing returns by going bigger still. I have gone for the full cupboard size because it is so inconveniently placed as a cupboard that I may as well. Well it is finally built, and today I have been tuning it in to the rest of the system. Easy! Got the polarity right, adjusted the cutoff to 60Hz and set the level. It has blended in with the Sonus Fabers so seamlessly that it is hard to tell when it is on, apart from the fact that there are several new octaves available. Did you choose 60Hz empirically, or was there a bunch of maths involved? No maths, I just turned the frequency down until I couldn't hear the sub producing "normal" bass, and that was about 60Hz. Time for all to get building - a big infinite baffle sub will be a revelation for those who hate the normal beasts as much as me. I'm _very_ tempted, but now I'm full of questions. What are you driving the Tempest with? What sort of crossover? Have you had to nail 2*4s around the window frames? Has your liver liquified? Enquiring minds (with under-stairs cupboards) want to know! The driver is just the amplifier/filter panel stripped out of another subwoofer. It is about 200 watts, and has a variable filter for setting crossover frequency. As for my vitals - I don't go that loud living in London. The neighbours would talk. d _____________________________ http://www.pearce.uk.com |
My subwoofer really worked!
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:48:11 +0000, Chris Morriss
wrote: In message , Don Pearce writes I've had subwoofers before, but I have always had to turn them off for music, because they sound so dreadful. I know why this is - the bass reflex design is so flabby that the whole thing just honks instead of reproducing bass. The old test really showed this up; listening from a distant part of the house, and hearing the booming of particular bass notes. So I decided to build my own, using a disused cupboard built under some stairs. This is of brick construction and as solid as anything. It is also about 80 cubic feet in volume. Having looked around for drivers and finally got to the Adire Tempest (thank you Stewart) I could see that this speaker, with its massive Vas would really benefit from a sealed enclosure - which at 80 cubic feet amounts to an infinite baffle. Well it is finally built, and today I have been tuning it in to the rest of the system. Easy! Got the polarity right, adjusted the cutoff to 60Hz and set the level. It has blended in with the Sonus Fabers so seamlessly that it is hard to tell when it is on, apart from the fact that there are several new octaves available. There are no resonant lumps to go boom and best of all, it doesn't sound even remotely like an audio system with a subwoofer (it still does the business on movie sound of course). Time for all to get building - a big infinite baffle sub will be a revelation for those who hate the normal beasts as much as me. Perhaps it's time for those of us in older houses to try the old 'disused chimney transmission line' concept again. Just watch out for the pigeons. d _____________________________ http://www.pearce.uk.com |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk