Question about Decca C4E phone cartridge
 

Can anyone provide me with specifications or information on the Decca C4E.
Is it a moving coil type? I have one that I'm going to sell. It appears to
be unused, as there is no visible wear @ X20 microscope magnification.

Gordon

Question about Decca C4E phone cartridge
 

In article Zv8Xb.27076$jk2.67959@attbi_s53,
Gordon wrote:
Can anyone provide me with specifications or information on the Decca
C4E. Is it a moving coil type? I have one that I'm going to sell. It
appears to be unused, as there is no visible wear @ X20 microscope
magnification.

Moving magnet, IIRC. Think I've got details of an SC4E somewhere - which
was the 'selected' version.

--
*A 'jiffy' is an actual unit of time for 1/100th of a second.

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

Question about Decca C4E phone cartridge
 

"Dave Plowman" wrote in message
...
In article Zv8Xb.27076$jk2.67959@attbi_s53,
Gordon wrote:
Can anyone provide me with specifications or information on the Decca
C4E. Is it a moving coil type? I have one that I'm going to sell. It
appears to be unused, as there is no visible wear @ X20 microscope
magnification.

Moving magnet, IIRC. Think I've got details of an SC4E somewhere - which
was the 'selected' version.

From the 1968/69 HiFi Yearbook :
FFSS Mk4 Cartridge C4E - Stereo/Mono cartridge. FR 20Hz - 20KHz (20Hz -
16KHz +/-2db). Separation as for Mk3. Output 5mv at 5cm/sec per channel.
Stylus 0.3 x 0.65 thou elliptical diamond. Pw 1 to 2.5 gm. Compliance 30 x
10(-6) lateral & 6 x 10(-6) vertical. Rec. load 50K. Output from each
channel balanced within 1db. Price UKP 18.3s.3d (plus UKP3.17s.9d PT)

Question about Decca C4E phone cartridge
 

Thanks for the info Dave.

Gordon
"Mike Coatham" wrote in message
...

"Dave Plowman" wrote in message
...
In article Zv8Xb.27076$jk2.67959@attbi_s53,
Gordon wrote:
Can anyone provide me with specifications or information on the Decca
C4E. Is it a moving coil type? I have one that I'm going to sell. It
appears to be unused, as there is no visible wear @ X20 microscope
magnification.

Moving magnet, IIRC. Think I've got details of an SC4E somewhere - which
was the 'selected' version.

From the 1968/69 HiFi Yearbook :
FFSS Mk4 Cartridge C4E - Stereo/Mono cartridge. FR 20Hz - 20KHz (20Hz -
16KHz +/-2db). Separation as for Mk3. Output 5mv at 5cm/sec per channel.
Stylus 0.3 x 0.65 thou elliptical diamond. Pw 1 to 2.5 gm. Compliance 30 x
10(-6) lateral & 6 x 10(-6) vertical. Rec. load 50K. Output from each
channel balanced within 1db. Price UKP 18.3s.3d (plus UKP3.17s.9d PT)

Question about Decca C4E phone cartridge
 

In article ,
Keith \Dingo Breath\ wrote:
Can anyone provide me with specifications or information on the Decca
C4E. Is it a moving coil type? I have one that I'm going to sell. It
appears to be unused, as there is no visible wear @ X20 microscope
magnification.

There's been a rather recent development (recent in geological time)
called compact discs. Look into it silly buggers.

Perhaps that's why he's selling it, pillock?

--
*A backward poet writes inverse.*

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn

Question about Decca C4E phone cartridge
 

Hey Dinko,
I was probably playing CD's before you were born, you stupid bugger.

"Keith "Dingo Breath"" wrote in message
...
"Gordon" wrote in
news:Zv8Xb.27076$jk2.67959@attbi_s53:

Can anyone provide me with specifications or information on the Decca
C4E. Is it a moving coil type? I have one that I'm going to sell. It
appears to be unused, as there is no visible wear @ X20 microscope
magnification.

There's been a rather recent development (recent in geological time)
called
compact discs. Look into it silly buggers.

Question about Decca C4E phone cartridge
 

Go play with your MP-3's!

"Keith "Dingo Breath" Garratt" wrote in message
...
"Gordon" wrote in news:myBXb.39901$uV3.71053
@attbi_s51:

Hey Dinko,
I was probably playing CD's before you were born, you stupid bugger.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Stupid? The humour here is that you're the one spending $$$ on 1920's
technology that delivers doubtful benefits. Sad git.