![]() |
|
Whacky driver mystery.....
Keith G wrote:
"malcolm" wrote Anyone ever seen the like? they are 'full range' drivers, the smaller central paper cone is a 'whizzer' Ah! Now you mention that also, that term is familiar. the driver prob is 40 - 50 hz to 16 -18 khz or similar, is the tweeter a piezo? if it is, then no crossover inside so a CLEAN sound. regards malcolm Unfortunately no, these speakers have a little paper tweeter about 2.5 inches Ø, see: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...ow/tweeter.jpg The bass cone looks thus: http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...w/basscone.jpg ok so full range bass/mid/low high plus a paper tweeter. -- ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ LED Headlamps and Sea Fishing UK http://www.geocities.com/malc_hurn http://www.geocities.com/malc_hurn/battlefield1942.html ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ |
Whacky driver mystery.....
Keith G wrote:
"Form@C" wrote Anyone ever seen the like? If you happen to like building valve amps too, these are probably just what you want. They should sound great as they are probably quite sensitive (those paper cones!). You don't get a flat frequency response, but they will probably sound very nice. It may be worth pairing them with more modern dome tweeters though as the cone types tend to be very directional. The extra cone is known as a "parasitic" cone and tends to add mid-upper mid response to the main cone. Sometimes they are "damped" with a foam ring on the outer edge to control its resonance. Very interesting. I'm with you entirely on the dome tweeters - in fact I've already swapped them for another pair off the pile - Wharfedale Laser 80s - which are a three-way design with domed tweeters. By contrast, they are immediately 'better defined' and have that 'freshness' and immediacy I expect with paper drivers. (Valve amplification, btw.) In fact, they are sounding very nice indeed atm and certainly don't smell so bad! The homebrews were definitely interesting and by no means unpleasant to listen to, but I can see now they sounded a tad 'veiled' by comparison. (Back in the garage now or FOC to anyone who wanted to collect them....) do you have a photo of the speakers, not just the drivers, would be interesting to see. regards malcolm -- ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ LED Headlamps and Sea Fishing UK http://www.geocities.com/malc_hurn http://www.geocities.com/malc_hurn/battlefield1942.html ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ ¸.·´¯`·.¸((((º.·´¯`·.¸ |
Whacky driver mystery.....
"malcolm" wrote The homebrews were definitely interesting and by no means unpleasant to listen to, but I can see now they sounded a tad 'veiled' by comparison. (Back in the garage now or FOC to anyone who wanted to collect them....) do you have a photo of the speakers, not just the drivers, would be interesting to see. regards malcolm Yup, certainly do. Full-on front view so you can't see the cobwebs, bleached veneer, crap or paint splashes on the boxes...... |
Whacky driver mystery.....
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "malcolm" wrote The homebrews were definitely interesting and by no means unpleasant to listen to, but I can see now they sounded a tad 'veiled' by comparison. (Back in the garage now or FOC to anyone who wanted to collect them....) do you have a photo of the speakers, not just the drivers, would be interesting to see. regards malcolm Yup, certainly do. Full-on front view so you can't see the cobwebs, bleached veneer, crap or paint splashes on the boxes...... Oops, the link would be handy, wouldn't it? http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...oldspeaker.jpg |
Whacky driver mystery.....
Keith G wrote:
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "malcolm" wrote The homebrews were definitely interesting and by no means unpleasant to listen to, but I can see now they sounded a tad 'veiled' by comparison. (Back in the garage now or FOC to anyone who wanted to collect them....) do you have a photo of the speakers, not just the drivers, would be interesting to see. regards malcolm Yup, certainly do. Full-on front view so you can't see the cobwebs, bleached veneer, crap or paint splashes on the boxes...... Oops, the link would be handy, wouldn't it? http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...oldspeaker.jpg Hmmm. Not the ones I had in mind. Your 'whizzer' is much bigger than mine. |
Whacky driver mystery.....
"Triffid" wrote do you have a photo of the speakers, not just the drivers, would be interesting to see. regards malcolm Yup, certainly do. Full-on front view so you can't see the cobwebs, bleached veneer, crap or paint splashes on the boxes...... Oops, the link would be handy, wouldn't it? http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/keit...oldspeaker.jpg Hmmm. Not the ones I had in mind. Your 'whizzer' is much bigger than mine. examines fingernails .......yersss, I've heard that said before....... :-) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk