![]() |
copy protected CDs
Hi,
I was just listening to a CD and noticed it had a "copy controlled" logo on it, so I thought I would stick it in my PC to see what happened. I cancelled the "do you want to install the software" dialog, then went into nero, selected 'save tracks to HD' and I was able to save the tracks to uncompressed WAV without any warnings or anything. Have I been incredibly devious here? I wasn't trying to defeat the copy protection, just watch it in action. FWIW the CD is called "urban flavas 2" on untouchables records (not to be confused with the unrelated "urban flavas" series on warner). The PC is running nero 5.5 express on windows 2000 server sp4 with a pioneer dvr-106d. Andy |
copy protected CDs
"Andy Fish" wrote in message ... Hi, I was just listening to a CD and noticed it had a "copy controlled" logo on it, so I thought I would stick it in my PC to see what happened. I cancelled the "do you want to install the software" dialog, then went into nero, selected 'save tracks to HD' and I was able to save the tracks to uncompressed WAV without any warnings or anything. Have I been incredibly devious here? I wasn't trying to defeat the copy protection, just watch it in action. FWIW the CD is called "urban flavas 2" on untouchables records (not to be confused with the unrelated "urban flavas" series on warner). The PC is running nero 5.5 express on windows 2000 server sp4 with a pioneer dvr-106d. It would appear as usual that so-called "copy protection" DOESN'T. Of course this most likely won't prevent the RIAA from screaming that "it's the pirates! The PIRATES!" -- Steve Goodman * Cartoons about DVDs and stuff * http://www.earthlight.net/HiddenTrack |
copy protected CDs
"Revd. Norle Enturbulata" wrote in message news:UJfdc.165$Kl.33@newsfe1-win... It would appear as usual that so-called "copy protection" DOESN'T. If however it does, CloneCD does the job. |
copy protected CDs
"Andy Fish" wrote in message ... Hi, Have I been incredibly devious here? I wasn't trying to defeat the copy protection, just watch it in action. My experience is that the copy protection doesn't work. All it achieves is making the CD unplayable on many (usually high end) CD players. However, if you rip the tracks ('cos the protection doen't work) and burn your own CD, that plays perfectly. Have a look at http://ukcdr.org/ for more blurb, including a list of "affected" CDs. Roy. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
copy protected CDs
"The Artist" wrote in message ... "Roy" emitted : Have I been incredibly devious here? I wasn't trying to defeat the copy protection, just watch it in action. My experience is that the copy protection doesn't work. All it achieves is making the CD unplayable on many (usually high end) CD players. However, if you rip the tracks ('cos the protection doen't work) and burn your own CD, that plays perfectly. Likewise. I have a couple of so-called protected discs that spit out glitches in my CD player, spoiling my enjoyment of the product. I backed them up in a few minutes and the backups play fine. This is wrong on so many levels! In what kind of paradoxical world does it make any sense to employ a copyright protection that necessitate the rightful owner to hack it? ****ing idiots.. My policy in software development is to use absolutely minimal protection. 60 seconds work to a cracker. The bottom line is if people intend to pay for something, they will.. I beleive that the copy protection works by somehow inducing spurious errors which confuse the error correcting circuitry. What would be really ironic would be if a copied version actually sounded better because the disk did not have these errors. I don't know if this is actually the case though |
copy protected CDs
I can confirm that is the case. Norah Jones Feels like Home will not play on a
top of the range DVD player my cousin has, but after I did a straight copy using Nero 6 the copy disc plays fine. Remember on the back of all your vinyl albums from the 70's "Home Taping is Killing Music" Then CD copying Was Killing Music Now Downloading is Killing Music Crap music at high prices is killing music. I still doubt the likes of Asda are selling them as loss leaders at £9.87 when the list price is 13-15 quid! and even that is expense when you can buy the of the net at £8.99 or less from the likes of CD-WOW and Play247 and they will deliver it to your door. Your got to wonder the brains of the folk at the BPI when their way to stop piracy was to try and make CD-WOW put UP the price of a CD. Now that is plan stupid. "Roy" rp wrote in message ... "Andy Fish" wrote in message ... Hi, Have I been incredibly devious here? I wasn't trying to defeat the copy protection, just watch it in action. My experience is that the copy protection doesn't work. All it achieves is making the CD unplayable on many (usually high end) CD players. However, if you rip the tracks ('cos the protection doen't work) and burn your own CD, that plays perfectly. Have a look at http://ukcdr.org/ for more blurb, including a list of "affected" CDs. Roy. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
copy protected CDs
"Woody" wrote in message
news:OErdc.13430$4N3.10592@newsfe1-win... "The Artist" wrote in message ... "Roy" emitted : Have I been incredibly devious here? I wasn't trying to defeat the copy protection, just watch it in action. My experience is that the copy protection doesn't work. All it achieves is making the CD unplayable on many (usually high end) CD players. However, if you rip the tracks ('cos the protection doen't work) and burn your own CD, that plays perfectly. Likewise. I have a couple of so-called protected discs that spit out glitches in my CD player, spoiling my enjoyment of the product. I backed them up in a few minutes and the backups play fine. This is wrong on so many levels! In what kind of paradoxical world does it make any sense to employ a copyright protection that necessitate the rightful owner to hack it? ****ing idiots.. My policy in software development is to use absolutely minimal protection. 60 seconds work to a cracker. The bottom line is if people intend to pay for something, they will.. -- S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t At the end of the day piracy would drop out of sight overnight if the greedy record companies marketed their products at a more acceptable price. It is widely known that on a full price CD the shop makes about £3, the artists gets about £1, and the disc costs about 98p to produce and bring to the shelf. Most of the rest of the cost is record company profit. Incidently the £3 or more to the dealer goes back to the early days of CDs when dealers took a bigger cut because of the need to hold stocks of slow moving high value items. Today (vinyl) LPs and singles no longer exist and CDs fly out of the door, so why do they still need to make so much profit? Given their huge buying power and slim margins, I still doubt the likes of Asda are selling them as loss leaders at £9.87 when the list price is 13-15 quid! Woody Hats off to Naxos then for retailing an incredibly wide range for just £4.95. Alan |
copy protected CDs
"Alan Murphy" wrote in message ... "Woody" wrote in message news:OErdc.13430$4N3.10592@newsfe1-win... "The Artist" wrote in message ... "Roy" emitted : Have I been incredibly devious here? I wasn't trying to defeat the copy protection, just watch it in action. My experience is that the copy protection doesn't work. All it achieves is making the CD unplayable on many (usually high end) CD players. However, if you rip the tracks ('cos the protection doen't work) and burn your own CD, that plays perfectly. Likewise. I have a couple of so-called protected discs that spit out glitches in my CD player, spoiling my enjoyment of the product. I backed them up in a few minutes and the backups play fine. This is wrong on so many levels! In what kind of paradoxical world does it make any sense to employ a copyright protection that necessitate the rightful owner to hack it? ****ing idiots.. My policy in software development is to use absolutely minimal protection. 60 seconds work to a cracker. The bottom line is if people intend to pay for something, they will.. -- S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t At the end of the day piracy would drop out of sight overnight if the greedy record companies marketed their products at a more acceptable price. It is widely known that on a full price CD the shop makes about £3, the artists gets about £1, and the disc costs about 98p to produce and bring to the shelf. Most of the rest of the cost is record company profit. Incidently the £3 or more to the dealer goes back to the early days of CDs when dealers took a bigger cut because of the need to hold stocks of slow moving high value items. Today (vinyl) LPs and singles no longer exist and CDs fly out of the door, so why do they still need to make so much profit? Given their huge buying power and slim margins, I still doubt the likes of Asda are selling them as loss leaders at £9.87 when the list price is 13-15 quid! Woody Hats off to Naxos then for retailing an incredibly wide range for just £4.95. Alan .....but even they used to be £3.99 or less! -- Woody |
copy protected CDs
"Andy Fish" wrote in message ... What would be really ironic would be if a copied version actually sounded better because the disk did not have these errors. I don't know if this is actually the case though Well I suppose they DO sound better, i.e they play whereas the originals don't. What galls me is that there is a de facto standard for CDs (the red book) which manufacturer's of players presumably adhere to and along come copy protected CDs which are not red book standard. Note that EMI etc. who use these copy protection techinques don't give any clue that the disc may not play on some "red book" players. They have however, been forced by Sony/Philips to remove the "compact disc digital audio" logo. So if that familiar logo is not there, think twice about buying it. Roy. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
copy protected CDs
"Alan Murphy" wrote in message ... "Woody" wrote in message Hats off to Naxos then for retailing an incredibly wide range for just £4.95. But why are they that expensive. Much cheaper in the US. |
copy protected CDs
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:05:16 +0000, Mike O'sullivan wrote:
"Alan Murphy" wrote in message ... "Woody" wrote in message Hats off to Naxos then for retailing an incredibly wide range for just £4.95. But why are they that expensive. Much cheaper in the US. Because the price charged has *nothing* to do with what it cost to produce. It is based on what is currently charged by others for a similar item in that geographic area. Don't believe tha BS about the market sizes etc. That doesn't come into it as CDs are so light that shipping costs are negligable when they are carried with other items. We are just ripped off on this side of the big pond... -- Cheers... Mick Gave up on viruses & trojans - moved to Linux... :-) Nascom & Gemini info at http://www.nascom.info |
copy protected CDs
"Form@C" wrote in message
.. . On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:05:16 +0000, Mike O'sullivan wrote: "Alan Murphy" wrote in message ... "Woody" wrote in message Hats off to Naxos then for retailing an incredibly wide range for just £4.95. But why are they that expensive. Much cheaper in the US. Because the price charged has *nothing* to do with what it cost to produce. It is based on what is currently charged by others for a similar item in that geographic area. Don't believe tha BS about the market sizes etc. That doesn't come into it as CDs are so light that shipping costs are negligable when they are carried with other items. We are just ripped off on this side of the big pond... -- Cheers... Mick If you believe that you will believe anything. Comparative pricing in the US and Europe is based on volume and sales velocity. Stuff flies off the shelves. I reckon pound for dollar is about right. Alan. PS. Talking about volume did you here about the Irishman who said. "I lose money on every sale but I make my profit on the volume". |
copy protected CDs
"Alan Murphy" wrote in message ... "Form@C" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:05:16 +0000, Mike O'sullivan wrote: "Alan Murphy" wrote in message ... "Woody" wrote in message Hats off to Naxos then for retailing an incredibly wide range for just £4.95. But why are they that expensive. Much cheaper in the US. Because the price charged has *nothing* to do with what it cost to produce. It is based on what is currently charged by others for a similar item in that geographic area. Don't believe tha BS about the market sizes etc. That doesn't come into it as CDs are so light that shipping costs are negligable when they are carried with other items. We are just ripped off on this side of the big pond... -- Cheers... Mick If you believe that you will believe anything. Comparative pricing in the US and Europe is based on volume and sales velocity. Stuff flies off the shelves. I reckon pound for dollar is about right. Alan. PS. Talking about volume did you here about the Irishman who said. "I lose money on every sale but I make my profit on the volume". and factor in VAT at 17.5% in the UK. regards malcolm |
copy protected CDs
"Whiteflyer" wrote in message ... I can confirm that is the case. Norah Jones Feels like Home will not play on a top of the range DVD player my cousin has, but after I did a straight copy using Nero 6 the copy disc plays fine. Remember on the back of all your vinyl albums from the 70's "Home Taping is Killing Music" Then CD copying Was Killing Music Now Downloading is Killing Music Crap music at high prices is killing music. I still doubt the likes of Asda are selling them as loss leaders at £9.87 when the list price is 13-15 quid! and even that is expense when you can buy the of the net at £8.99 or less from the likes of CD-WOW and Play247 and they will deliver it to your door. Your got to wonder the brains of the folk at the BPI when their way to stop piracy was to try and make CD-WOW put UP the price of a CD. Now that is plan stupid. also the population is aging in western sociaty, so less people to buy 'youth pop' music, the 14-24 YO group prob has the most disposible income for music. and PC games and similar are more attractive now than owning the latest albums. regards malcolm |
copy protected CDs
malcolm wrote:
"Whiteflyer" wrote in message ... I can confirm that is the case. Norah Jones Feels like Home will not play on a top of the range DVD player my cousin has, but after I did a straight copy using Nero 6 the copy disc plays fine. Remember on the back of all your vinyl albums from the 70's "Home Taping is Killing Music" Then CD copying Was Killing Music Now Downloading is Killing Music Crap music at high prices is killing music. I still doubt the likes of Asda are selling them as loss leaders at £9.87 when the list price is 13-15 quid! and even that is expense when you can buy the of the net at £8.99 or less from the likes of CD-WOW and Play247 and they will deliver it to your door. Your got to wonder the brains of the folk at the BPI when their way to stop piracy was to try and make CD-WOW put UP the price of a CD. Now that is plan stupid. also the population is aging in western sociaty, so less people to buy 'youth pop' music, I think the group nowadays with the most disposable income is the over 50s. Ian |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk