![]() |
Is this an audio group, a group for music lovers or an engineering group?
In article , Don Pearce
wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:14:07 +0100, Jim Lesurf wrote: Bear in mind that what I've written is very much a *simplified* version of what the physiologists now use as a model, but even so it has some surprising implications for audio/hifi... :-) Jim, I remember well a demo I heard many years ago. The sound was of a person reading words out slowly against a noise background. The background was sufficiently loud that it was impossible to work out the words. We listened several times, but still no intelligibility The proctor then told us what a couple of the words actually were. As if by magic, these words were suddenly clearly audible against the noise, whilst the rest remained inaudible. Not come across the above, but it sounds like a neat example of how humans can perform 'pattern recognition'. I'd presume this was occuring at a stage later than the cochlea, though. Somewhere in the brain activity. Afraid that I don't really know much about that beyond noting that humans seem to have some remarkable abilities in such things. I suppose that it is analogous in some ways to the visual test where a sheet of white paper with blobs on it can suddenly be 'recognised' as a dalmation dog against a background of leaves. This presumably only works if you are familiar with what a dog/dalmation looks like! :-) I don't suppose you know where a copy of this test may be found? It is really impressive. Afraid not. Even my own brain activity baffles me. :-) Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
Is this an audio group, a group for music lovers or an engineering group?
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:56:53 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote: In article , Don Pearce wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:14:07 +0100, Jim Lesurf wrote: Bear in mind that what I've written is very much a *simplified* version of what the physiologists now use as a model, but even so it has some surprising implications for audio/hifi... :-) Jim, I remember well a demo I heard many years ago. The sound was of a person reading words out slowly against a noise background. The background was sufficiently loud that it was impossible to work out the words. We listened several times, but still no intelligibility The proctor then told us what a couple of the words actually were. As if by magic, these words were suddenly clearly audible against the noise, whilst the rest remained inaudible. Not come across the above, but it sounds like a neat example of how humans can perform 'pattern recognition'. I'd presume this was occuring at a stage later than the cochlea, though. Somewhere in the brain activity. Afraid that I don't really know much about that beyond noting that humans seem to have some remarkable abilities in such things. I suppose that it is analogous in some ways to the visual test where a sheet of white paper with blobs on it can suddenly be 'recognised' as a dalmation dog against a background of leaves. This presumably only works if you are familiar with what a dog/dalmation looks like! :-) I don't suppose you know where a copy of this test may be found? It is really impressive. Afraid not. Even my own brain activity baffles me. :-) Slainte, Jim I think there is an analogy to telecoms - namely CDMA. What you receive is noise, unless you know what the spreading code is. Then you can perform what looks rather like magic on the signal to noise ratio. Nonsense, of course, since what actually happens is that the information hasn't been transmitted - it is already present at both ends of the link. Impressive though, until you suss what is going on. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
Is this an audio group, a group for music lovers or an engineering group?
Arny Krueger wrote:
More than a microphone, the ear embodies a pretty interesting spectrum analyzer as well. ....and if you take enough drugs you get to see the graphical display that goes with the analyser :-)) -- The presence of this sig indicates that I'm under the influence of excess alcohol. Until I'm sober enough to remember to switch this sig file off, please treat the above as merely drunken ranting and treat it with the contempt it probably deserves. I apologise in advance for any offence caused :-) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk