![]() |
Choosing a second-hand amp for my near field monitors
Hi folks, I'm doing some milti-track recording at home, andI need to obtain an amplifier to power a pair of near field monitors (possibly Tannoy Reveals) which I'll be using for mix-downs. I'm on a tight budget at present, so I'm looking at second-hand hi-fi amps. A local junk shop usually has a selection of them. I gather the amp needs to be flat-response i.e., uncoloured, accurate and clear. Can anyone give me any tips on selecting one? I'm not a hi-fi buff, despite my recording pursuits. Many thanks for any suggestions, Alan W |
Choosing a second-hand amp for my near field monitors
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 23:14:17 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article , AlanW1, UK wrote: I'm doing some milti-track recording at home, andI need to obtain an amplifier to power a pair of near field monitors (possibly Tannoy Reveals) which I'll be using for mix-downs. I'm on a tight budget at present, so I'm looking at second-hand hi-fi amps. A local junk shop usually has a selection of them. I gather the amp needs to be flat-response i.e., uncoloured, accurate and clear. Can anyone give me any tips on selecting one? I'm not a hi-fi buff, despite my recording pursuits. NAD 3020i? Plenty around, and pretty reliable as well as sounding good. I've had one in use about 10 hours a day for many years and it's great. Wouldn't expect one to cost much - 30 quid or so? Dave, Thanks for the tip. What about those tuner/amps? Are they generally suitable (provided they have auxiliary inputs and enough wattage)? And how about older (70's) transistor amps - which tend to be cheaper? Thanks again, Alan W |
Choosing a second-hand amp for my near field monitors
In article ,
AlanW1, UK wrote: I'm doing some milti-track recording at home, andI need to obtain an amplifier to power a pair of near field monitors (possibly Tannoy Reveals) which I'll be using for mix-downs. I'm on a tight budget at present, so I'm looking at second-hand hi-fi amps. A local junk shop usually has a selection of them. I gather the amp needs to be flat-response i.e., uncoloured, accurate and clear. Can anyone give me any tips on selecting one? I'm not a hi-fi buff, despite my recording pursuits. NAD 3020i? Plenty around, and pretty reliable as well as sounding good. I've had one in use about 10 hours a day for many years and it's great. Wouldn't expect one to cost much - 30 quid or so? -- *Who are these kids and why are they calling me Mom? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Choosing a second-hand amp for my near field monitors
In article , AlanW1, UK
wrote: Dave, Thanks for the tip. What about those tuner/amps? Are they generally suitable (provided they have auxiliary inputs and enough wattage)? And how about older (70's) transistor amps - which tend to be cheaper? It's quite possible that an older amplifier would be fine. However the problem is that this becomes a matter of how well that particular unit has been treated, and if any components have deteriorated significantly. Hence the state of the individual unit probably matters. Since I have an interest in 'Armstrong' equipment I can risk saying that some of the old '600' range amps and tuner amps still can work very nicely for general use. (One advantage being that the signal switching uses simple electronic diode gates soinput switch deterioration is less likely to be a problem than with some other designs.) However you might find one unit that worked like new, and another that was a mess after 30-odd years of misuse. FWIW I'm listening to an Armstrong 626 at the moment. BBC Radio 3 Jazz into a pair of LS3/5A's. Sound quite good to me. But the 626 in question has been carefully looked after. Also, the above might well not suit your use if you need steady high power levels. So I'm only really quoting it as an example which I happen to know. Also, some of the 1970s/80s Pioneer and similar high power amps were much better than people perhaps now recall or admit. But again, once you're talking 10+ years old your best bet is to try the individual unit as otherwise you are taking a chance. Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
Choosing a second-hand amp for my near field monitors
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 17:20:39 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote: Also, some of the 1970s/80s Pioneer and similar high power amps were much better than people perhaps now recall or admit. But again, once you're talking 10+ years old your best bet is to try the individual unit as otherwise you are taking a chance. Jim, That's very helpful; thanks. I'll take your advice on that. It's goot to know that the tuner amps are a viable option too. Alan W |
Choosing a second-hand amp for my near field monitors
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk