
October 20th 04, 06:19 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
In article ,
Wally wrote:
Don't think you'd find any problems sourcing NE5534AN - Maplin stock
them.
I haven't looked for them yet - found a Phillips data sheet that said hey
were discontinued, so assumed they might be hard to find.
Could be that refers to an 'N' suffix.
--
*Growing old is inevitable, growing up is optional *
Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
|

October 20th 04, 10:27 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
Wally wrote:
As some of you may be aware, I have an on-going speaker rebuild fantasy
bubbling away in the background. The plan is to bi-amp, and part of this
involves a second line output on the pre-amp, to send a signal to the bass
amp. The bass/midrange driver will have no high-pass components in the
crossover - I intend to let the bass roll off naturally, and try to match
the low-pass filter feeding the subs to this roll-off. I'm edging towards
trying to make a prototype filter and would welcome comments...
The pre-amp is a Cambridge A75. The chips it uses are NE5534N op-amps,
evidently low-noise and suitable for high quality audio. My intention was to
use the same chips for my active filter / output stage, on the assumption
that the pre-amp's PSU will be delivering the right voltage(s). However, it
looks like these chips are no longer made - what would be a suitable
alternative?
I know next to nothing about solid state electronics, but my efforts so far
would suggest that I want to use an integrator and a phase inverter. The
integrator provides the actual filtering effect (I think), but is 180
degrees out at the crossover, decreasing to 90 degrees lower down. It would
seem to be a good thing to try and get the subs to be in phase at the point
where they cross over the natural roll-off of the bass/mid drivers/cabs. So,
I reckon the active filter and a phase inverter will do the trick - that
should give me zero degrees shift at crossover, and 90 degrees lag somewhere
low down. (I'm considering a crossover point at something around 60-80Hz.)
Does this sound like it should work?
No.
As you know nothing about electronics you should start with this:
http://www.bmm-electronics.com/Product.asp?Product_ID=7
You really are better off with steep high and low pass filters.
trying to match the hf response of a sub to the lf response of a
mid-range box is difficult, and putting a lot of power through the
mid-range below its resonant frequency is asking for trouble.
--
Eiron.
|

October 20th 04, 10:34 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
Eiron wrote:
You really are better off with steep high and low pass filters.
trying to match the hf response of a sub to the lf response of a
mid-range box is difficult, and putting a lot of power through the
mid-range below its resonant frequency is asking for trouble.
The 'midrange' is a KEF B110, which I believe has a sufficiently low
resonant frequency to serve as a bass driver as well.
--
Wally
www.artbywally.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk
|

October 20th 04, 10:46 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:13:32 +0100, "Wally"
wrote:
hi.
have a look at this http://www.linkwitzlab.com/
theres lots of info here
regards
bob
|

October 20th 04, 11:03 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
Wally wrote:
Eiron wrote:
You really are better off with steep high and low pass filters.
Trying to match the hf response of a sub to the lf response of a
mid-range box is difficult, and putting a lot of power through the
mid-range below its resonant frequency is asking for trouble.
The 'midrange' is a KEF B110, which I believe has a sufficiently low
resonant frequency to serve as a bass driver as well.
I'm listening to one at the moment.
I like them but Stuart P thinks that the sound from a Bextrene cone
collapses at low levels.
Here are some specs for a typical box using the B110:
http://www.mhennessy.f9.co.uk/rogers/ls35a_page4.jpg
If you use an open baffle or reflex box then the cone will flap about
dangerously at moderate power levels (without a high-pass filter)
You should be OK with a closed box and up to a 100w amp
but I would still recommend a 2-way 4th-order Linkwitz-Riley crossover
at 100hz or higher.
--
Eiron.
|

October 20th 04, 11:36 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
In article ,
Wally wrote:
Don't think you'd find any problems sourcing NE5534AN - Maplin stock
them.
I haven't looked for them yet - found a Phillips data sheet that said hey
were discontinued, so assumed they might be hard to find.
Could be that refers to an 'N' suffix.
Somewhat strangely it seems that Philips *have* discontinued it !
http://www.semiconductors.philips.co...E5534_A_2.html
See note and link towards the bottom of the page.
TI and JRC still make them I'm sure - and the 5532 as well.
Graham
|

October 21st 04, 06:14 AM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:39:33 +0100, Ian Bell
wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote:
Wally wrote:
As some of you may be aware, I have an on-going speaker rebuild fantasy
bubbling away in the background. The plan is to bi-amp, and part of this
involves a second line output on the pre-amp, to send a signal to the
bass amp. The bass/midrange driver will have no high-pass components in
the crossover - I intend to let the bass roll off naturally, and try to
match the low-pass filter feeding the subs to this roll-off. I'm edging
towards trying to make a prototype filter and would welcome comments...
The pre-amp is a Cambridge A75. The chips it uses are NE5534N op-amps,
evidently low-noise and suitable for high quality audio. My intention was
to use the same chips for my active filter / output stage, on the
assumption that the pre-amp's PSU will be delivering the right
voltage(s). However, it looks like these chips are no longer made - what
would be a suitable alternative?
5534s are most certainly still made. What made you think they aren't ?
Available from many places. Best audio op amp ever made IMHO. Try Maplins
for starters.
If it's good enough for Meridian output stages, then it's good enough
for me! :-)
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
|

October 21st 04, 06:33 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
Low-pass filter thoughts
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
If it's good enough for Meridian output stages, then it's good enough
for me! :-)
They're in the 203? That means that my audio signal goes through nothing but
5534s before hitting the valves (which are soaked in swamp water to give 'em
soul...).
--
Wally
www.artbywally.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|