On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:



And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.

You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.
And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much
less measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick
two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that
asking "to much" ???

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the
patronizing idiot krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink
noise and an oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a
standart CD player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the
process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some
steem to ridicule such folk.

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)

There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger? In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean) preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)


There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger?

Like I said I haven't read any of the *articles* that you might have
posted on RAO up to now.

But went through some 10-15 of your articles just now, and found you to
be vain, smug, patronizing, argumentative, and mostly demogogic. your
vain, patronizing attitude and the way you throw fished-from-a-thesaurus
words around indicate that you are after some sort of a compensation for
your "exceptional mediocrity" (oxymoron? No, not inyour case.) ...

All this makes you a bit of a bore, a some sort of a bore, that is, you
*are* boring, yes, no doubt about that, but you make it hard for
sensible people to pin you down. But yes, you *can* be "lumped" with the
ferstler, krooger, etc, bunch, since you are, in the end, a bore, read:
boooooooriiing..

You don't have wood for ears though.

In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean)

Read above. And dully snap back with some snappy question for an answer,
thank you.


preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

An article is what one posts on a newsgroup in the usenet. Now, if you
would like more clarification and definitions as to what might be a
"newsgroup", a "post", or the "usenet" etc, then I suggest you dully
snap back with a smug little question, clipping all else essential and
quoting some minor detail, as in: "usenet, do enlighten us fella, what
might be this usenet?"

"Fella" wrote in message
.. .
Michael McKelvy wrote:




First lets deal with falsehood of anybody saying all CD players and amps
sound the same. It is that all CD players working the way tehy are
supposed to sound the same.



This is just hilarious. He says that it is a falsehood that anynody
says a given, then RIGHT AFTERWARDS he says it himself..!


If you have 2 CD players and one sounds different, one is either
malfunctioning or designed to sound someway other than flat.


Well I sure wouldn't want my CD player to sound flat! I guess I'll go
with the "malfunctioning" ones!


Then you don't understand the term flat as intended here.

Same for amps.


Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..
Resistance is futile!


Rsistance to truth is, yep.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Fella said:

Thus spake ze god of audio-physics, ze force of knowing it all..

Real gods don't need to have the spittle wiped off their chins.



A case of Kleenex is on it's way to you.

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:


And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.

I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.
Touché.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .

Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

.. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.

How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?

And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick

It's not God like abilities, it's science.

two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ???

Way too much.

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the

Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?

process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.


It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk.

If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.

****, this thread has drifted.

The first speakers I "fell in love with" were Spendor SP2s.

I ended up getting SP1s though. This was 88/89. Kept the SP1s
until '97, when some scally burglar burgled them.

Those Spendor bass units sure had some excursion!

The sticky gloopy stuff painted on them was a bit weird though. What was
all that about? ISTR I used to know, or had at least read something, but
I've forgotten now.



Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:28:20 +0100, "Mike Gilmour"
wrote:


"Fleetie" wrote in message
...
"MINe 109" wrote
(Still remember listening at nearly top volume to Metallica "One" on
NS-1000Ms with a Quad 606 in the late 80s in the dem room at Chatham
Sevenoaks Hi-Fi, where I had a part-time job back then, after we'd
shut the shop. Our ears nearly bled!)

I've seen them, but have never heard them.

They (NS-1000M) were noted for being efficient *and* being able to take
high power.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967
110890
Manchester, U.K.
http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk


Yes but in pro situations they blew tweeters like no tomorrow, I was told
that on average 6 tweeters were subsequently provided to pro-owners for a
pair within the ownership period. The trick to calm the ear bleeding
treble was a sheet of soft toilet paper over the tweeters. True engineering

Actually, the trick in both cases was to turn the amp up to 9 rather
than to 11.........

It was indeed true engineering, and the tweeter 'problem' explains why
almost all 'sound engineers' are prematurely deaf! As can be heard on
most modern pop records................ :-(
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering