![]() |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
I'm about to embark on a speaker build, and I thought I'd check in to see what
useful things other speaker builders on this ng have found out. I've built several before, but I thought to do something a little different. Design will be a 2-way (or MTM) box. The first decision I've made is to use thick alu U shape extrusions front and back. The sides will be bolted to the extrusion, and the top + bottom screwed down, so the whole thing can be taken apart quite easily. I could use drive units front and back and join them with a metal pipe to stop resonances. I could fit a bottom with a tuned pipe to increase the bass. As for materials for the sides and top, I could go with twin walls and sand in between. I could get some of that interesting wood laminate I saw at the HiFi show - very thick, from alternate layers of thin ply, and adhesive in a kind of thin plastic tile with labyrinthine folds. The alu U section I have is 6" wide and very chunky. Units would therefore be restricted in size - I have some B110s to use, may also look at Morel 142. Size would be 15" high, not decided on depth. Width would be the 6" plate plus the thickness of the walls, which I'd expect to be not less than 2" each side. Comments? Andy === Andy Evans === Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com Audio, music and health pages and interesting links. |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
Andy Evans wrote:
I'm about to embark on a speaker build, and I thought I'd check in to see what useful things other speaker builders on this ng have found out. I've built several before, but I thought to do something a little different. Design will be a 2-way (or MTM) box. The first decision I've made is to use thick alu U shape extrusions front and back. Do you mean a 'rectangular' U-shape, like box section with one face removed? How wide are the faces that come back, and how thick is the extrusion? The sides will be bolted to the extrusion, and the top + bottom screwed down, so the whole thing can be taken apart quite easily. How would you seal the joins? ... I could use drive units front and back and join them with a metal pipe to stop resonances. ... Do you mean like a compression post between the front and back panels? Would a solid bar be better than a pipe? As for materials for the sides and top, I could go with twin walls and sand in between. How about moulded panels, using some sort of resin with sand (or other filler/mass) mixed through to make a paste? I could get some of that interesting wood laminate I saw at the HiFi show - very thick, from alternate layers of thin ply, and adhesive in a kind of thin plastic tile with labyrinthine folds. Can't visualise where the folds come into it. The alu U section I have is 6" wide and very chunky. Units would therefore be restricted in size - I have some B110s to use, may also look at Morel 142. Size would be 15" high, not decided on depth. Width would be the 6" plate plus the thickness of the walls, which I'd expect to be not less than 2" each side. Comments? Andy You could go for golden ratio sizes (internally): 6" wide, 10" deep, 16" high. Supposed to give a good spread of distances between panels, such that standing waves are spread out (ie, better than a cube). That would give a volume of 15 litres, less cone, magnet and internal bracing. -- Wally www.artbywally.com www.wally.myby.co.uk |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
U section is also called 'channel' You can see some profiles at :
http://catalogues.kellysearch.com/ca...5526&pg=9&pn=& type=2&q=7&cn=1 Mine is 6" wide. It's in the car, so can't give you the other measurements, but I think it's 3" deep. === Andy Evans === Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com Audio, music and health pages and interesting links. |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
Andy Evans wrote:
I'm about to embark on a speaker build, I have some B110s to use, may also look at Morel 142. Size would be 15" high, not decided on depth. Width would be the 6" plate plus the thickness of the walls, which I'd expect to be not less than 2" each side. Alloy plus 2" of MDF seems a little excessive for a B110, especially as there is no point in an enclosure any bigger than 10l. I used 18mm. MDF with veneer on the outside and bitumen on the inside. A pair of B110s went on ebay for £112 this afternoon (5727464855). Why not sell yours to an enthusiast and use something more modern, better and cheaper? -- Eiron. |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
Alloy plus 2" of MDF seems a little excessive for a B110, especially as
there is no point in an enclosure any bigger than 10l. I used 18mm. MDF with veneer on the outside and bitumen on the inside. That's pretty much what I have right now. A pair of B110s went on ebay for £112 this afternoon (5727464855). Why not sell yours to an enthusiast and use something more modern, better and cheaper? Eiron - that's a great idea. Thanks for telling me - I had no idea. But what instead? === Andy Evans === Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com Audio, music and health pages and interesting links. |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
Andy Evans wrote:
Alloy plus 2" of MDF seems a little excessive for a B110, especially as there is no point in an enclosure any bigger than 10l. I used 18mm. MDF with veneer on the outside and bitumen on the inside. That's pretty much what I have right now. A pair of B110s went on ebay for £112 this afternoon (5727464855). Why not sell yours to an enthusiast and use something more modern, better and cheaper? Eiron - that's a great idea. Thanks for telling me - I had no idea. But what instead? Wilmslow Audio, http://www.wilmslow-audio.co.uk recommends the Monacor SPH-135/AD as a direct replacement for the B110 at £35. However, the SPH-135C with a carbon fibre cone, looks much sexier. http://www.monacor.com has all the details. Perhaps I should sell my KEF drivers. Unfortunately I have a sentimental attachment to them.... -- Eiron. |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
Eiron wrote in
: .. : A pair of B110s went on ebay for £112 this afternoon (5727464855). Why not : : sell yours to an enthusiast and use something more modern, better and cheaper? : : Eiron - that's a great idea. Thanks for telling me - I had no idea. But what : instead? : : : Wilmslow Audio, http://www.wilmslow-audio.co.uk recommends : the Monacor SPH-135/AD as a direct replacement for the B110 at £35. : : However, the SPH-135C with a carbon fibre cone, looks much sexier. If that's what you want ... but the 135 is WA's only "B110 replacement". They do have different characteristics, as can be seen from the details. : http://www.monacor.com has all the details. Compare especially the middle and bottom of each page. http://www.monacor.com/int/en/produktseite_gesamtprogramm.php?artid=2098&spr=EN& typ=u http://www.monacor.com/int/en/produktseite_gesamtprogramm.php?artid=2081&spr=EN& typ=u : Perhaps I should sell my KEF drivers. Unfortunately I have a : sentimental attachment to them.... Me too ... I was lucky to get a new pair as a service kit a few years ago. RdM |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
Before doing anything I would go here; http://www.diyaudio.com/ and go to
the loudspeaker section and ask a few questions about cabinets, ask for some software to design your boxes and then discuss what you want to do, you will probable find someone whose already done it. It's a very good forum. Jem |
DIY Speaker cabinet construction
Before doing anything I would go here; http://www.diyaudio.com/ and go to
the loudspeaker section and ask a few questions about cabinets Good idea - I usually only look at the tubes page. === Andy Evans === Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com Audio, music and health pages and interesting links. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk