Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Quad's dynamic speakers (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/2466-quads-dynamic-speakers.html)

AKT November 10th 04 10:14 PM

Quad's dynamic speakers
 
To avoid any misunderstanding, this post is not about ESL's but Quad's
dynamic speakers (21/22L?). A claim was made in another post that these
are "much better" than Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio. I was wondering if
people strongly agree or disagree with that.

I happen to own Spendor BC-1's and occasionally toy with the idea of
either a current Spendor or a Proac/Dynaudio model as possible upgrade.
However, if 21/22L's are better that will surely simplify my fantasy
life. :) All in all, are the Quads an improvement on BC-1's or more of
a horizontal move?

Thanks and I do know I have to make any purchase decisions myself. I am
merely curious about the opinion of those who happen to know these
speakers.

MiNe 109 November 10th 04 11:16 PM

Quad's dynamic speakers
 
In article , AKT
wrote:

To avoid any misunderstanding, this post is not about ESL's but Quad's
dynamic speakers (21/22L?). A claim was made in another post that these
are "much better" than Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio. I was wondering if
people strongly agree or disagree with that.

I happen to own Spendor BC-1's and occasionally toy with the idea of
either a current Spendor or a Proac/Dynaudio model as possible upgrade.
However, if 21/22L's are better that will surely simplify my fantasy
life. :) All in all, are the Quads an improvement on BC-1's or more of
a horizontal move?

Thanks and I do know I have to make any purchase decisions myself. I am
merely curious about the opinion of those who happen to know these
speakers.


I believe the claim was that ESLs are much better. However, I'm also
curious about these speakers.

Stephen

Stewart Pinkerton November 11th 04 06:24 AM

Quad's dynamic speakers
 
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:14:06 GMT, AKT wrote:

To avoid any misunderstanding, this post is not about ESL's but Quad's
dynamic speakers (21/22L?). A claim was made in another post that these
are "much better" than Spendor, Proac, Dynaudio. I was wondering if
people strongly agree or disagree with that.


Disagree, but there's no need for strength! :-)

I happen to own Spendor BC-1's and occasionally toy with the idea of
either a current Spendor or a Proac/Dynaudio model as possible upgrade.
However, if 21/22L's are better that will surely simplify my fantasy
life. :) All in all, are the Quads an improvement on BC-1's or more of
a horizontal move?


They are an improvement, but only because they're thirty years newer!
Try new Spendors, or particularly the Dynaudio Audience 52SE.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Fleetie November 13th 04 06:40 AM

Quad's dynamic speakers
 
Quad Dynamic Speakers: A sign of being tied to the Yankee dollar.

No, I've never heard them,but in my extremely arrogant opinion,
I reckon the rather low-priced Quad dynamic (moving coil) speakers
are unlikely to be anywhere near the best examples of the art.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk



AKT November 13th 04 10:52 PM

"Wharfedale Quad"?
 
At times I have come across the phrase "Wharfdale Quad" seemingly
implying as if the two companies had merged. Is that the case? Or are
Quad producs still eparate?


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk