Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Pinko Presumptuous: yours, gentlemen of UKRA? (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/2922-pinko-presumptuous-yours-gentlemen-ukra.html)

[email protected] March 25th 05 05:36 AM

Pinko Presumptuous: yours, gentlemen of UKRA?
 
Gentlemen and others on UKRA:

Poor Pinko Presumptuous is being crucified on RAT. You UKRA jokers who
sent the pitiful little man to RAT to "take the fight to the enemy" (1)
had better come fetch what's left of your gladiatorial envoy before
there is nothing left except a whimpering wet spot.

Pinkerton is a posturing poodlefaker who knows nothing about
electronics we don't already know and less about polemics. Below is a
dire example of Pinko running kamikazi-fashion to commit suicide.

Next time you desk soldiers of UKRA want to declare war on RAT, send
someone who at least has the wit to be entertaining while he flames us.
Since you clearly have no one with the faintest glimmer, perhaps you
should borrow Lord Valve from alt.guitar.amps or go get Arnie from
wherever. RAT is a first class newsgroup; we deserve to be flamed by a
first class flame merchant, not some faintwitted tenth carbon copy.
Pinkerton isn't just turning himself into a laughingstock, he's turning
UKRA, his boorish sponsor (2), into a laughingstock. He's giving
engineers everywhere a bad name by his eagerness to fall over his own
feet.

Sheesh! A little flame war isn't rocket science -- and you send us this
congenital eejit! How can you expect anyone to treat you with respect
if Pinkerton is the best you can manage?

Andre Jute

(1) uk.rec.audio in the thread "A little birdie tells me.... " on and
around 8 December 2004: "kudos for 'taking the fight to the
enemy'...!!!"
(2) How can it not be boorish for you to send a piece of transistor
slime to assault a tube newsgroup without any provocation? It is doubly
boorish to send such an unsubtle and unsophisticated incompetent as
Pinkerton.

****
Here's just one sample of the Pinko's stumblebum stupidities on RAT:

John Byrns wrote, quoting Andre Jute:
(1) One can easily spot the most useless engineers. Twenty and

thirty
years after they left college they insist on telling everyone

that they
have a diploma and that after years of switching on the lights

over the
boards of more creative men they rose all the way to "senior
designer". Typically they have been pushed out of jobs as

analog or
digital hardware engineers and now do "software engineering"

which
is most often a euphemism for plugging together the computers

of more
productive workers, or they have other jobs altogether and

resent their
fall enough not to care that they expose their bitterness in

public.

Stewart Pinkerton whined:
On a completely seperate note, I am disappointed that you would
egregiously include the bitter ravings of Jute in your post. I

thought
better of you. Jute's post tells much more of him than of me, and

I
had presumed more of you than to be a mirror of his despair.


John Byrns replied:
What you call the "bitter ravings of Jute" is the only plausible
explanation I have yet seen for your activities in this group. Your

whole
purpose for posting in this group appears to be to make as many

negative
comments about tube amplifiers as possible [snip]. Can you give a

better
reason than Andre's to explain your apparent need to make constant
negative comments about tubes, in a group of tube lovers?


Stewart Pinkerton whined ever more defensively:
If you took the trouble to actually read what I wrote, you'd see that
I have no problem with those who design with tubes for hobby reasons.
I do however have a problem with those who claim that tubes have any
kind of genuine superiority in terms of high fidelity to the source.
This simply is *not* the case, and I'm happy to explain exactly why
this is so.
Regrettably, some tubeophiles get upset when their pet theories are
debunked, and feel a desperate need to shoot the messenger. I've

never
yet seen a *logical* rebuttal to my arguments.


To which the answer, from those few who can still be bothered with
Pinkerton, will probably be, Who cares **** what your "problems" are.
But there's no need to go there. Come fetch the damp little squirt
home, will you. This is getting embarrassing.


[email protected] March 25th 05 06:20 AM

Why he is Pinko Presumptuous
 
Pinko for Pinkerton's entryism, a process devised by Lenin for taking
over "enemies" from within. Also for the pink social climber's coat he
wears while watching small animals torn apart hy hounds.

Presumptuous for his method of taking a single fact out of context,
building a fantastical set of connections on it, then posturing as an
expert, then on his erroneous single "fact" fantastically abusing
people who actually know what they're talking about, then, without
apology, excusing himself for "presuming" facts where there are none.
On this basis this immoral slimeball called me a mass murderer!

Pinko Presumptuous! Of course he is. It is impossible to defend such
unprincipled trash. Pinkerton imparts a stink to the good name of the
vast majority of decent engineers.

Andre Jute


Stewart Pinkerton March 25th 05 07:02 AM

The continuing mental decline of Andre Jute
 
On 24 Mar 2005 22:36:54 -0800, wrote:

Gentlemen and others on UKRA:

Poor Pinko Presumptuous is being crucified on RAT.


Only in your vivid but deranged imagination, Jute.

You UKRA jokers who
sent the pitiful little man to RAT to "take the fight to the enemy" (1)
had better come fetch what's left of your gladiatorial envoy before
there is nothing left except a whimpering wet spot.


No one sent me anywhere, and the only whimpering wet spot around here
is the poor deranged stalker who is creating all these ad hominem
attack threads. Get professional help, NOW!

Pinkerton is a posturing poodlefaker


?

who knows nothing about
electronics we don't already know and less about polemics.


Seems to be working pretty well with you and your mythical pile of
single-ended junk called KISS, doesn't it?

Just take your meds and go see the shrink voluntarily this time,
before they secion you again.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton March 25th 05 07:02 AM

More sad paranoia from Andre Jute
 
On 24 Mar 2005 23:20:02 -0800, "
wrote:

Presumptuous for his method of taking a single fact out of context,
building a fantastical set of connections on it, then posturing as an
expert, then on his erroneous single "fact" fantastically abusing
people who actually know what they're talking about, then, without
apology, excusing himself for "presuming" facts where there are none.
On this basis this immoral slimeball called me a mass murderer!


Still wriggling on the hook, eh?

Pinko Presumptuous! Of course he is. It is impossible to defend such
unprincipled trash. Pinkerton imparts a stink to the good name of the
vast majority of decent engineers.


How would you know, with your nose buried so deep in your own
excrement that you have to create a fawning band of sycophantic
sockpuppets to satisfy your desperate need for admiration? You are a
laughing stock, a bitter old man crying into his Guinness about the
good old days of putting 'fellows' up in front of firing squads.

Get professional help, NOW!
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Keith G March 25th 05 12:30 PM

Pinko Presumptuous: yours, gentlemen of UKRA?
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
Gentlemen and others on UKRA:



crap snipped


Give it a rest now - you're just making yourself look silly....





mick March 25th 05 02:38 PM

Pinko Presumptuous: yours, gentlemen of UKRA?
 
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:36:54 -0800, fiultra wrote:

Gentlemen and others on UKRA:

Poor Pinko Presumptuous is being crucified on RAT. You UKRA jokers who
sent the pitiful little man to RAT to "take the fight to the enemy" (1)
had better come fetch what's left of your gladiatorial envoy before
there is nothing left except a whimpering wet spot.

snip

Hi Andre, welcome to sanity...

Do you really think anyone here really *cares* about the feuds on RAT?
That lot don't even use the right name for Valves!

Please - don't drag this out across more than one newsgroup. It is a waste
of effort on your part (even if it is fun!) and can only make you look
foolish eventually. It isn't worth it.

The same goes to you too, SP - lets please keep *one* area of sanity. The
other side of the pond is obviously not the place!

--
Mick
(no M$ software on here... :-) )
Web: http://www.nascom.info
Web: http://projectedsound.tk



mick March 25th 05 02:42 PM

Pinko Presumptuous: yours, gentlemen of UKRA?
 
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:36:54 -0800, fiultra wrote:

Gentlemen and others on UKRA:

Poor Pinko Presumptuous is being crucified on RAT. You UKRA jokers who
sent the pitiful little man to RAT to "take the fight to the enemy" (1)
had better come fetch what's left of your gladiatorial envoy before
there is nothing left except a whimpering wet spot.

snip


Andre has cross-posted this to RAT.
If anyone would like to keep comments local, I have set follow-ups to this
post to uk.rec.audio only.


--
Mick
(no M$ software on here... :-) )
Web: http://www.nascom.info
Web: http://projectedsound.tk



[email protected] March 25th 05 07:55 PM

On the guilt of UKRA in PInkerton's failed crusade Pinko Presumptuous: yours, gentlemen of UKRA?
 

Keith G wrote:
Andre Jute wrote:
Gentlemen and others on UKRA:

crap snipped
Give it a rest now - you're just making yourself look silly....


Below is the evidence that you silly jerks on UKRA sent the eejit
Pinkerton on a crusade to "exterminate" RAT. It puts the egg on your
faces, not mine. You can't sneer the facts of your complicity in this
boorishness out of existence.

Here, with compliments from those you called "scrotum-rubbers" is your
standard-bearer back, in tatters.

I suggest you shut the **** up lest I decide to do to UKRA what you
sent Pinkerton to do to RAT, but to do it competently.

Andre Jute

UKRA's GUILT, FROM ITS OWN MOUTH AT:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/... 8d762a34479b

*******
A little birdie tells me....

Keith G
Dec 7 2004, 3:31 pm

.....that Pinky has legged it over to RAT and is waving Sand Amps in
their
faces!!

I suppose you've got to give the **** kudos for 'taking the fight to
the
enemy'...!!!

(I bet that's got all the scrotum-rubbers in a tiz!! :-)
**********

AND, FOR THE RECORD, HERE IS THE OUTCOME OF PINKERTON'S CRUSADE TO
"EXTERMINATE" RAT:

Gentlemen and others on UKRA:

Poor Pinko Presumptuous is being crucified on RAT. You UKRA jokers who
sent the pitiful little man to RAT to "take the fight to the enemy" (1)
had better come fetch what's left of your gladiatorial envoy before
there is nothing left except a whimpering wet spot.

Pinkerton is a posturing poodlefaker who knows nothing about
electronics we don't already know and less about polemics. Below is a
dire example of Pinko running kamikazi-fashion to commit suicide.

Next time you desk soldiers of UKRA want to declare war on RAT, send
someone who at least has the wit to be entertaining while he flames us.
Since you clearly have no one with the faintest glimmer, perhaps you
should borrow Lord Valve from alt.guitar.amps or go get Arnie from
wherever. RAT is a first class newsgroup; we deserve to be flamed by a
first class flame merchant, not some faintwitted tenth carbon copy.
Pinkerton isn't just turning himself into a laughingstock, he's turning
UKRA, his boorish sponsor (2), into a laughingstock. He's giving
engineers everywhere a bad name by his eagerness to fall over his own
feet.

Sheesh! A little flame war isn't rocket science -- and you send us this
congenital eejit! How can you expect anyone to treat you with respect
if Pinkerton is the best you can manage?

Andre Jute

(1) uk.rec.audio in the thread "A little birdie tells me.... " on and
around 8 December 2004: "kudos for 'taking the fight to the
enemy'...!!!"
(2) How can it not be boorish for you to send a piece of transistor
slime to assault a tube newsgroup without any provocation? It is doubly
boorish to send such an unsubtle and unsophisticated incompetent as
Pinkerton.

****
Here's just one sample of the Pinko's stumblebum stupidities on RAT:

John Byrns wrote, quoting Andre Jute:
(1) One can easily spot the most useless engineers. Twenty and

thirty
years after they left college they insist on telling everyone

that they
have a diploma and that after years of switching on the lights

over the
boards of more creative men they rose all the way to "senior
designer". Typically they have been pushed out of jobs as

analog or
digital hardware engineers and now do "software engineering"

which
is most often a euphemism for plugging together the computers

of more
productive workers, or they have other jobs altogether and

resent their
fall enough not to care that they expose their bitterness in

public.

Stewart Pinkerton whined:
On a completely seperate note, I am disappointed that you would
egregiously include the bitter ravings of Jute in your post. I

thought
better of you. Jute's post tells much more of him than of me, and

I
had presumed more of you than to be a mirror of his despair.


John Byrns replied:
What you call the "bitter ravings of Jute" is the only plausible
explanation I have yet seen for your activities in this group. Your

whole
purpose for posting in this group appears to be to make as many

negative
comments about tube amplifiers as possible [snip]. Can you give a

better
reason than Andre's to explain your apparent need to make constant
negative comments about tubes, in a group of tube lovers?


Stewart Pinkerton whined ever more defensively:
If you took the trouble to actually read what I wrote, you'd see that
I have no problem with those who design with tubes for hobby reasons.
I do however have a problem with those who claim that tubes have any
kind of genuine superiority in terms of high fidelity to the source.
This simply is *not* the case, and I'm happy to explain exactly why
this is so.
Regrettably, some tubeophiles get upset when their pet theories are
debunked, and feel a desperate need to shoot the messenger. I've

never
yet seen a *logical* rebuttal to my arguments.


To which the answer, from those few who can still be bothered with
Pinkerton, will probably be, Who cares **** what your "problems" are.
But there's no need to go there. Come fetch the damp little squirt
home, will you. This is getting embarrassing.


[email protected] March 25th 05 07:59 PM

The commie methods of Pinko Presumptuous
 
Yo, scumball, you haven't answered this point:

Pinko for Pinkerton's entryism, a process devised by Lenin for taking
over "enemies" from within. Also for the pink social climber's coat he
wears while watching small animals torn apart hy hounds.

Andre Jute

The character assassin Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 24 Mar 2005 23:20:02 -0800, "


wrote:

Presumptuous for his method of taking a single fact out of context,
building a fantastical set of connections on it, then posturing as

an
expert, then on his erroneous single "fact" fantastically abusing
people who actually know what they're talking about, then, without
apology, excusing himself for "presuming" facts where there are

none.
On this basis this immoral slimeball called me a mass murderer!


Still wriggling on the hook, eh?

Pinko Presumptuous! Of course he is. It is impossible to defend such
unprincipled trash. Pinkerton imparts a stink to the good name of

the
vast majority of decent engineers.


How would you know, with your nose buried so deep in your own
excrement that you have to create a fawning band of sycophantic
sockpuppets to satisfy your desperate need for admiration? You are a
laughing stock, a bitter old man crying into his Guinness about the
good old days of putting 'fellows' up in front of firing squads.

Get professional help, NOW!
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering



Eiron March 25th 05 08:08 PM

On the guilt of UKRA in PInkerton's failed crusade Pinko
 
Andre,

Is your anecdote true about the Rolex, the South American gaoler
and the firing squad? Does the watch still keep good time?

--
Eiron.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk