"Andy Evans" goes on, in
uk.rec.audio1112101238.371107.161710@l41g2000cwc. googlegroups.com:
: RdM helpfully stated - I assume the latter is just Google groups beta,
: which you are using to post (AOL having dropped newsgroups lately!)
:
: Exactly so.
But the point was the *character set" you had in use on those posts...
I did note as an aside that the Google groups posting implied that you were
using a web browser (the proprietary AOL one perhaps?) to interface with it
and thus that the fault may lie within that or your other software's
interaction with it; ie when you paste sections of "text" [which, if it is
coming from a word processor or any form of "Rich" text, which it most
assuredly is if it has COLOURS associated with it, is NOT plain text] you have
these character encoding effects which do not transplant well to plain text.
Newsgroups are a plain text only medium (apart from binary groups) ...
: so perhaps the answer is within your PC, or web browser settings,
: specifically ... I have not seen this random? "?" effect in other beta
: Google groups posts.
:
: Yes - intersting. When I noticed it I deleted all the quote signs which
: as you say come out as question marks. I myself get some text in blue,
: and the paras are disconnected. also, text blocks which are quoted come
: out as simply the words text quoted. Anybody know any fixes to this -
: obviously a tick box somewhere in the works? Andy
THIS post (ie yours which I am replying to) has in its headers;
: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
and has NO "?" problems ... whereas ALL your [and "enough is indeed enough"!]
b book quotes have been encoded in "charset="utf-8"", sooo ... it seems QUITE
clear that the character encoding for those is the problem in the news posts.
"Sort yourself out" is perhaps not bad advice ...
I did suggest trying out an intermediary saving-as-text step, but ...
Others advice MONTHS ago has been to get a decent newsreader ...
In the face of this, we have forlorn oblique badly formatted postings of
obscure literature, and no evidence of any comprehension of the advice ;-)
Try out Agent
www.forteinc.com ... as a possibilty.
IMO you'll need help setting it up to optimum use (the defaults purge all
unread on every use, and have an annoying [IMO] 3-pane view) but if you
explore the options/preferences carefully you might do OK on your own...
Sing out if you do and want some input though ...
Others have suggested 40tude Dialog
http://www.40tude.com/dialog/ , but I've
found I prefer Agent - perhaps being used to it - after a brief look at it.
Perhaps I didn't spend enough time with it. YMMV. I might even look again.
Others might even have other, renewed, suggestions to follow ...
Whatever; get a decent newsreader that attributes quotes correctly and doesn't
spew badly formatted text, even if it has a wee learning curve, is my advice!
Oh! ... Perhaps then, you'd need to change ISP's, since AOL doesn't support
news at all any more? Not necessarily .. you could use a free news server, or
the recently free but now slight (10 euro/yr?)
www.individual.net 's server...
in Agent or etc; OTOH, why is a psychologist in London clinging to the use of
the almost universally derided AOL, AMERICA ON LINE, simply because it was
easy back then, or whatever the reason ...it's an abberation and oddity IMHO!
Changing ISP's may imply giving out a new email address to all your friends
and associates, but these things happen, just as with postal addresses ...
It might represent a new step in personal independence ... it's not impossible
.... and then you could use a standard (and standards observing) web browser as
well instead of proprietary AOL software and internet interface ... why not?
Forgive any residual semblances of irritation if you can; it's been a bad day!
[AAARRGH!!! ;=})] Ah, that feels better ...
RdM
insert witty reflective quote here