A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 12:53 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...


I'm expecting deliveries sometime today and therefore stuck within earshot
of the bloody doorbell on a lovely day like this, so here's another loopy
comparison....

This track ('normalised' mono MP3s) is very honky/horny to
counteract/compensate for (ie *hide*) the effects of open mic recording and
I like 'em both - one is my homebrew 2A3 amp on my homemade Pinkie speakers,
the other is the Dynavox amp on the Loths - all other considerations being
equal:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%20B.mp3

Anybody care to state a preference if only on a 'least worst' basis?


(One here will be interested to know the cart is *a* (not *the*) Shure
V15/III....)

:-)



  #2 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 02:03 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...

Keith G wrote:
I'm expecting deliveries sometime today and therefore stuck within earshot
of the bloody doorbell on a lovely day like this, so here's another loopy
comparison....

This track ('normalised' mono MP3s) is very honky/horny to
counteract/compensate for (ie *hide*) the effects of open mic recording and
I like 'em both - one is my homebrew 2A3 amp on my homemade Pinkie speakers,
the other is the Dynavox amp on the Loths - all other considerations being
equal:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%20B.mp3

Anybody care to state a preference if only on a 'least worst' basis?


Think I prefer 'B' - but that's just through the computer speakers.
Sounds as though it has more body, but they both sound pretty good to me
if a little 'chesty' - could be the recording?


(One here will be interested to know the cart is *a* (not *the*) Shure
V15/III....)

:-)


Don't wear it out!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 03:57 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...


"Rob" wrote


(One here will be interested to know the cart is *a* (not *the*) Shure
V15/III....)

:-)


Don't wear it out!




I said *a* V15/III not *the* V15/III...!!! ;-)

(Which is, as yet, still unfitted!!)




  #4 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 02:11 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:53:04 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


I'm expecting deliveries sometime today and therefore stuck within earshot
of the bloody doorbell on a lovely day like this, so here's another loopy
comparison....

This track ('normalised' mono MP3s) is very honky/horny to
counteract/compensate for (ie *hide*) the effects of open mic recording and
I like 'em both - one is my homebrew 2A3 amp on my homemade Pinkie speakers,
the other is the Dynavox amp on the Loths - all other considerations being
equal:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Track%20B.mp3

Anybody care to state a preference if only on a 'least worst' basis?


(One here will be interested to know the cart is *a* (not *the*) Shure
V15/III....)

:-)

Its B for me, has a more extended, less strained sound to it.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #5 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 03:55 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...


"Don Pearce" wrote


Its B for me, has a more extended, less strained sound to it.



OK gentleman, thanks for that. Now another *tough* one if you are up for it:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Piano%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Piano%20B.mp3

(Naming convention to be ignored - may or may not be 'as before'!! ;-)


The questions here are which one sounds most like a piano (if either one
does!) and which do you prefer?

I won't reveal the results just yet but will just say that I'm looking to
see if the purported triodes/horns 'synergy' is fact or fiction. The first
thing Pat From Around The Corner said when he heard the Pinks was that they
had 'brought the triodes alive' - meaning up 'til then he hadn't rated them,
I suppose!! ;-)

Also, *fact* - the Pinks are sounding better now than when they were brand
new (more bass) - wobbling my theories about speaker 'break-in' a bit!! (I'm
no less susceptible to 'psychology' than the next bloke, but this has got
bugger-all to do with building them - they are not even my 'ultimate goal'
speakers!! :-)




  #6 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 04:03 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...


"Keith G" wrote


Also, *fact* - the Pinks are sounding better now than when they were brand
new (more bass) - wobbling my theories about speaker 'break-in' a bit!!
(I'm no less susceptible to 'psychology' than the next bloke, but this has
got bugger-all to do with building them - they are not even my 'ultimate
goal' speakers!! :-)




Anyway, never mind the 'Lilies' (Pinks) - the 'Clarissas' are waiting in the
wings:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/needles/needles.htm (under construction)


....for the drivers which ain't showed up yet!!


  #7 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 04:07 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:55:42 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Don Pearce" wrote


Its B for me, has a more extended, less strained sound to it.



OK gentleman, thanks for that. Now another *tough* one if you are up for it:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Piano%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Piano%20B.mp3

(Naming convention to be ignored - may or may not be 'as before'!! ;-)


The questions here are which one sounds most like a piano (if either one
does!) and which do you prefer?

I won't reveal the results just yet but will just say that I'm looking to
see if the purported triodes/horns 'synergy' is fact or fiction. The first
thing Pat From Around The Corner said when he heard the Pinks was that they
had 'brought the triodes alive' - meaning up 'til then he hadn't rated them,
I suppose!! ;-)

Also, *fact* - the Pinks are sounding better now than when they were brand
new (more bass) - wobbling my theories about speaker 'break-in' a bit!! (I'm
no less susceptible to 'psychology' than the next bloke, but this has got
bugger-all to do with building them - they are not even my 'ultimate goal'
speakers!! :-)



OK - a bit less obvious this time, but I'm switching to A.

First thing I did was check the normalization, though, and knocked
half a dB off A to bring it better into line with B.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #8 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 04:52 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...

Keith G wrote:
"Don Pearce" wrote



Its B for me, has a more extended, less strained sound to it.




OK gentleman, thanks for that. Now another *tough* one if you are up for it:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Piano%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Piano%20B.mp3

(Naming convention to be ignored - may or may not be 'as before'!! ;-)


The questions here are which one sounds most like a piano (if either one
does!) and which do you prefer?

I won't reveal the results just yet but will just say that I'm looking to
see if the purported triodes/horns 'synergy' is fact or fiction. The first
thing Pat From Around The Corner said when he heard the Pinks was that they
had 'brought the triodes alive' - meaning up 'til then he hadn't rated them,
I suppose!! ;-)

Also, *fact* - the Pinks are sounding better now than when they were brand
new (more bass) - wobbling my theories about speaker 'break-in' a bit!! (I'm
no less susceptible to 'psychology' than the next bloke, but this has got
bugger-all to do with building them - they are not even my 'ultimate goal'
speakers!! :-)


Mmm - 'A' I think, a little less peaky, again more rounded.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 05:34 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...


"Rob" wrote


Mmm - 'A' I think, a little less peaky, again more rounded.



OK, I must congratulate both you and Don on your excellent taste and
judgement - you *both* picked the triodes/pinkies *both* times!! :-)


I had done a third pair:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Orleans%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Orleans%20B.mp3


But they are so overwhelmingly 'toilety' from the open mic recording they
are not pleasant - I'm pleased to say they sound quite a bit better 'live'!
Anyway, as I've done them, I've posted them and now forgotten which was
which - I think A is the triodes/pinkies!!

Many thanks for the feedback. Needless to say I'm delighted - I already
prefer the pinkies to the Loths myself, it's nice to get that 'backed up' to
a degree!! (Not exhaustive due to the different amps I know, but enough of
an indicator for me!)




  #10 (permalink)  
Old August 9th 05, 05:48 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default OK, another 'Honky Tonk' comparison...

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:34:11 +0100, "Keith G"
wrote:


"Rob" wrote


Mmm - 'A' I think, a little less peaky, again more rounded.



OK, I must congratulate both you and Don on your excellent taste and
judgement - you *both* picked the triodes/pinkies *both* times!! :-)


I had done a third pair:

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Orleans%20A.mp3

http://www.apah69.dsl.pipex.com/show/Orleans%20B.mp3


But they are so overwhelmingly 'toilety' from the open mic recording they
are not pleasant - I'm pleased to say they sound quite a bit better 'live'!
Anyway, as I've done them, I've posted them and now forgotten which was
which - I think A is the triodes/pinkies!!

Many thanks for the feedback. Needless to say I'm delighted - I already
prefer the pinkies to the Loths myself, it's nice to get that 'backed up' to
a degree!! (Not exhaustive due to the different amps I know, but enough of
an indicator for me!)




Well, you know what you need to do now - swap the speakers on the amps
and see which way the preference goes. Although of course this is
going to be 99.9% speakers.

d




Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.