Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

Yo, Pinkerton:

Since October 2004 you sent 4607 message to RAT, which is
rec.audio.tubes. You don't have a tube amp. Your expressed attitude to
tubes is that you hate them. Your total contribution after 4607
messages to a tube conference is generally agreed to be zero, in fact
negative. Most consider that you did this vile thing maliciously and
pettily.

If each of those messages took you only ten minutes to find and read
the post you responded to, to type and send you reply, that is 46070
minutes or 767 hours or over 50 hours every month to ruin other
people's glee in their hobby

What's your excuse?

Andre Jute

Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com
Yo, Pinkerton:

Since October 2004 you sent 4607 message to RAT, which is
rec.audio.tubes. You don't have a tube amp. Your
expressed attitude to tubes is that you hate them. Your
total contribution after 4607 messages to a tube
conference is generally agreed to be zero, in fact
negative. Most consider that you did this vile thing
maliciously and pettily.

If each of those messages took you only ten minutes to
find and read the post you responded to, to type and send
you reply, that is 46070 minutes or 767 hours or over 50
hours every month to ruin other people's glee in their
hobby

What's your excuse?

No excuse is needed for telling the truth in the face of hype and false
claims.

The so-called "glee with their hobby" is often pretty pathetic, as this post
fragment from rec.audio.pro illustrates:

"Unfortunately many people have somehow been led to believe that tubes
automatically impart some kind of magic fairy dust, so manufacturers
exploit that."

All this time that is wasted creating bad-sounding amps could be invested in
making good sounding (SS) amps.

The time could be spent other audio projects that are forward-looking as
opposed to backward-looking.

Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com
Yo, Pinkerton:

Since October 2004 you sent 4607 message to RAT, which is
rec.audio.tubes. You don't have a tube amp. Your
expressed attitude to tubes is that you hate them. Your
total contribution after 4607 messages to a tube
conference is generally agreed to be zero, in fact
negative. Most consider that you did this vile thing
maliciously and pettily.

If each of those messages took you only ten minutes to
find and read the post you responded to, to type and send
you reply, that is 46070 minutes or 767 hours or over 50
hours every month to ruin other people's glee in their
hobby

What's your excuse?

No excuse is needed for telling the truth in the face of hype and false
claims.

Only the most monumentally stupid and the most monumentally arrogant
people ever have such certainty in their own judgement as you and
Pinkerton exhibit, Krueger. Your determination to control through your
public nastiness the activities of people even in their harmless
hobbies is sociopathic.

I have already proved that you, Arnold Krueger, are so keen to make
yourself appear more important than you are that you will lash out
denigration to a group of people who did you no harm before the group
is even specified. This very post above to which you are responding
proves that Stewart Pinkerton is so keen to lash out pain to others
that he spends a quarter of his working life ruining the pleasure in
their hobby of posters to a tube conference where Pinkerton has
absolutely no business, where it has been repeatedly made clear to him
that he isn't wanted, where his attempt to prove that his way is better
(his dumb KISASS design) ended in a humilating failure, where his lies
are constantly exposed, where no secret is made of the fact that he is
despised for being scum to a greater extent even than you are.

The so-called "glee with their hobby" is often pretty pathetic, as this post
fragment from rec.audio.pro illustrates:

Who appointed you to decide which hobbies people may follow?

"Unfortunately many people have somehow been led to believe that tubes
automatically impart some kind of magic fairy dust, so manufacturers
exploit that."

So what? It's their business and their money. Why is it so disturbing
to you little control freaks that people hear something different from
you?

What has manufacturing hype to do with the DIYers on RAT? How does what
manufacturers do justify Pinkerton's foul manners and destructive
lunging around other people's hobbies? Or yours, for that matter,
Krueger?

It is truly sick for grown men to justify their existence (as you,
Arnold Krueger, and Stewart Pinkerton, repeatedly do, as you done again
above) by the disruption they bring to other people's innocent
pleasure.

All this time that is wasted creating bad-sounding amps could be invested in
making good sounding (SS) amps.

Who appointed you UberFuhrer of people's hi-fi?

The time could be spent other audio projects that are forward-looking as
opposed to backward-looking.

And approved by you and the equally arid, useless, uncultured, slimy,
ignorant, crude, unmannered, loutish, uncreative, dull, etc, Pinkerton?
No doubt after months of formfilling in quadriplicate and delays, you
will refuse to sanction even a little opamp gainclone if it is likely
to give anyone any pleasure. Thanks, but no thanks. We saw your sort of
control freaks in charge in the Soviet Union already; they ground it to
a halt. You and Pinkerton are harbingers of death, not of light and
life. You two, and your trail of goosestepping "engineers" and
hangerson, are a walking, talking nightmare to those of us who do hi-fi
for pleasure.

We live in a society where whatever is not forbidden by law is
expressly permitted by constitution and usage. And all the better for
it.

You are nor wanted in tube conferences, Krueger, Pinkerton, and all the
other control freak "engineers" on a crusade. So **** off.

Andre Jute

Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

We live in a society where whatever is not forbidden by law is
expressly permitted by constitution and usage. And all the better for
it.

Mr. McCoy:

So, does Ireland have a written constitution? England does not. In the
US, you would be referring to the 9th and 10th amendments (the "Bill of
Rights"). The issue being your use of the word "expressly" which
requires an explicit reference. But you are referring only to societies
based on English Law, vs. those based on Roman Law. So, those here from
France or Spain, and certain Parishes in Louisiana (US) and elsewhere
are subject to Roman Law, where the derivation of power is from the
state, and not from the people. You do come up with remarkably ignorant
analogies.

However, within Usenet, we almost all do have the privilege of calling
it as we see it. You do have a great deal of time on your hands and
have a lot of bile to spew. Enjoy. It must do you some good even if you
are entirely unconcerned over any collateral damage. I suppose a rich
and full fantasy life is marginally better than no life at all, but I
do pity you.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com
Yo, Pinkerton:

Since October 2004 you sent 4607 message to RAT, which
is rec.audio.tubes. You don't have a tube amp. Your
expressed attitude to tubes is that you hate them. Your
total contribution after 4607 messages to a tube
conference is generally agreed to be zero, in fact
negative. Most consider that you did this vile thing
maliciously and pettily.

If each of those messages took you only ten minutes to
find and read the post you responded to, to type and
send you reply, that is 46070 minutes or 767 hours or
over 50 hours every month to ruin other people's glee
in their hobby

What's your excuse?

No excuse is needed for telling the truth in the face of
hype and false claims.

Only the most monumentally stupid and the most
monumentally arrogant people ever have such certainty in
their own judgement as you and Pinkerton exhibit,
Krueger.

Training in the hard sciences may tend to increase one's propensities in
that direction. Learning that some things definately don't work, and others
definately do has this effect on one's thinking. That which is clear becomes
obvious.

Your determination to control through your
public nastiness the activities of people even in their
harmless hobbies is sociopathic.

Control??? Surely you Jest! I just post opinions like everybody else,
yourself included. People read or not, believe or not, act or not based on
their own thinking.

I have already proved that you, Arnold Krueger, are so
keen to make yourself appear more important than you are
that you will lash out denigration to a group of people
who did you no harm before the group is even specified.

Whatver that means.

This very post above to which you are responding proves
that Stewart Pinkerton is so keen to lash out pain to
others that he spends a quarter of his working life
ruining the pleasure in their hobby of posters to a tube
conference where Pinkerton has absolutely no business,
where it has been repeatedly made clear to him that he
isn't wanted, where his attempt to prove that his way is
better (his dumb KISASS design) ended in a humilating
failure, where his lies are constantly exposed, where no
secret is made of the fact that he is despised for being
scum to a greater extent even than you are.

Next time, you might not hold your feelings back!

The so-called "glee with their hobby" is often pretty
pathetic, as this post fragment from rec.audio.pro
illustrates:

Who appointed you to decide which hobbies people may
follow?

I have no such position, so no appointment is necessary.

"Unfortunately many people have somehow been led to
believe that tubes automatically impart some kind of
magic fairy dust, so manufacturers exploit that."

So what? It's their business and their money.


Right, so when people encounter diverse opinons, they can do their business
and spend their money as those diverse opinions affect their personal
opinions or not.

As we say in the US: "It's a free country". Of course we're not totally free
in the sense of anarchism, but we do have a fair amount of lattitude.

Why is it
so disturbing to you little control freaks that people
hear something different from you?

Disturbed? I'm sitting here smiling while you are obviously, again as we say
in the US: "Dancing on the ceiling".

What has manufacturing hype to do with the DIYers on RAT?

They appear to be customers for manufactured goods such as tubes,
transformers, and other electronic parts.

How does what manufacturers do justify Pinkerton's foul
manners and destructive lunging around other people's
hobbies? Or yours, for that matter, Krueger?

There's no need to justify that which we do not do.

It is truly sick for grown men to justify their existence
(as you, Arnold Krueger, and Stewart Pinkerton,
repeatedly do, as you done again above) by the disruption
they bring to other people's innocent pleasure.

Just the facts, ma'm. ;-)

All this time that is wasted creating bad-sounding amps
could be invested in making good sounding (SS) amps.

Who appointed you UberFuhrer of people's hi-fi?

No appointment is required for a position that I do not fill.

The time could be spent other audio projects that are
forward-looking as opposed to backward-looking.

And approved by you and the equally arid, useless,
uncultured, slimy, ignorant, crude, unmannered, loutish,
uncreative, dull, etc, Pinkerton?

There are no such persons, except in your fevered little mind, Jute or
whatever your name really is.

No doubt after months
of formfilling in quadriplicate and delays, you will
refuse to sanction even a little opamp gainclone if it is
likely to give anyone any pleasure.

Huh?

I did no such thing.

Thanks, but no
thanks. We saw your sort of control freaks in charge in
the Soviet Union already; they ground it to a halt. You
and Pinkerton are harbingers of death, not of light and
life. You two, and your trail of goosestepping
"engineers" and hangerson, are a walking, talking
nightmare to those of us who do hi-fi for pleasure.

What's wrong with doing hifi for pleasure in the context of modern
technology?

We live in a society where whatever is not forbidden by
law is expressly permitted by constitution and usage. And
all the better for it.

Works for me. One of the things that is not forbidden is posting my opinions
on various newsgroups. It's comforting to know that what I do is expressly
permitted by constitution and usage.


You are nor wanted in tube conferences, Krueger,
Pinkerton, and all the other control freak "engineers" on
a crusade. So **** off.

You seem upset Mr. Jute. Are we having a bad day? ;-)

Krooger and his hobbies
 

Andre Jute said to ****-for-Brains:

The so-called "glee with their hobby" is often pretty pathetic, as this post
fragment from rec.audio.pro illustrates:

Who appointed you to decide which hobbies people may follow?

Indeed. We do know some of the Krooborg's hobbies. For one, he spends most
of his waking hours inventing rationalizations for his consuming envy. The
Beast is envious of other people's material success (witness his whining
about being attacked by "millionaires"). He's also envious of others'
education, as shown by his compulsive "debating trade" hyping of his own
half-assed version of a BSEE. And when it comes to professional
accomplishments, one need only examine Turdborg's expletive-loaded attacks
on John Atkinson, Paul Bamborough, Glenn Zelniker, and Jim Johnston to see
how depraved Mr. **** is.

Even so, one might consider Krooger's conflagrations of envy to be just a
personality flaw, or perhaps a manifestation of his mental illness. To that
objection, I would counter that an even more inane hobby Mr. **** indulges
in is his crack-brained, phoney religiosity. On the one hand, he professes
to be a "Christian", but on the other, his behavior is as un-Christian as
you can get without commiting violent crimes. And what, I'd also ask, does
Krooger's devotion to superstition and flummery say about his professed
love of "science"? Actually I wouldn't ask because I already know.

Somebody recently suggested a few prescription drugs that might help
Krooger deal with his decayed mental faculties. Maybe Turdy can tell us if
he asked his doctor about them and whether he plans to get any
prescriptions that will enable him to move a little closer to the real
world.

Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

Peter Wieck said:

the 9th and 10th amendments (the "Bill of Rights")
[snip]
You do come up with remarkably ignorant analogies.

Once again, from the top, please.

Stewart Pinkerton's positive contribution
 

On 23 Feb 2006 05:31:40 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

Yo, Pinkerton:

Since October 2004 you sent 4607 message to RAT, which is
rec.audio.tubes. You don't have a tube amp. Your expressed attitude to
tubes is that you hate them.

That is of course just a typical Jute lie. I regard tube amps as
overpriced for their performance, but certainly *capable* of excellent
performance. SET amps are another matter.

Your total contribution after 4607
messages to a tube conference is generally agreed to be zero, in fact
negative.

Actually, I think I've done a fine job of pointing out the many errors
in your incompetent KISS articles - after sifting through the 99% of
waffle surrounding the actual content.

Most consider that you did this vile thing maliciously and
pettily.

'Most' would be *you*, or are you counting your merry band of
sycophantic sockpuppets?

If each of those messages took you only ten minutes to find and read
the post you responded to, to type and send you reply, that is 46070
minutes or 767 hours or over 50 hours every month to ruin other
people's glee in their hobby

I type faster than that, probably less than 10 hours a month, or 25
minutes a day, helping others to avoid your incompetence.

What's your excuse?

I don't need one. What's your excuse for creating dozens of pure
attack threads in what is supposed to be an audio forum?
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

On 23 Feb 2006 06:50:18 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

Only the most monumentally stupid and the most monumentally arrogant
people ever have such certainty in their own judgement as you and
Pinkerton exhibit, Krueger.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

I nearly blew my coffee all over the screen. Do you never read your
own arrogant, pretentious and self-aggrandising drivel?

You are nor wanted in tube conferences, Krueger, Pinkerton, and all the
other control freak "engineers" on a crusade. So **** off.

Oh, we may not be *wanted* by incompetent self-important dilettantes
such as yourself, but we're certainly *needed*, if only to point out
your numerous errors.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

Stewart Pinkerton's negative contribution
 

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states
respectively, or to the people.

There it is, George. In writing and not in Mr. McCoy's inflamed
imagination. No sin not to know this, most Americans don't, for sure.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA