![]() |
SET in my ways...
Here's an interesting and well-written article that should have the AntiSEpTics foaming at one or more of their body orifices: http://www.stereophile.com/tubepoweramps/196wavelength/ This bit is particularly interesting: "Then there's the interesting issue of distortion products. SETs include even- and odd-order distortion products in their outputs (as in nature, so to speak), while push-pull circuits cancel out even-order distortion by design, leaving only the less musical odd-order products intact. Now look...there's something to this. It's suggested that the sound of single-ended triodes has much to do with their delivery-intact-of the full spectrum of distortion products. "More distortion is better?" I hear you ask. Well, it's less humorous than it sounds. Might "unnatural" proportions of odd-order distortion account for part of the sound of push-pull? Something to think about." .... and should be read by those here who are continuing to confuse the radically different terms 'realistic' and 'accurate'.. |
SET in my ways...
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:17:00 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote: Here's an interesting and well-written article that should have the AntiSEpTics foaming at one or more of their body orifices: http://www.stereophile.com/tubepoweramps/196wavelength/ This bit is particularly interesting: "Then there's the interesting issue of distortion products. SETs include even- and odd-order distortion products in their outputs (as in nature, so to speak), while push-pull circuits cancel out even-order distortion by design, leaving only the less musical odd-order products intact. Now look...there's something to this. It's suggested that the sound of single-ended triodes has much to do with their delivery-intact-of the full spectrum of distortion products. "More distortion is better?" I hear you ask. Well, it's less humorous than it sounds. Might "unnatural" proportions of odd-order distortion account for part of the sound of push-pull? Something to think about." ... and should be read by those here who are continuing to confuse the radically different terms 'realistic' and 'accurate'.. But I hope you didn't miss this bit: "The Tweak Gallery was full. Three Shun Mook Mpingo discs on top of each speaker, left at 7 o'clock, right side pointed to 5. I also placed one Mpingo on the top cover of each amp in front of the rectifier tube, where there was some open real estate. The balance of the room treatments were as described in June's "A Matter of Taste" Sums up the mood of the article quite nicely. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
SET in my ways...
"Keith G" wrote in message ... Here's an interesting and well-written article that should have the AntiSEpTics foaming at one or more of their body orifices: http://www.stereophile.com/tubepoweramps/196wavelength/ This bit is particularly interesting: "Then there's the interesting issue of distortion products. SETs include even- and odd-order distortion products in their outputs (as in nature, so to speak), while push-pull circuits cancel out even-order distortion by design, leaving only the less musical odd-order products intact. Now look...there's something to this. It's suggested that the sound of single-ended triodes has much to do with their delivery-intact-of the full spectrum of distortion products. "More distortion is better?" I hear you ask. Well, it's less humorous than it sounds. Might "unnatural" proportions of odd-order distortion account for part of the sound of push-pull? Something to think about." ... and should be read by those here who are continuing to confuse the radically different terms 'realistic' and 'accurate'.. Just my mouth was foaming...... Even and odd distortion products in nature? What's he talking about? Play a violin in the open air, what distortion does the air create that the microphone doesn't pick up? Yes, I know air isn't linear at very high levels, you can compress air as much as you like, but you can't rarefy more than one atmosphere, but by the time you get to measurable let alone audible distortion levels, you would be dead! However, whatever distortion levels exist in the air, the microphone would pick up. So, what's he talking about? As to the silver wire and other exotic components, come off it! If you like the amounts of distortions coming off a SET fine, but don't pretend it's accurate. (or realistic) S. S. |
SET in my ways...
In article , Keith G
wrote: Here's an interesting and well-written article that should have the AntiSEpTics foaming at one or more of their body orifices: http://www.stereophile.com/tubepoweramps/196wavelength/ This bit is particularly interesting: "Then there's the interesting issue of distortion products. SETs include even- and odd-order distortion products in their outputs (as in nature, so to speak), while push-pull circuits cancel out even-order distortion by design, leaving only the less musical odd-order products intact. Now look...there's something to this. It's suggested that the sound of single-ended triodes has much to do with their delivery-intact-of the full spectrum of distortion products. The problem with the above is twofold: 1) It confuses an alteration of an existing sound with the original. 2) It ignores intermod when more than one note is being played. The "suggestion" is, I think, a fairly old one. Alas, it makes little sense in practice... Unless the argument is simply that some people like intermodulation distortion. :-) Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
SET in my ways...
"Serge Auckland" wrote Just my mouth was foaming...... Even and odd distortion products in nature? What's he talking about? Play a violin in the open air, what distortion does the air create that the microphone doesn't pick up? Yes, I know air isn't linear at very high levels, you can compress air as much as you like, but you can't rarefy more than one atmosphere, but by the time you get to measurable let alone audible distortion levels, you would be dead! However, whatever distortion levels exist in the air, the microphone would pick up. So, what's he talking about? **** knows - I don't actually read that sort of crap, as anyone here will tell you - I Google a key phrase, then scan-read (or Ctrl F) for salient points relative to the topic in hand. (It's a common enough procedure used by a few here, but I usually just point to it, I don't claim it as prior knowledge as some others do....!! ;-) As to the silver wire and other exotic components, come off it! If you like the amounts of distortions coming off a SET fine, but don't pretend it's accurate. (or realistic) Don't hit me with the 'accuracy' stick Serge - I don't give a rat's about accuracy over sound quality and have *never* made any claims concerning it. I *do* know what I perceive to be more *realistic*, however.... |
SET in my ways...
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:17:00 -0000, "Keith G"
wrote: Here's an interesting and well-written article that should have the AntiSEpTics foaming at one or more of their body orifices: http://www.stereophile.com/tubepoweramps/196wavelength/ This bit is particularly interesting: "Then there's the interesting issue of distortion products. SETs include even- and odd-order distortion products in their outputs (as in nature, so to speak), while push-pull circuits cancel out even-order distortion by design, leaving only the less musical odd-order products intact. Now look...there's something to this. It's suggested that the sound of single-ended triodes has much to do with their delivery-intact-of the full spectrum of distortion products. "More distortion is better?" I hear you ask. Well, it's less humorous than it sounds. Might "unnatural" proportions of odd-order distortion account for part of the sound of push-pull? Something to think about." ... and should be read by those here who are continuing to confuse the radically different terms 'realistic' and 'accurate'.. However, if you examine the distortion spectra of many good SS amplifiers (carefully, because it's very small anyway), you frequently find that the output distortion is dominated by the single-ended voltage amplifier stage, so you have a decreasing low-order spectrum dropping rapidly below the noise floor. The difference with SETs is that you have a decreasing low-order distortion spectrum which is well above the noise floor. This nonlinearity also produces high levels of intermodulation distortion which do nothing but muddy the sound. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
SET in my ways...
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:17:00 -0000, "Keith G" wrote: Here's an interesting and well-written article that should have the AntiSEpTics foaming at one or more of their body orifices: http://www.stereophile.com/tubepoweramps/196wavelength/ This bit is particularly interesting: "Then there's the interesting issue of distortion products. SETs include even- and odd-order distortion products in their outputs (as in nature, so to speak), while push-pull circuits cancel out even-order distortion by design, leaving only the less musical odd-order products intact. Now look...there's something to this. It's suggested that the sound of single-ended triodes has much to do with their delivery-intact-of the full spectrum of distortion products. "More distortion is better?" I hear you ask. Well, it's less humorous than it sounds. Might "unnatural" proportions of odd-order distortion account for part of the sound of push-pull? Something to think about." ... and should be read by those here who are continuing to confuse the radically different terms 'realistic' and 'accurate'.. However, if you examine the distortion spectra of many good SS amplifiers (carefully, because it's very small anyway), you frequently find that the output distortion is dominated by the single-ended voltage amplifier stage, so you have a decreasing low-order spectrum dropping rapidly below the noise floor. The difference with SETs is that you have a decreasing low-order distortion spectrum which is well above the noise floor. This nonlinearity also produces high levels of intermodulation distortion which do nothing but muddy the sound. There are any number of interesting sites that deal with distortion in triodes like this one: http://www.triodeel.com/ptnotes.htm Who knows? One day I might even get round to reading some of them, but until I know better I'll stick with a sound which is (IMO) anything *but* muddy.... |
SET in my ways...
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "Serge Auckland" wrote Just my mouth was foaming...... Even and odd distortion products in nature? What's he talking about? Play a violin in the open air, what distortion does the air create that the microphone doesn't pick up? Yes, I know air isn't linear at very high levels, you can compress air as much as you like, but you can't rarefy more than one atmosphere, but by the time you get to measurable let alone audible distortion levels, you would be dead! However, whatever distortion levels exist in the air, the microphone would pick up. So, what's he talking about? **** knows - I don't actually read that sort of crap, as anyone here will tell you - I Google a key phrase, then scan-read (or Ctrl F) for salient points relative to the topic in hand. (It's a common enough procedure used by a few here, but I usually just point to it, I don't claim it as prior knowledge as some others do....!! ;-) As to the silver wire and other exotic components, come off it! If you like the amounts of distortions coming off a SET fine, but don't pretend it's accurate. (or realistic) Don't hit me with the 'accuracy' stick Serge - I don't give a rat's about accuracy over sound quality and have *never* made any claims concerning it. I *do* know what I perceive to be more *realistic*, however.... Sorry, but I *was* foaming a bit. I was aiming my comments at the writer. S. |
SET in my ways...
"Serge Auckland" wrote As to the silver wire and other exotic components, come off it! If you like the amounts of distortions coming off a SET fine, but don't pretend it's accurate. (or realistic) Don't hit me with the 'accuracy' stick Serge - I don't give a rat's about accuracy over sound quality and have *never* made any claims concerning it. I *do* know what I perceive to be more *realistic*, however.... Sorry, but I *was* foaming a bit. I was aiming my comments at the writer. :-) As I said to you - not being a designer or manufacturer, I'm much more interested in the 'sound' than the signal per se., but obviously, I *do* regard the sound I'm getting these days with SETs as being more *realistic* (as well as more pleasant) or I quite simply wouldn't bother with them..... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk