WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT). Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project. Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time. He told us that the purpose
was to expose my ignorance and prevent others following in my
footsteps. His 4607 posts were all abusive. Only one, considered below,
was electronically specific enough for me to consider comparing it to
what I had published. As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, not a
single line of the booklength KISS materials was altered, not a single
fact was altered, not a single schematic was altered in the slightest.
As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, no party interested in the
KISS project in the beginning dropped out, and no one who became
interested during its course was deterred in the slightest.
Pinkerton's 4607 vicious posts gave him great satisfaction, according
to him, but had no other result whatsoever (except to make
Pinkerton's name a byword for barbaric insensitivity and foul
manners). In all Pinkerton's 4607 posts counted here, he did not once
analyze the circuit of the amp he objected to while it stood for more
than a year on public view. By contrast to Pinkerton's vicious and
loud slackness, Patrick Turner analyzed the circuit and made
suggestions which were incorporated, and John Byrns made another
important suggestion which we shall shortly discuss and then
incorporate because I have already tested it. From Pinkerton all this
while, zero. In short, Pinkerton's claim of my ignorance is a sham,
an excuse for him to indulge his malicious urge to bring pain to
everyone else, 4607 times in 15 months on a single newsgroup.

Andre Jute

Part of a series of articles:
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
1. BACKGROUND
2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
3. PINKERTON'S IGNORANCE OF THE BASICS
4. PINKERTON LIES ON PROFESSIONAL MATTERS FOR PERSONAL REASONS
5. CONCLUSION

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com...
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT).

Translation: Jute said he was going to start a project called KISS so that
he could perhaps impress some of the SET lovers with yet another example of
a ****ty sounding amp.

Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project.

Translation: Jute took somebody else's design from a book he read and
claimed it was his own and when Stewart saw what a piece of crap it was said
he could build a similarly simple SS amp.

Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.

Based on teh math of someone with not only way to much free time, but
someone who apparently can't type very fast.

He told us that the purpose
was to expose my ignorance and prevent others following in my
footsteps.

Tranlation: Stewart was going to expose Jute's ignorance and try to prevent
others from following in Jute's footsteps.

His 4607 posts were all abusive.

Unlike Jute's posts which are complete crap.

Only one, considered below,
was electronically specific enough for me to consider comparing it to
what I had published.

IOW, it was the only one simpleenough for you to understand.

As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, not a
single line of the booklength KISS materials was altered, not a single
fact was altered, not a single schematic was altered in the slightest.

IOW, Jute didn't change a thing bcause he didn't have another book to copy
from.

As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, no party interested in the
KISS project in the beginning dropped out, and no one who became
interested during its course was deterred in the slightest.

IOW, nobody built the KISS amp, not even Jute.

Pinkerton's 4607 vicious posts gave him great satisfaction, according
to him, but had no other result whatsoever (except to make
Pinkerton's name a byword for barbaric insensitivity and foul
manners).

IOW, Jute was shown for the incompetent boob that everybody already knew he
was.

In all Pinkerton's 4607 posts counted here, he did not once
analyze the circuit of the amp he objected to while it stood for more
than a year on public view.

Something you couldn't possibly know.

By contrast to Pinkerton's vicious and
loud slackness, Patrick Turner analyzed the circuit and made
suggestions which were incorporated, and John Byrns made another
important suggestion which we shall shortly discuss and then
incorporate because I have already tested it.

After how long? A year? Two?

From Pinkerton all this
while, zero. In short, Pinkerton's claim of my ignorance is a sham,
an excuse for him to indulge his malicious urge to bring pain to
everyone else, 4607 times in 15 months on a single newsgroup.

IOW Stewart designed and built his KISS Ass amp and then waited for Jute to
build his. Finally he posted a picture of the amp which was shown to have
been taken just a few days ago and not at the time Jute claims he built it.

By the way McCoy I just won $5000.00 betting that you would launch yet
another tirade against Stewart.

wrote:

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com...
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT).

Translation: Jute said he was going to start a project called KISS so that
he could perhaps impress some of the SET lovers with yet another example of
a ****ty sounding amp.

Unfortunately for you, SET amps are not necessarily ****ty sounding.
At rec.audio.tubes, ppl are expected to be positively interestested in tube
craft,
rather than have a destructive agenda.

Stewart Pinkerton, aka Oinkerton the Pig, is like somebody who would join in
discussions
at rec.radio.amateur.homebrew by trying to tell all the assembled hobbyists and
other
commercial interested folks there that they are a stupid bunch of fools because
they
dare to build their own radio gear when of course it is easier and more
effective to use the Internet
to transfer information.





Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project.

Translation: Jute took somebody else's design from a book he read and
claimed it was his own and when Stewart saw what a piece of crap it was said
he could build a similarly simple SS amp.

What does onw call one's own amp that one builds? One calls it one's own.
It may be almost identical to other designs, but it is the amp that Andre built,

and Andre has a right to say it is his, so ppl know that, and know the
differences between it and anyone else's design.

Pinkerton failed to establish why Andre's amp was a piece of crap,
and failed quite miserably to build anything better, and durung the process
rightly earned his nickname as Oinkerton, because his attidude was
the same as a person insisting he sell pork in a synogogue.





Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.

Based on teh math of someone with not only way to much free time, but
someone who apparently can't type very fast.

Andre simply points out the fact that Oinkerton posted a pile of many unwanted,
unappreciated
and idiotic posts at rec.audio.tubes.
I don't know if Oinkerton posted 46, 460, 4,600 times.
But he did post a great amount of ****, none of which earned him the slightest
amount of
respect amounf the few here with a real interest in tube craft of amoung the
closit
solderers who build home brew solid state gear.



He told us that the purpose
was to expose my ignorance and prevent others following in my
footsteps.

Tranlation: Stewart was going to expose Jute's ignorance and try to prevent
others from following in Jute's footsteps.

But Oinkerton's ignorance is far worse, and anyone following in his footsteps
will get bogged
and smelly so much faster than if you followed in Andre's steps.





His 4607 posts were all abusive.

Unlike Jute's posts which are complete crap.

Oinkerton is anti tubecraft, Andre is pro-tubecraft.

Thius is a tube craft group; rec.audio.tubes is its title.

if you cannot or will not contribute positively to tube craft
then **** off.



Only one, considered below,
was electronically specific enough for me to consider comparing it to
what I had published.

IOW, it was the only one simpleenough for you to understand.

As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, not a
single line of the booklength KISS materials was altered, not a single
fact was altered, not a single schematic was altered in the slightest.

IOW, Jute didn't change a thing bcause he didn't have another book to copy
from.

Jute's circuit works. There was no reason for him to change anything.

Before you so stupidly try to convince us Andre is merely copying out what he
found in a book,
please provide evidence to support your alegations.
From which book did Andre copy his info from?



As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, no party interested in the
KISS project in the beginning dropped out, and no one who became
interested during its course was deterred in the slightest.

IOW, nobody built the KISS amp, not even Jute.

Pinkerton's 4607 vicious posts gave him great satisfaction, according
to him, but had no other result whatsoever (except to make
Pinkerton's name a byword for barbaric insensitivity and foul
manners).

IOW, Jute was shown for the incompetent boob that everybody already knew he
was.

Not correct.
Oinkerton admitted before ceasing to post at rec.audio tubes for some months
that
he hadn't built the supposedly simple SS amp he had designed.
He had no intention to build a working sample, test it honestly, post the
results,
and do so all without posting personally inflamatatory comments about the
300B amp.

To anyone reading r.a.t who has an IQ above 50, Oinkerton seems to come across
as a
complete jerk.

Andre may be wordy, and long winded, but he's fundementally here for the tubes.
He has a flair for demolishing ppl like Oinkerton, something Oinkerton begs for.

Unfortunately, the argy bargy between the two doesn't look good to the fragiles
who come here
to talk tubes, they go away, seeking safer refuges where their opinions won't be

attacked by jerks like Oinkerton.

Oinkerton's presence s has degraded what might otherwise be a good discussion
group.
Despite this time of year being cool in the northern hemisphre with ppl mainly
locked indoors
with their hobbies at least at night, hardly anyone is building gear and
discussing the experiences
here like they used to.
One reaon is that Oinketon and his sympathisers are too everpresent.

Oinkerton would be immediately banned, filtered out, kill filed in any moderated
group.



In all Pinkerton's 4607 posts counted here, he did not once
analyze the circuit of the amp he objected to while it stood for more
than a year on public view.

Something you couldn't possibly know.

By contrast to Pinkerton's vicious and
loud slackness, Patrick Turner analyzed the circuit and made
suggestions which were incorporated, and John Byrns made another
important suggestion which we shall shortly discuss and then
incorporate because I have already tested it.

After how long? A year? Two?

And what exactly is your analysis?

Just what informative and useful point are you trying to make?



From Pinkerton all this
while, zero. In short, Pinkerton's claim of my ignorance is a sham,
an excuse for him to indulge his malicious urge to bring pain to
everyone else, 4607 times in 15 months on a single newsgroup.

IOW Stewart designed and built his KISS Ass amp and then waited for Jute to
build his. Finally he posted a picture of the amp which was shown to have
been taken just a few days ago and not at the time Jute claims he built it.

By the way McCoy I just won $5000.00 betting that you would launch yet
another tirade against Stewart.

But you made yourself look like a complete loser.

Feel welcome to collect the 5 grand.

Exactly what contributions to tube craft are you going to make?

Patrick Turner.

"Patrick Turner" wrote in message
...


wrote:

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com...
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT).

Translation: Jute said he was going to start a project called KISS so
that
he could perhaps impress some of the SET lovers with yet another example
of
a ****ty sounding amp.

Unfortunately for you, SET amps are not necessarily ****ty sounding.
Once you get past the first watt, they are essentiually distorion
generators.

At rec.audio.tubes, ppl are expected to be positively interestested in
tube
craft,
rather than have a destructive agenda.

Then Mr. Mcoy should confine his complaints to that NG instead of
crossposting to every audio group in the known universe.

Stewart Pinkerton, aka Oinkerton the Pig, is like somebody who would join
in
discussions
at rec.radio.amateur.homebrew by trying to tell all the assembled
hobbyists and
other
commercial interested folks there that they are a stupid bunch of fools
because
they
dare to build their own radio gear when of course it is easier and more
effective to use the Internet
to transfer information.

No, Stewart Pinkerton is a qualified EE who has forgotten more about audio
design, than Mr. McCoy will ever learn. He likes to debunk crap such as the
KISS amp because he knows it to be junk and because he doesn't think people
should lie about things being their own desing, whent hey cribbed them from
elsewhere.





Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project.

Translation: Jute took somebody else's design from a book he read and
claimed it was his own and when Stewart saw what a piece of crap it was
said
he could build a similarly simple SS amp.

What does onw call one's own amp that one builds? One calls it one's own.

I guess that would be fair if the ****ing thing ever got built. Instead of
pretending that it was built a year ago, instead of posting a picture that
was taken only a few days ago and trying to pretend that it was taken many
months ago, to prove that the amp was built them instead of recently.

Pinkerton and many others have debunked that little tidbit and still
Jute/McCoy/Munchausen is pretending that it isn't so.

It may be almost identical to other designs, but it is the amp that Andre
built,

and Andre has a right to say it is his, so ppl know that, and know the
differences between it and anyone else's design.

Pinkerton failed to establish why Andre's amp was a piece of crap,
and failed quite miserably to build anything better, and durung the
process
rightly earned his nickname as Oinkerton, because his attidude was
the same as a person insisting he sell pork in a synogogue.

He didn't fail to do that, he's been spelling it out for months.



Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.

Based on teh math of someone with not only way to much free time, but
someone who apparently can't type very fast.

Andre simply points out the fact that Oinkerton posted a pile of many
unwanted,
unappreciated
and idiotic posts at rec.audio.tubes.

Which is a public forum, if you don't want other people critique-ing your
stuff don't post there or killfile the people you don't want to hear from.
The fact is that McCoy likes the attention and it's basically the reason he
posts at all.

I don't know if Oinkerton posted 46, 460, 4,600 times.
But he did post a great amount of ****, none of which earned him the
slightest
amount of
respect amounf the few here with a real interest in tube craft of amoung
the
closit
solderers who build home brew solid state gear.

So far only McCoy and you (his sockpuppet) have complained about it.

You said to NYOB:
Before you so stupidly try to convince us Andre is merely copying out what he
found in a book,
please provide evidence to support your alegations.
From which book did Andre copy his info from?


Stupidity is only one part of it. This insolent loudmouth
learnt his huckster manners in his time as a hifi salesman.
Permit me to quote myself:
Quote #! 1 " He repeats his favourite gambit at least once a week:
The "all the rest of the researchers " (meaning "me and all the
rest"? Black humour?) and "manufacturers" are crazy about
ABX.
He polled " all the manufacturers" in his hifi shop sales days
and asked "all the rest" of the researchers ie those who
didn/t show him the door if they use ABX weekly daily or
every minute of their life.
And he offers this fool-proof statistical miracle to everyone
free of charge.
He rests his case.

Quote #2 NYOB has a revelation for the world of medicine:
I haven't participated in any medical ABX testing either, but I don't want
any new meds that weren't.


Regretfully he ommitted the full details of his epoch-making
discovery.
Presumably it goes something like this:
First researcher:"This guy has bacterial endocarditis.
If he doesn't get penicillin he's sure to die"
2nd researcher: "But I got funded to find out if this new drug works.
Let's give him one week of penicillin and then one week of my drug. If
at the end of two
weeks he's still alive we'll give him one or the other and ask him
which one
was it most like Penicillin or my new one"
"Great. Now we're really making waves"
This, and I'm weighing my words, functional illiterate
promises
to correct blind fate's error. If he refuses any medication that was
not
ABX tested he will make good a DNA mistake. Because a medication
tested by ABX does not exist.
Ludovic Mirabel

Patrick Turner wrote:
wrote:

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com...
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT).

Translation: Jute said he was going to start a project called KISS so that
he could perhaps impress some of the SET lovers with yet another example of
a ****ty sounding amp.

Unfortunately for you, SET amps are not necessarily ****ty sounding.
At rec.audio.tubes, ppl are expected to be positively interestested in tube
craft,
rather than have a destructive agenda.

Stewart Pinkerton, aka Oinkerton the Pig, is like somebody who would join in
discussions
at rec.radio.amateur.homebrew by trying to tell all the assembled hobbyists and
other
commercial interested folks there that they are a stupid bunch of fools because
they
dare to build their own radio gear when of course it is easier and more
effective to use the Internet
to transfer information.





Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project.

Translation: Jute took somebody else's design from a book he read and
claimed it was his own and when Stewart saw what a piece of crap it was said
he could build a similarly simple SS amp.

What does onw call one's own amp that one builds? One calls it one's own.
It may be almost identical to other designs, but it is the amp that Andre built,

and Andre has a right to say it is his, so ppl know that, and know the
differences between it and anyone else's design.

Pinkerton failed to establish why Andre's amp was a piece of crap,
and failed quite miserably to build anything better, and durung the process
rightly earned his nickname as Oinkerton, because his attidude was
the same as a person insisting he sell pork in a synogogue.





Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.

Based on teh math of someone with not only way to much free time, but
someone who apparently can't type very fast.

Andre simply points out the fact that Oinkerton posted a pile of many unwanted,
unappreciated
and idiotic posts at rec.audio.tubes.
I don't know if Oinkerton posted 46, 460, 4,600 times.
But he did post a great amount of ****, none of which earned him the slightest
amount of
respect amounf the few here with a real interest in tube craft of amoung the
closit
solderers who build home brew solid state gear.



He told us that the purpose
was to expose my ignorance and prevent others following in my
footsteps.

Tranlation: Stewart was going to expose Jute's ignorance and try to prevent
others from following in Jute's footsteps.

But Oinkerton's ignorance is far worse, and anyone following in his footsteps
will get bogged
and smelly so much faster than if you followed in Andre's steps.





His 4607 posts were all abusive.

Unlike Jute's posts which are complete crap.

Oinkerton is anti tubecraft, Andre is pro-tubecraft.

Thius is a tube craft group; rec.audio.tubes is its title.

if you cannot or will not contribute positively to tube craft
then **** off.



Only one, considered below,
was electronically specific enough for me to consider comparing it to
what I had published.

IOW, it was the only one simpleenough for you to understand.

As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, not a
single line of the booklength KISS materials was altered, not a single
fact was altered, not a single schematic was altered in the slightest.

IOW, Jute didn't change a thing bcause he didn't have another book to copy
from.

Jute's circuit works. There was no reason for him to change anything.

Before you so stupidly try to convince us Andre is merely copying out what he
found in a book,
please provide evidence to support your alegations.
From which book did Andre copy his info from?



As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, no party interested in the
KISS project in the beginning dropped out, and no one who became
interested during its course was deterred in the slightest.

IOW, nobody built the KISS amp, not even Jute.

Pinkerton's 4607 vicious posts gave him great satisfaction, according
to him, but had no other result whatsoever (except to make
Pinkerton's name a byword for barbaric insensitivity and foul
manners).

IOW, Jute was shown for the incompetent boob that everybody already knew he
was.

Not correct.
Oinkerton admitted before ceasing to post at rec.audio tubes for some months
that
he hadn't built the supposedly simple SS amp he had designed.
He had no intention to build a working sample, test it honestly, post the
results,
and do so all without posting personally inflamatatory comments about the
300B amp.

To anyone reading r.a.t who has an IQ above 50, Oinkerton seems to come across
as a
complete jerk.

Andre may be wordy, and long winded, but he's fundementally here for the tubes.
He has a flair for demolishing ppl like Oinkerton, something Oinkerton begs for.

Unfortunately, the argy bargy between the two doesn't look good to the fragiles
who come here
to talk tubes, they go away, seeking safer refuges where their opinions won't be

attacked by jerks like Oinkerton.

Oinkerton's presence s has degraded what might otherwise be a good discussion
group.
Despite this time of year being cool in the northern hemisphre with ppl mainly
locked indoors
with their hobbies at least at night, hardly anyone is building gear and
discussing the experiences
here like they used to.
One reaon is that Oinketon and his sympathisers are too everpresent.

Oinkerton would be immediately banned, filtered out, kill filed in any moderated
group.



In all Pinkerton's 4607 posts counted here, he did not once
analyze the circuit of the amp he objected to while it stood for more
than a year on public view.

Something you couldn't possibly know.

By contrast to Pinkerton's vicious and
loud slackness, Patrick Turner analyzed the circuit and made
suggestions which were incorporated, and John Byrns made another
important suggestion which we shall shortly discuss and then
incorporate because I have already tested it.

After how long? A year? Two?

And what exactly is your analysis?

Just what informative and useful point are you trying to make?



From Pinkerton all this
while, zero. In short, Pinkerton's claim of my ignorance is a sham,
an excuse for him to indulge his malicious urge to bring pain to
everyone else, 4607 times in 15 months on a single newsgroup.

IOW Stewart designed and built his KISS Ass amp and then waited for Jute to
build his. Finally he posted a picture of the amp which was shown to have
been taken just a few days ago and not at the time Jute claims he built it.

By the way McCoy I just won $5000.00 betting that you would launch yet
another tirade against Stewart.

But you made yourself look like a complete loser.

Feel welcome to collect the 5 grand.

Exactly what contributions to tube craft are you going to make?

Patrick Turner.

On 2 Mar 2006 15:50:23 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT). Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project. Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.

Psychotic rants ignored out of pity, but one point noted: Every one of
my posts on this subject was matched by a significantly longer one
from Jute, and he is the one who keeps creating pure attack threads,
as he did right from my very first post on KISS. Interested readers
can draw the obvious conclusions regarding psychotic fixations.

Given that I know how much time I spend at my keyboard (about an hour
a day *total*), I also doubt the 4607 figure. God knows how much time
he's going to devote to this current series of psychotic attacks.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 2 Mar 2006 15:50:23 -0800, "Andre Jute" wrote:

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT). Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project. Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time.

Psychotic rants ignored out of pity, but one point noted: Every one of
my posts on this subject was matched by a significantly longer one
from Jute, and he is the one who keeps creating pure attack threads,
as he did right from my very first post on KISS. Interested readers
can draw the obvious conclusions regarding psychotic fixations.

Given that I know how much time I spend at my keyboard (about an hour
a day *total*), I also doubt the 4607 figure. God knows how much time
he's going to devote to this current series of psychotic attacks.
--

When I did a Google search for the words Andre, Jute, McCoy, with you as the
author, I only got 2000 total. Of course that could mean that many of them
simply had mention of his name and were not neccessarily posts that warned
people about how incompetent he is. They could have simply been warnings of
his Muchausen disease and why people should not take him too seriously.
Either way it simply more evidence that he counts about as well as designs
amps. :-)

Andre Jute wrote:

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
In the latter part of 2004, at the request of leading members, I
started a major project called KISS on rec.audio.tubes (RAT). Pinkerton
arrived and announced he would deconstruct the project. Between the
beginning of October 2004 and the middle of February 2006 he sent 4607
messages to RAT, a labour conservatively estimated to have taken him
767 hours, or more than a quarter of his working hours in the same
period, the major part of his free time. He told us that the purpose
was to expose my ignorance and prevent others following in my
footsteps. His 4607 posts were all abusive. Only one, considered below,
was electronically specific enough for me to consider comparing it to
what I had published. As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, not a
single line of the booklength KISS materials was altered, not a single
fact was altered, not a single schematic was altered in the slightest.
As the result of Pinkerton's 4607 posts, no party interested in the
KISS project in the beginning dropped out, and no one who became
interested during its course was deterred in the slightest.
Pinkerton's 4607 vicious posts gave him great satisfaction, according
to him, but had no other result whatsoever (except to make
Pinkerton's name a byword for barbaric insensitivity and foul
manners). In all Pinkerton's 4607 posts counted here, he did not once
analyze the circuit of the amp he objected to while it stood for more
than a year on public view. By contrast to Pinkerton's vicious and
loud slackness, Patrick Turner analyzed the circuit and made
suggestions which were incorporated, and John Byrns made another
important suggestion which we shall shortly discuss and then
incorporate because I have already tested it. From Pinkerton all this
while, zero. In short, Pinkerton's claim of my ignorance is a sham,
an excuse for him to indulge his malicious urge to bring pain to
everyone else, 4607 times in 15 months on a single newsgroup.

Andre Jute

Part of a series of articles:
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
1. BACKGROUND
2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
3. PINKERTON'S IGNORANCE OF THE BASICS
4. PINKERTON LIES ON PROFESSIONAL MATTERS FOR PERSONAL REASONS
5. CONCLUSION

Stewart Pinkerton writes to offer his own message count:
Click on the above links, use advanced search on author, restrict groups to rec.audio.tubes and dates from 1 October 2004 to current date, and you get the following results:
Andre Jute - 662
Stewart Pinkerton - 602

I'm happy to accept Pinkerton's count. But we should note that Jute was
presenting the major KISS project, and yet Pinkerton sent 90 per cent
as many posts as Jute did. This alone is indicative of Pinkerton
maliciously trying to take over Jute's project.

That Pinkerton waged a pointless flame war for its own sake is
indicated by Jute's summary: "As the result of Pinkerton's 602 posts,
not a single line of the booklength KISS materials was altered, not a
single fact was altered, not a single schematic was altered in the
slightest."

After 111 posts and 100 hours on public view, the revised count was the
only argument offered in this analysis of Pinkerton's malice. The other
facts stand unchallenged.

Andre Jute

But we should note that Jute was presenting the major KISS project,

Mr. McCoy:

As noted and as is becoming more and more clear as even your "Timmies"
and your various and sundry other acolytes appear to be abandoning you:

You write only for yourself. Drop the "we" crap. Lest you think
otherwise, I write only for myself as well...

And your "major " project just does also appear to happen to be a
loose system of fantasies supported by anecdotes of doubtful veracity.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

On 5 Mar 2006 17:45:32 -0800, " wrote:

But we should note that Jute was presenting the major KISS project,

Mr. McCoy:

As noted and as is becoming more and more clear as even your "Timmies"
and your various and sundry other acolytes appear to be abandoning you:

You write only for yourself. Drop the "we" crap. Lest you think
otherwise, I write only for myself as well...

And your "major " project just does also appear to happen to be a
loose system of fantasies supported by anecdotes of doubtful veracity.

Interesting how fast Jute dropped his claim of 4607 posts from me, and
accepted the true number of 602. Also interesting (and entirely
predictable) that he assumes that it's all about him - these were my
*total* posts to RAT over an 18 month period. An average of one post a
day, and included my own 'major KISASS project', which is every bit as
substantial as Jute's endless turgid prose surrounding a very simple
amplifier.

Shame that he can't apply the same KISS principle to the 'design'
articles, which could have been wrapped up in a couple of hundred
lines, rather than the endless thousands of lines of purple prose,
wild assertions and self-aggrandisement that he's taken to get halfway
through the exercise to date.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering