On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:33:22 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

In article . com,
"Andre Jute" wrote:

More than an hour after I posted the very specific complaint below,
Jenn posted to the thread " WHY ANDREW
JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR" this text: "What do you people have against
bassoons?" That is Jenn's eighth message to a thread calling me a liar.

Tell me, Jenn, are you extraordinarily insensitive even for a poster to
RAO, are you too thick to be a musician, never mind a conductor, or can
you make a case that I ever told less than the truth about bassoons or
any of the other subjects you raised under a headline calling me a
liar?

I certainly wish sincerely that you are able to say your server
delivered my post pointing out your lack of sensitivity after you sent
your last post in that thread. That would leave only your seven earlier
messages to explain.

WTF are you talking about? I've not even read with any care any
evidence that you're a liar. I have to enough to be concerned about
with people saying that I am deaf, stupid, a sockpuppet, lying, etc. as
well as putting words in my mouth, for simply stating what I hear. I
only read the thread when it got into issue about which I'm interested.

Geese!

Apologies Jenn, you have inadvertently encountered what must be the
most deranged psychopath to hit the audio newgroups since the late
unlamented Alan Derrida. He's just a bitter old man who lives in the
wilds of Ireland, crying into his Guinness over what might have been,
and haunting rec.audio.tubes with his loyal band of sockpuppets. Best
ignored, really.

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

In article ,
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:33:22 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

In article . com,
"Andre Jute" wrote:

More than an hour after I posted the very specific complaint below,
Jenn posted to the thread " WHY ANDREW
JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR" this text: "What do you people have against
bassoons?" That is Jenn's eighth message to a thread calling me a liar.

Tell me, Jenn, are you extraordinarily insensitive even for a poster to
RAO, are you too thick to be a musician, never mind a conductor, or can
you make a case that I ever told less than the truth about bassoons or
any of the other subjects you raised under a headline calling me a
liar?

I certainly wish sincerely that you are able to say your server
delivered my post pointing out your lack of sensitivity after you sent
your last post in that thread. That would leave only your seven earlier
messages to explain.

WTF are you talking about? I've not even read with any care any
evidence that you're a liar. I have to enough to be concerned about
with people saying that I am deaf, stupid, a sockpuppet, lying, etc. as
well as putting words in my mouth, for simply stating what I hear. I
only read the thread when it got into issue about which I'm interested.

Geese!

Apologies Jenn, you have inadvertently encountered what must be the
most deranged psychopath to hit the audio newgroups since the late
unlamented Alan Derrida. He's just a bitter old man who lives in the
wilds of Ireland, crying into his Guinness over what might have been,
and haunting rec.audio.tubes with his loyal band of sockpuppets. Best
ignored, really.

Yeah, thanks.

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:

He's just a bitter old man ...

Look who's talking! If irony killed. Etc.

Yes keith g, I know, you've binned and removed and trashed and stuffed
this crosspot too, to yet again, where the sun never shines.

Andre Jute wrote:


Yet on these three conferences we find a thread "WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY
IS A LIAR" with 128 message from 29 distinct contributors (1). The
thread is about liquor, CD players, and much else. There is a
contributor called Andre Jute well known to regulars on all three these
conferences. No effort was made anywhere in this thread to prove that
he is a liar.

André posted about cocktails on March 6th without comment on the title,
thus setting a precedent. No apologies necessary.

Furthermore, André started the thread by libelling Mr. Pinkerton, under the title
'WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE'.
It was perfectly reasonable for Mr. Pinkerton to change the thread title
when he posted evidence of André Jute's lies. The only problem is that nobody
has discussed 'WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR'. Is it nature or nurture?

--
Eiron

There's something scary about stupidity made coherent - Tom Stoppard.

"Eiron" wrote in message
...
Andre Jute wrote:


Yet on these three conferences we find a thread "WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY
IS A LIAR" with 128 message from 29 distinct contributors (1). The
thread is about liquor, CD players, and much else. There is a
contributor called Andre Jute well known to regulars on all three these
conferences. No effort was made anywhere in this thread to prove that
he is a liar.

André posted about cocktails on March 6th without comment on the title,
thus setting a precedent. No apologies necessary.

Furthermore, André started the thread by libelling Mr. Pinkerton, under
the title
'WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE'.
It was perfectly reasonable for Mr. Pinkerton to change the thread title
when he posted evidence of André Jute's lies. The only problem is that
nobody
has discussed 'WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR'. Is it nature or nurture?

--
Eiron

There's something scary about stupidity made coherent - Tom Stoppard.


Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

Audiophiles 1, Driveby Shooters 19

Eiron wrote:

Andre Jute wrote:


Yet on these three conferences we find a thread "WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY
IS A LIAR" with 128 message from 29 distinct contributors (1). The
thread is about liquor, CD players, and much else. There is a
contributor called Andre Jute well known to regulars on all three these
conferences. No effort was made anywhere in this thread to prove that
he is a liar.

André posted about cocktails on March 6th without comment on the title,
thus setting a precedent. No apologies necessary.

Furthermore, André started the thread by libelling Mr. Pinkerton, under the title
'WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE'.
It was perfectly reasonable for Mr. Pinkerton to change the thread title
when he posted evidence of André Jute's lies. The only problem is that nobody
has discussed 'WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR'. Is it nature or nurture?

--
Eiron

There's something scary about stupidity made coherent - Tom Stoppard.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:50:31 +0000, Eiron wrote:

Andre Jute wrote:


Yet on these three conferences we find a thread "WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY
IS A LIAR" with 128 message from 29 distinct contributors (1). The
thread is about liquor, CD players, and much else. There is a
contributor called Andre Jute well known to regulars on all three these
conferences. No effort was made anywhere in this thread to prove that
he is a liar.

André posted about cocktails on March 6th without comment on the title,
thus setting a precedent. No apologies necessary.

Furthermore, André started the thread by libelling Mr. Pinkerton, under the title
'WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE'.
It was perfectly reasonable for Mr. Pinkerton to change the thread title
when he posted evidence of André Jute's lies. The only problem is that nobody
has discussed 'WHY ANDREW JUTE MCCOY IS A LIAR'. Is it nature or nurture?

Thank you for recognising the true origin of all this whining and
crying from the deranged creature that is Andre Jute. Or is he? :-)

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering

From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: Andre Jute
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 11:52 am
Email: "Andre Jute"

Let's see who apologizes and who adds abuse to the nauseating
insensitivity and appallingly poor manners they have already displayed
for 10 days and 128 messages

Well, I also posted to the thread when it said that Pinkerton was
unreliable (started by you, it appears).

So if I apologize to you, I must then also apologize to Stewart. Since
he likes and eats haggis, I'm afraid that isn't possible. I've had
haggis and it's disgusting.

I would also point out that you, to be fair, should probably apologize
to Stewart for negatively dragging his name into a thread title, which
could also be called 'insensitive.' Goose, gander, and all.

So, even though I do not pay much attention to thread titles (like most
here, I'd imagine), since I have posted to both threads, and since I
will not apologize to a haggis-eater, I guess that means you'd better
put me in with the trailer park trash. TIA...:-)



Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

From: Keith G
Date: Tues, Mar 14 2006 7:11 pm
Email: "Keith G"

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

Too much crossposting - *Binned and removed*...

LOL! We can do this indefinitely...