
May 26th 06, 06:41 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
roke wrote:
I'm thinking of getting one of these power amps. Can find no reviews. Or
else I am looking at the Quad 405. Can anyone tell me what the Mark series
power amps are like? (I will be running it with SAE Mark IB pre-amp and Kef
Concerto speakers).
You have an aversion to anything modern by any chance ?
Graham
|

May 26th 06, 06:43 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
Serge Auckland wrote:
Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:
IME, the old SAE stuff is overrated. It has all the defects of that period.
It is much noisier than modern equipment.
My experience supports your statement. I had a 1980-ish vintage amp and
preamp that were noisy and very prone to failure (especially the amp).
On the other hand the QUAD 405 is rock-solid, totally dependable and
pretty much indestructible. If you can get one, the 405mkII is better as
it provides more current into difficult loads, but as I recall, the KEF
Concertos weren't that difficult to drive, so the 405 Mk1 should work fine.
Sadly every single time I've heard a Quad 405 they sounded utterly lifeless and
dull. No other amp of that era has acheived this. No idea why. Of course it
needn't have been the 405 at fault.
Graham
|

May 26th 06, 07:19 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
In article , Pooh Bear rabbitsfriendsandr
writes
Serge Auckland wrote:
Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Robert Morein" wrote:
IME, the old SAE stuff is overrated. It has all the defects of that period.
It is much noisier than modern equipment.
My experience supports your statement. I had a 1980-ish vintage amp and
preamp that were noisy and very prone to failure (especially the amp).
On the other hand the QUAD 405 is rock-solid, totally dependable and
pretty much indestructible. If you can get one, the 405mkII is better as
it provides more current into difficult loads, but as I recall, the KEF
Concertos weren't that difficult to drive, so the 405 Mk1 should work fine.
Sadly every single time I've heard a Quad 405 they sounded utterly lifeless and
dull. No other amp of that era has acheived this. No idea why. Of course it
needn't have been the 405 at fault.
Graham
Yep!, my Audiolab amps sound like that, dull and lifeless..
Mind you the ESL63's sound just the same
...dull and lifeless....
--
Tony Sayer
|

May 26th 06, 07:37 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
|

May 26th 06, 07:55 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
In article , Pooh Bear rabbitsfriendsand
writes
tony sayer wrote:
In article , Pooh Bear rabbitsfriendsandr
writes
Serge Auckland wrote:
On the other hand the QUAD 405 is rock-solid, totally dependable and
pretty much indestructible. If you can get one, the 405mkII is better as
it provides more current into difficult loads, but as I recall, the KEF
Concertos weren't that difficult to drive, so the 405 Mk1 should work fine.
Sadly every single time I've heard a Quad 405 they sounded utterly lifeless
and
dull. No other amp of that era has acheived this. No idea why. Of course it
needn't have been the 405 at fault.
Graham
Yep!, my Audiolab amps sound like that, dull and lifeless..
Mind you the ESL63's sound just the same
..dull and lifeless....
Have you heard the original ESLs ? Totally wonderful.
Yes..mine date from 1981
They do need occasional maintenance though, so you might have come across duds
that
had been neglected.
Yes..very aware;!...
Graham
--
Tony Sayer
|

May 26th 06, 08:08 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
Pooh Bear wrote:
Have you heard the original ESLs ? Totally wonderful.
They do need occasional maintenance though, so you might have come across duds that
had been neglected.
Not stricty true to call it maintenance. I would call it occasional rebuilding
to completely dismantle a speaker and replace the diaphragms.
--
Eiron
No good deed ever goes unpunished.
|

May 26th 06, 08:15 AM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
Eiron wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote:
Have you heard the original ESLs ? Totally wonderful.
They do need occasional maintenance though, so you might have come across duds that
had been neglected.
Not stricty true to call it maintenance. I would call it occasional rebuilding
to completely dismantle a speaker and replace the diaphragms.
Just trying to remember. Can't they just be re-tensioned ?
Foam surround speakers need their suspensions renewing from time to time too.
Graham
|

May 26th 06, 02:04 PM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
roke wrote:
I'm thinking of getting one of these power amps. Can find no reviews. Or
else I am looking at the Quad 405. Can anyone tell me what the Mark
series
power amps are like? (I will be running it with SAE Mark IB pre-amp and
Kef
Concerto speakers).
You have an aversion to anything modern by any chance ?
Graham
Not particularly. Just trying to upgrade within a certain budget. So, I
decided to keep the concertos, re-cap them, and re-build into a more modern,
tall, cabinet (stumbled across a good german design). For ~150euro don't
think I can do much better with regard speakers.
Then, throwing out my Yamaha CR640 integrated amp. Found the SAE IB for a
great price by accident. Works perfect. Now looking for a power amp for
~150euro. Reckon I can get more bang for the buck with vintage gear, and
would probably match my KEFs better. So I was looking at the SAE Mark gear,
405, and I have my eye on something else which has come up which I won't
mention at this time in case of competition!!
See how it goes..
Ro
|

May 26th 06, 02:12 PM
posted to alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio
|
|
Anyone familiar with SAE Mark series?
"roke" wrote in message
...
"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
roke wrote:
I'm thinking of getting one of these power amps. Can find no reviews. Or
else I am looking at the Quad 405. Can anyone tell me what the Mark
series
power amps are like? (I will be running it with SAE Mark IB pre-amp and
Kef
Concerto speakers).
You have an aversion to anything modern by any chance ?
Graham
Not particularly. Just trying to upgrade within a certain budget. So, I
decided to keep the concertos, re-cap them, and re-build into a more
modern, tall, cabinet (stumbled across a good german design). For ~150euro
don't think I can do much better with regard speakers.
Then, throwing out my Yamaha CR640 integrated amp. Found the SAE IB for a
great price by accident. Works perfect. Now looking for a power amp for
~150euro. Reckon I can get more bang for the buck with vintage gear, and
would probably match my KEFs better. So I was looking at the SAE Mark
gear, 405, and I have my eye on something else which has come up which I
won't mention at this time in case of competition!!
See how it goes..
Ro
Also thought the Quad 405 faciliated a good upgrade route... because you can
easily get the Quad 405 upgraded... lots of kits out there...
Then, next amp after the 405 will probably be good Valve monoblocks. But I
don't want to go down the road of having to mess around with and tweak what
I would be able to buy for 100euro a block. Will wait till I can throw a lot
more cash at it. Also, I want a bit more power.
Ro
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|