Arny Krueger wrote:
"paul packer" wrote in message

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:33:55 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:59:33 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On 6 Jul 2006 05:01:18 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:

Krueger can be viewed -- and no
doubt will view himself in the clarity of the moment
before death -- as an overly fanatical pusher of the
narrowest knife-edge of science misapplied.

Hmmm...that's optimistic. And what good will it do us?

It shows that you as a group have raised your level of
self-deception. Good job! ;-)

I doubt you even know what Andre actually said.

So now you have concerns over the accuracy of your quote
of Andre?

No. Only of your sanity.

Talking about sanity, Paul? I guess you think your name is Andre.

Psychology doesn't enter into it, though I doubt that what I actually
said holds much comfort for either of you squabling children. Context
is all:
----------------
As a matter of perspective George -- and much as I hate to say a
single kind word about an immoral slimeball like Krueger -- there is a
difference between Krueger and Rochlin. Krueger can be viewed -- and no

doubt will view himself in the clarity of the moment before death -- as

an overly fanatical pusher of the narrowest knife-edge of science
misapplied. It is not an uncommon thing for cranks to do, though most
of them are not as vicious as Krueger.

Rochlin of the Enjoythemusic.com ripoff doesn't even have the excuse of

a strong conviction, unless it is the strong conviction that the rest
of us exist only as a trough for Rochlin to dip his snout into at
feeding time, which for Rochlin is all the time. Rochlin's basic
immorality is greed, then more greed, then ignorance of what a proper
review sheet does, then some more greed, then the dishonesty of giving
manufacturers the reviews they pay for. Krueger was just badly brought
up and poorly educated but Rochlin is mercenary trash. I leave it to
you
decide which is worse.

Andre Jute
Habit is the nursery of errors. -- Victor Hugo
----------------

As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse for being stupid
or, for that matter, greedy.

On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute" wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse for being stupid
or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

paul packer wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute" wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse for being stupid
or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Mr. McCoy has always been able to write massive amounts of drivel in
order to mean nothing. Those who do not know it an read its excretions
figure that with all that going on there must be a pony in there
somewhere... typically there is not.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

"paul packer" wrote in message

On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse for
being stupid or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Sorry to talk over your head, Paul. I just don't do well at writing at the
third grade level.

wrote in message
oups.com
paul packer wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse
for being stupid or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Mr. McCoy has always been able to write massive amounts
of drivel in order to mean nothing. Those who do not know
it an read its excretions figure that with all that going
on there must be a pony in there somewhere... typically
there is not.

It appears that Packer aspires to the same excretory standard.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"paul packer" wrote in message

On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse for
being stupid or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Sorry to talk over your head, Paul. I just don't do well at writing at the
third grade level.



No, you don't....

.......it's more, like, uh, I mean, *Valley Girl*.......

Like, *totally*, uh like, *far out*...

Like, f'sure, f'sure.....

*Totally*....

Keith G wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"paul packer" wrote in message

On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse for
being stupid or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Sorry to talk over your head, Paul. I just don't do well at writing at the
third grade level.



No, you don't....

......it's more, like, uh, I mean, *Valley Girl*.......

Like, *totally*, uh like, *far out*...

Like, f'sure, f'sure.....

*Totally*....

You got no street cred, Keith. I can see instantly that you are
British, middle-aged, middle-class, propertly educated (literate if not
necessarily numerate), and think before you speak.

How do I know all this? Well, for a start I'm a smartass. But, achurly,
nobody can miss the hugest giveaway tip of them all: you left out
"orrsum".

FIY, the Valley girls won't let Krueger into the club. You gotta have
lots of hair and an IQ over 70; Krueger doesn't qualify on either
count.

Andre Jute
Lexicographer (in Valleyspeak: a word 'tec)

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com
Keith G wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"paul packer" wrote in message

On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse
for being stupid or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Sorry to talk over your head, Paul. I just don't do
well at writing at the third grade level.



No, you don't....

......it's more, like, uh, I mean, *Valley Girl*.......

Like, *totally*, uh like, *far out*...

Like, f'sure, f'sure.....

*Totally*....

You got no street cred, Keith. I can see instantly that
you are British, middle-aged, middle-class, propertly
educated (literate if not necessarily numerate), and
think before you speak.

Well Andre, you forgot the "techically illiterate" and "bull headed" part of
any complete description of Keith.

But you can't see those in yourself even though they are massive! Therefore,
you're excused.

How do I know all this? Well, for a start I'm a smartass.

You forgot the dumass part, Andre.

But, achurly, nobody can miss the hugest giveaway tip of
them all: you left out "orrsum".

Inablity to properly spell a common slang word, noted.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=orsome


FIY, the Valley girls won't let Krueger into the club.
You gotta have lots of hair and an IQ under 70; Krueger
doesn't qualify on either count.

Agreed.

Andre Jute
Lexicographer (in Valleyspeak: a word 'tec)

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com...

Keith G wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"paul packer" wrote in message

On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse for
being stupid or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Sorry to talk over your head, Paul. I just don't do well at writing at
the
third grade level.



No, you don't....

......it's more, like, uh, I mean, *Valley Girl*.......

Like, *totally*, uh like, *far out*...

Like, f'sure, f'sure.....

*Totally*....

You got no street cred, Keith. I can see instantly that you are
British, middle-aged, middle-class, propertly educated (literate if not
necessarily numerate), and think before you speak.


Right on the money - even down to the no particular numeracy skills,
although if I said the answer was *1.414* I doubt many here would know what
the question was....???



How do I know all this? Well, for a start I'm a smartass. But, achurly,
nobody can miss the hugest giveaway tip of them all: you left out
"orrsum".

FIY, the Valley girls won't let Krueger into the club. You gotta have
lots of hair and an IQ over 70; Krueger doesn't qualify on either
count.


I'm saying nothing, I've just polished a fingertip and thumb unthinkingly
pulling on a connector (to test it) that I had *only just* just soldered to
a speaker wire....

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com
Keith G wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"paul packer" wrote in message

On 12 Jul 2006 18:52:23 -0700, "Andre Jute"
wrote:


As you can see, I don't accept insanity as an excuse
for being stupid or, for that matter, greedy.

Do you accept it as an excuse for being infuriatingly
incomprehensible? If so Arnie may be off the hook.

Sorry to talk over your head, Paul. I just don't do
well at writing at the third grade level.



No, you don't....

......it's more, like, uh, I mean, *Valley Girl*.......

Like, *totally*, uh like, *far out*...

Like, f'sure, f'sure.....

*Totally*....

You got no street cred, Keith. I can see instantly that
you are British, middle-aged, middle-class, propertly
educated (literate if not necessarily numerate), and
think before you speak.

Well Andre, you forgot the "techically illiterate" and "bull headed" part
of any complete description of Keith.


:-)

Fortunately, one pretty much compensates for the other - now you'll have to
excuse me, I want to get me new speakers finalised and back online for the
weekend....