![]() |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:27:51 +0100, Eeyore
wrote: Don Pearce wrote: "Bret Ludwig" wrote: Trevor Wilson wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message Eeyore wrote: Have you ever spent any time listening to a true Class A solid state amplifiers ? Yes. A mate drove his ESLs with a Sugden. One of the cleanest sounding systems I've ever heard. Wouldn't shake the windows, though. ;-) **Sugdens have never built pure Class A amps (whatever that means). They have only ever built high bias Class A/B designs. And, of course, Class A is only Class A when specified into a particular load impedance. Usually 8 Ohms. Given the fact that ESLs vary all over the map, impedance-wise, suggesting that the amp is Class A is even less likely. This is actually true. High bias AB amps operate in class A through most of the power range they spend all their time in, giving the advantage of Calss A operation where it is needed, and rather than running out of power when this is exceeded they simply transition into Class B. So-called experts, and their toadies and asskissers (such as Jeboo-selling Randy Slone) have pounded on the idea that Class AB is a poor design methodology because of "transconductance doubling". Obviously this is nonexistant in the region of Class A operation. Do you mean nonexistent in the region of class B operation? It is class A that provides the transconductance doubling because there are two active devices operating in parallel. I'm concerned about the transconductance 'modulation' with signal level since this introduces non-linearity. Graham That would be greatest in the transition region between class A and class B. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
Don Pearce wrote: Eeyore wrote: Don Pearce wrote: "Bret Ludwig" wrote: Trevor Wilson wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message Eeyore wrote: Have you ever spent any time listening to a true Class A solid state amplifiers ? Yes. A mate drove his ESLs with a Sugden. One of the cleanest sounding systems I've ever heard. Wouldn't shake the windows, though. ;-) **Sugdens have never built pure Class A amps (whatever that means). They have only ever built high bias Class A/B designs. And, of course, Class A is only Class A when specified into a particular load impedance. Usually 8 Ohms. Given the fact that ESLs vary all over the map, impedance-wise, suggesting that the amp is Class A is even less likely. This is actually true. High bias AB amps operate in class A through most of the power range they spend all their time in, giving the advantage of Calss A operation where it is needed, and rather than running out of power when this is exceeded they simply transition into Class B. So-called experts, and their toadies and asskissers (such as Jeboo-selling Randy Slone) have pounded on the idea that Class AB is a poor design methodology because of "transconductance doubling". Obviously this is nonexistant in the region of Class A operation. Do you mean nonexistent in the region of class B operation? It is class A that provides the transconductance doubling because there are two active devices operating in parallel. I'm concerned about the transconductance 'modulation' with signal level since this introduces non-linearity. Graham That would be greatest in the transition region between class A and class B. Exactly spot-on Don and readily visible when looking at a distortion analyser's output. This is why Trevor's ideas baffle me. My intention is to entirely eliminate this with a kind of 'hybrid' output stage. Graham |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
Eeyore wrote:
Geoff wrote: Eeyore wrote: Have you ever spent any time listening to a true Class A solid state amplifiers ? Any comments on how it sounded compared to any other types ? Hotter ? I can't remember the models - it was a while ago. Only audible difference to me was that the AB one sounded harsher when louder. Not too surprising. But the Class A ampcouldn't actually get that loud anyway, so not fair comparison I guess. Did you notice any differences at lower levels ? Subtle, and not that couldn't be explained by pyschological factors. Not blind, let alone 'double'. geoff |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
"Eeyore" ** Transistor car radios made in the 1960s were class A. They had a 2N301 or similar TO3 pack Germanium PNP power transistor for output, fed with 12 volts via an iron cored choke. The speaker connected directly across the choke - it made a small click when you did. It *could* have been capacitively coupled had it been a problem of course. I just discovered in r.a.t that this has been done for SET outputs. I had something more modern in mind though. ** No reason why SET cannot refer to Single Ended Transistor - is there ?? The choke protects the speaker from DC and you can still use oodles of NFB. ........ Phil |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
Phil Allison wrote: "Eeyore" ** Transistor car radios made in the 1960s were class A. They had a 2N301 or similar TO3 pack Germanium PNP power transistor for output, fed with 12 volts via an iron cored choke. The speaker connected directly across the choke - it made a small click when you did. It *could* have been capacitively coupled had it been a problem of course. I just discovered in r.a.t that this has been done for SET outputs. I had something more modern in mind though. ** No reason why SET cannot refer to Single Ended Transistor - is there ?? LOL ! Since you mention it ! Well spotted Sir. The choke protects the speaker from DC and you can still use oodles of NFB. My current ruse is to avoid *any* global NFB. Not because it's important but for pure marketing bull**** factor. Graham |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
In article ,
Trevor Wilson wrote: Yes. A mate drove his ESLs with a Sugden. One of the cleanest sounding systems I've ever heard. Wouldn't shake the windows, though. ;-) **Sugdens have never built pure Class A amps (whatever that means). Well there you go. If you don't know what it means, you can't define it. They have only ever built high bias Class A/B designs. And, of course, Class A is only Class A when specified into a particular load impedance. Usually 8 Ohms. Given the fact that ESLs vary all over the map, impedance-wise, suggesting that the amp is Class A is even less likely. In the terms of the question and accepted meaning it was a Class A amp. -- *I took an IQ test and the results were negative. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
In article m, Mike
Rivers writes Eeyore wrote: Have you ever spent any time listening to a true Class A solid state amplifiers ? Any comments on how it sounded compared to any other types ? Amplifiers are amplifiers. Some sound better than others. There's nothing magic about a Class A amplifier, but it sure sounds good on the marketing literature. Most people have the good sense to not use a Class C amplifier for high quality audio. Anyone ever made a good commercially viable class D amp?... -- Tony Sayer |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
Eeyore wrote:
Have you ever spent any time listening to a true Class A solid state amplifiers ? Any comments on how it sounded compared to any other types ? I designed one for driving a special load, where I already had awkward phase shifts in an external feedback system and didn't want anything unpredictable happening inside the amplifier at frequencies outside the normal design range. I can't really help you much with how it sounded, because it drove a cutterhead for recording wax cylinders and there were quality issues in the reproducing equipment that completely swamped any subtleties of the recording chain! -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
"tony sayer" Anyone ever made a good commercially viable class D amp?... ** Crown did that is 1996. Their K1 and K2 models are class D - both still current. ......... Phil |
Experiences of Class A solid-state ?
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Trevor Wilson wrote: Yes. A mate drove his ESLs with a Sugden. One of the cleanest sounding systems I've ever heard. Wouldn't shake the windows, though. ;-) **Sugdens have never built pure Class A amps (whatever that means). Well there you go. If you don't know what it means, you can't define it. **_I_ can define it, but manufacturers usually stretch theirs. Point is, it depends on the load impedance. They have only ever built high bias Class A/B designs. And, of course, Class A is only Class A when specified into a particular load impedance. Usually 8 Ohms. Given the fact that ESLs vary all over the map, impedance-wise, suggesting that the amp is Class A is even less likely. In the terms of the question and accepted meaning it was a Class A amp. **Nope. They only built high bias Class A/B amps. The first Sugden I ever saw was about 40 Watts/channel. It ran bloody hot and people all said it was Class A. I didn't believe it, so I tested one at 5 Watts Class A. Substantial, but not Class A. About 100 times more Class A than most amps of the time. It was still Class A/B though. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk