![]() |
|
Hidden features Cambridge Audio DVD89
"TT" wrote in message ... "Alan Rutlidge" wrote in message ... : : I can back up TT''s claim. The Cambridge Azur 640H is indeed a HOS. : I have to applaud TT's persistence with the darn thing. If it was mine it : would be an expensive (very small) boat anchor by now. : : Cheers, : Alan : : Mmmmmmm........me thinks you shall remind me of this erroneous purchase for many years to come ;-) Cheers TT Nah. Made quite a few mistakes myself over the years. Some worse than others. :-( I seriously doubt if anyone can hold you personally responsible for Cambridge Audio's crap gear. Mind you, credit is due where credit is due for your persistence in trying to get the bloody thing to work reliably. Personally, I would have hurled it into the canal by now or used it for crab bait. But then again I'm not known for my patience. :P Cheers, Alan |
Hidden features Cambridge Audio DVD89
"Alan Rutlidge" schreef in bericht ... "TT" wrote in message ... "Alan Rutlidge" wrote in message ... : : I can back up TT''s claim. The Cambridge Azur 640H is indeed a HOS. : I have to applaud TT's persistence with the darn thing. If it was mine it : would be an expensive (very small) boat anchor by now. : : Cheers, : Alan : : Mmmmmmm........me thinks you shall remind me of this erroneous purchase for many years to come ;-) Cheers TT Nah. Made quite a few mistakes myself over the years. Some worse than others. :-( I seriously doubt if anyone can hold you personally responsible for Cambridge Audio's crap gear. Mind you, credit is due where credit is due for your persistence in trying to get the bloody thing to work reliably. Personally, I would have hurled it into the canal by now or used it for crab bait. But then again I'm not known for my patience. :P Cheers, Alan What about getting professional help ... it might help ... really ! |
Hidden features Cambridge Audio DVD89
"Max Headroom" wrote in message ... "Alan Rutlidge" schreef in bericht ... "TT" wrote in message ... "Alan Rutlidge" wrote in message ... : : I can back up TT''s claim. The Cambridge Azur 640H is indeed a HOS. : I have to applaud TT's persistence with the darn thing. If it was mine it : would be an expensive (very small) boat anchor by now. : : Cheers, : Alan : : Mmmmmmm........me thinks you shall remind me of this erroneous purchase for many years to come ;-) Cheers TT Nah. Made quite a few mistakes myself over the years. Some worse than others. :-( I seriously doubt if anyone can hold you personally responsible for Cambridge Audio's crap gear. Mind you, credit is due where credit is due for your persistence in trying to get the bloody thing to work reliably. Personally, I would have hurled it into the canal by now or used it for crab bait. But then again I'm not known for my patience. :P Cheers, Alan What about getting professional help ... it might help ... really ! AFAIK TT spent hours trying to get assistance from Cambridge Audio's technical support. Eventually they wouldn't respond to any communiqués whatsoever. The day saved only by the fact the dealer agreed to take it back and refund TT's money which is more than CA ever did. As for your earlier post that they must have concentrated on the audio section at the expense of the software you're wrong. Not only did it perform poorly from an operational perspective it sounded rather mediocre IMHO. :-( I'm sure TT is glad to be rid of the POS. Cheers, Alan |
Hidden features Cambridge Audio DVD89
max graff wrote:
Seriously, MP3 is a sacrilage to sound quality at least for old timers like me who have grown up on vinyl and recently embrassed CD audio. Actually MP3 can sound pretty good, *if*... You use a decent encoder (eg LAME). You keep the bitrate high enough, over 192Kbit or better still VBR. You use j-stereo wherever possible (avoids ringing artefacts in the surround channels if you squirt it through a Pro-Logic decoder). You use decent hardware to play it back on. I personally encode using LAME with options "-mj -b32 -V0 -q1". You're hard pushed to tell the difference even in a back-to-back comparison. As for the hardware... most PC sound cards are appalling. But an MP3 played on my iPod through the dock will sound better than the same track played from the original CD from my old Technics player (SL-PG590). Burn a CD-R full of MP3s and lob it in the DVD player (Arcam DV-79) and you'll be hard pushed to tell the difference. Or use something like a Slim Squeezebox, Turtle Beach Audiotron etc with the digital output going straight into the AV receiver (Arcam AVR-250) and again you'll be hard pushed to tell the difference. -- Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735 Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk