A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old March 9th 07, 03:17 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way


"Serge Auckland" wrote


Just what we need!

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Gramophone-Rec...QQcmdZViewItem

S.



Streuth!

OK, that puts it into perspective for me - thank gawd I never got into it,
it could drive you nuts!

(Just listing that many of them indicates how much of an obsession it
could/would become!! :-)


  #12 (permalink)  
Old March 13th 07, 09:28 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
RdM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way

"Serge Auckland" wrote in
om:

As to buying 78s, the real problem is that as they aren't making
any more, *all* 78s are now 50 years old or more, and have had an uncertain
life. Even much later electric pickups were still groove-grinders. Buying
off Ebay won't be any more secure than car boot sales or the local dump. I
would also like to try a 78 stylus on my TTs, but, frankly, I have better
things to spend money on when all 78s I'm likely to play will be of
uncertain origins.


All true, although there may be a very few little played ones out there ...
Decades ago I picked up a boxed set of Albert Schweitzer playing Bach organ,
in seemingly quite good condition; I gave them away in exchange for a weeks
exceptional hospitality when I noticed that the host had a gramophone...

But apparently almost all of Schweitzer's 78 RPM recordings of Bach organ
works have been reissued on CD now anyway ...

Here's a curiosity though, not mine; purportedly a *vinyl* 78rpm, perhaps an
experimental step up from 12" 45's? Whatever, the punters are bidding it up!
(Reminds me of Dave Plowmans sig "A fool and his money are soon partying")
--
Elvis Presley unusual vinyl 78prm New Zealand pres
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/List...px?id=90884320
Current bid: $111.00 | Reserve met | Closes: 23 hours

"Elvis Presley unusual vinyl 78prm New Zealand pressing
Good condition. Rare vinyl 78prm New Zealand pressing RCA NZ No 20-6643 Cat No
G2WB-4767 Love me tender / Anyway you want me Cat No G2WB-5937
Cover as you will see in photos is in used condition. Great collectable!"
--
RdM
Auckland, NZ
  #13 (permalink)  
Old March 13th 07, 09:38 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 104
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way


"RdM" wrote in message
...
"Serge Auckland" wrote in
om:

As to buying 78s, the real problem is that as they aren't making
any more, *all* 78s are now 50 years old or more, and have had an
uncertain
life. Even much later electric pickups were still groove-grinders.
Buying
off Ebay won't be any more secure than car boot sales or the local dump.
I
would also like to try a 78 stylus on my TTs, but, frankly, I have better
things to spend money on when all 78s I'm likely to play will be of
uncertain origins.


All true, although there may be a very few little played ones out there
...
Decades ago I picked up a boxed set of Albert Schweitzer playing Bach
organ,
in seemingly quite good condition; I gave them away in exchange for a
weeks
exceptional hospitality when I noticed that the host had a gramophone...

But apparently almost all of Schweitzer's 78 RPM recordings of Bach organ
works have been reissued on CD now anyway ...

Here's a curiosity though, not mine; purportedly a *vinyl* 78rpm, perhaps
an
experimental step up from 12" 45's? Whatever, the punters are bidding it
up!
(Reminds me of Dave Plowmans sig "A fool and his money are soon partying")
--
Elvis Presley unusual vinyl 78prm New Zealand pres
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/List...px?id=90884320
Current bid: $111.00 | Reserve met | Closes: 23 hours

"Elvis Presley unusual vinyl 78prm New Zealand pressing
Good condition. Rare vinyl 78prm New Zealand pressing RCA NZ No 20-6643
Cat No
G2WB-4767 Love me tender / Anyway you want me Cat No G2WB-5937
Cover as you will see in photos is in used condition. Great collectable!"
--
RdM
Auckland, NZ


I would have thought that a vinyl 78 would wear very quickly, as being far
too soft for tracking weights measured in ounces, not grams.

S.


  #14 (permalink)  
Old March 13th 07, 10:20 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
RdM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way

"Serge Auckland" in
om:

"RdM" wrote in message
...
"Serge Auckland" wrote in
om:

As to buying 78s, the real problem is that as they aren't making
any more, *all* 78s are now 50 years old or more, and have had an
uncertain
life. Even much later electric pickups were still groove-grinders.
Buying
off Ebay won't be any more secure than car boot sales or the local dump.
I
would also like to try a 78 stylus on my TTs, but, frankly, I have better
things to spend money on when all 78s I'm likely to play will be of
uncertain origins.


All true, although there may be a very few little played ones out there
...
Decades ago I picked up a boxed set of Albert Schweitzer playing Bach
organ,
in seemingly quite good condition; I gave them away in exchange for a
weeks
exceptional hospitality when I noticed that the host had a gramophone...

But apparently almost all of Schweitzer's 78 RPM recordings of Bach organ
works have been reissued on CD now anyway ...

Here's a curiosity though, not mine; purportedly a *vinyl* 78rpm, perhaps
an
experimental step up from 12" 45's? Whatever, the punters are bidding it
up!
(Reminds me of Dave Plowmans sig "A fool and his money are soon partying")
--
Elvis Presley unusual vinyl 78prm New Zealand pres
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/List...px?id=90884320
Current bid: $111.00 | Reserve met | Closes: 23 hours

"Elvis Presley unusual vinyl 78prm New Zealand pressing
Good condition. Rare vinyl 78prm New Zealand pressing RCA NZ No 20-6643
Cat No
G2WB-4767 Love me tender / Anyway you want me Cat No G2WB-5937
Cover as you will see in photos is in used condition. Great collectable!"
--
RdM
Auckland, NZ


I would have thought that a vinyl 78 would wear very quickly, as being far
too soft for tracking weights measured in ounces, not grams.

S.


I'd assume that if it is a 78 vinyl, it's designed for decks of the day that
still have a 78 speed setting, but perhaps still using a normal MM pickup?

Just recently I bought (quite cheap) an odd thick white vinyl, 45rpm 12", 1976
by Crystal Clear Records, Inc, called "San Fransisco Ltd"; some live jazz
recorded with "Direct to Disc Recording"; not utilizing tape, but recorded
directly to the master lacquer; it says ""mixed live", in real time, with no
opportunity to stop the performance or to go back and "fix" mistakes".

The blurb invites one to "Listen carefully, at high volume levels, to the
innermost grooves. There is virtually no pinch distortion thus yielding
substantial improvement in high frequency response."

I must say it is in very good condition, and indeed quite the liveliest and
clear sounding LP I have heard for some time, incl some other 12" 45's.

Hence my wondering whether the auction was of a similiar experiment in high
speed recording; I have never otherwise heard of a "vinyl" 78rpm, which I
would assume would be using microgrooves and not designed for standard 78
needles. Surely Elvis was too late to be issued on standard 78 acetates!? -
IOW, I assume one can take the sellers description of vinyl at face value.

Thanks,
RdM
  #15 (permalink)  
Old March 13th 07, 11:10 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Ian Iveson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way

RdM wrote

Hence my wondering whether the auction was of a similiar experiment
in high
speed recording; I have never otherwise heard of a "vinyl" 78rpm,
which I
would assume would be using microgrooves and not designed for
standard 78
needles. Surely Elvis was too late to be issued on standard 78
acetates!? -
IOW, I assume one can take the sellers description of vinyl at face
value.


Hi Ross

From Wikepedia:

"In the mid-40's, special DJ copies of records started being made of
vinyl also, for the same reason. These were all 78 RPM. During and
after World War II when shellac supplies were extremely limited, some
78 rpm records were pressed in vinyl instead of shellac (wax),
particularly the six-minute 12" (30 cm) 78 rpm records produced by
V-Disc for distribution to US troops in World War II. In the 40's,
radio transcriptions, which were usually on 16 inch records, but
sometimes 12 inch, were always made of vinyl, on 78 RPM."

cheers, Ian


  #16 (permalink)  
Old March 14th 07, 10:24 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Ross Matheson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way

"Ian Iveson" writes in
onder.co.uk:
RdM wrote

Hence my wondering whether the auction was of a similiar experiment
in high
speed recording; I have never otherwise heard of a "vinyl" 78rpm,


snip

Hi Ross

From Wikepedia:

"In the mid-40's, special DJ copies of records started being made of
vinyl also, for the same reason. These were all 78 RPM. During and
after World War II when shellac supplies were extremely limited, some
78 rpm records were pressed in vinyl instead of shellac (wax),
particularly the six-minute 12" (30 cm) 78 rpm records produced by
V-Disc for distribution to US troops in World War II. In the 40's,
radio transcriptions, which were usually on 16 inch records, but
sometimes 12 inch, were always made of vinyl, on 78 RPM."


Yikes! I often - usually - do a search but it didn't occur to me to just type
"vinyl 78rpm" into Google this time. I see I was thinking of old films when I
typed "acetate" too, although I'm doubtful about the "wax" after shellac.
Perhaps the author was thinking of the original wax masters.

In any case, it would appear that the vinyl 78's were designed to be played
back with a "normal" cartridge sporting a 78 stylus; there are cartridges
that will accept both LP & 78 styli, albeit at a higher tracking force for 78.

A little further down the results page shows www.historicmasters.org
re-pressing 78's onto vinyl from the original metal masters - at a price!

cheers, Ian


Regards;- Ross


  #17 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 07, 11:50 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way

"Ross Matheson" wrote in message
...

In any case, it would appear that the vinyl 78's were designed to be
played
back with a "normal" cartridge sporting a 78 stylus; there are cartridges
that will accept both LP & 78 styli, albeit at a higher tracking force for
78.


In most ordinary record players, cartridges used to be "turnover" for many
years after the introduction of fine groove records. The cantilever had two
styli and you turned a small knob on the front to change between fine and
coarse groove. I don't remember anyone changing the playing weight though,
it was probably about 5 g for everything.
--
Tony W
My e-mail address has no hyphen
- but please don't use it, reply to the group.


  #18 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 07, 11:55 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 104
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way


"Tony" wrote in message
k...
"Ross Matheson" wrote in message
...

In any case, it would appear that the vinyl 78's were designed to be
played
back with a "normal" cartridge sporting a 78 stylus; there are cartridges
that will accept both LP & 78 styli, albeit at a higher tracking force
for 78.


In most ordinary record players, cartridges used to be "turnover" for many
years after the introduction of fine groove records. The cantilever had
two styli and you turned a small knob on the front to change between fine
and coarse groove. I don't remember anyone changing the playing weight
though, it was probably about 5 g for everything.
--
Tony W
My e-mail address has no hyphen
- but please don't use it, reply to the group.

That's right, and in most cases, the microgroove stylus was diamond and the
coarse groove stylus was sapphire. As this one would wear very quickly, so
anyone who still regularly played 78s, would probably be playing them on a
worn stylus and so cause a lot of damage to the record. One further reason
why there are so few unworn 78s available now.

S.


  #19 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 07, 12:20 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Keith G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,388
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way


"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
...

"Tony" wrote in message
k...
"Ross Matheson" wrote in message
...

In any case, it would appear that the vinyl 78's were designed to be
played
back with a "normal" cartridge sporting a 78 stylus; there are
cartridges
that will accept both LP & 78 styli, albeit at a higher tracking force
for 78.


In most ordinary record players, cartridges used to be "turnover" for
many years after the introduction of fine groove records. The cantilever
had two styli and you turned a small knob on the front to change between
fine and coarse groove. I don't remember anyone changing the playing
weight though, it was probably about 5 g for everything.
--
Tony W
My e-mail address has no hyphen
- but please don't use it, reply to the group.

That's right, and in most cases, the microgroove stylus was diamond and
the coarse groove stylus was sapphire. As this one would wear very
quickly, so anyone who still regularly played 78s, would probably be
playing them on a worn stylus and so cause a lot of damage to the record.
One further reason why there are so few unworn 78s available now.



No-one more pleased to see *vinyl* back on the menu in here than me, but
even I'm getting concerned at how deep it seems to be going! That said,
here's another link to show just how *involving* the old stuff was and quite
obviously still is for a number of people:

http://www.gracyk.com/tenquestion.shtml


Scroll down to see the mention of bamboo and thorn needles, as well as the
detail instructions on how to operate the 'Fibre Needle Cutter'!! :-)

I love the 'How do I gain access to the spring motor?' question - how long
before we see that sort of thing in this group, the way things are going??

:-)







  #20 (permalink)  
Old March 15th 07, 12:50 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Serge Auckland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 104
Default Acoustic Gramophone, or, haven't we come a long way


"Keith G" wrote in message
news

"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
...

"Tony" wrote in message
k...
"Ross Matheson" wrote in message
...

In any case, it would appear that the vinyl 78's were designed to be
played
back with a "normal" cartridge sporting a 78 stylus; there are
cartridges
that will accept both LP & 78 styli, albeit at a higher tracking force
for 78.

In most ordinary record players, cartridges used to be "turnover" for
many years after the introduction of fine groove records. The
cantilever had two styli and you turned a small knob on the front to
change between fine and coarse groove. I don't remember anyone changing
the playing weight though, it was probably about 5 g for everything.
--
Tony W
My e-mail address has no hyphen
- but please don't use it, reply to the group.

That's right, and in most cases, the microgroove stylus was diamond and
the coarse groove stylus was sapphire. As this one would wear very
quickly, so anyone who still regularly played 78s, would probably be
playing them on a worn stylus and so cause a lot of damage to the record.
One further reason why there are so few unworn 78s available now.



No-one more pleased to see *vinyl* back on the menu in here than me, but
even I'm getting concerned at how deep it seems to be going! That said,
here's another link to show just how *involving* the old stuff was and
quite obviously still is for a number of people:

http://www.gracyk.com/tenquestion.shtml


Scroll down to see the mention of bamboo and thorn needles, as well as the
detail instructions on how to operate the 'Fibre Needle Cutter'!! :-)

I love the 'How do I gain access to the spring motor?' question - how long
before we see that sort of thing in this group, the way things are going??

:-)

I'm watching this one:-

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...0589&rd=1&rd=1

I might have bid if they did a Van den Hul version.....

S.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.