i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

From the desk of
Andre Jute, Capo di Capo Tuti
Internet Guru Issuing Council
In the seventh year after the Magnequest Scum ran way

To
Pompass Plodnick
aka Henry Pasternack
Place de la Place Secure Institute for the Incorrigible

Dear Plod

i-Geek (sponsored by Apple Corporation) has again reviewed your
application to the sinecure of Guru on RAT. In view of your deplorable
record, including repeatedly lying on professional matters,
allegations about children, your malicious persecution of individuals
who refuse to respect the Stanford degree you brag about, and your
association with the antisocial Magnequest Scum, it was an easy
decision for the Junior Appointments Commission of i-Geek to place you
at the bottom of the list. Frankly, you will never rise higher. You
will probably be happier on some moderated group where those who doubt
your obiter dicta can be excluded by the moderators.

Without the slightest regret,

Andre Jute
Prime Geek

PS
We're looking for a new i-Geek motto. As a consolation prize we will
let you enter the competition to create a new motto with this line:
"You don't need global feedback to build a good-sounding amplifier."
-- Henry Pasternack

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

in article , Andre Jute
at wrote on 5/7/07 6:56 PM:

From the desk of
Andre Jute, Capo di Capo Tuti
Internet Guru Issuing Council
In the seventh year after the Magnequest Scum ran way

To
Pompass Plodnick
aka Henry Pasternack
Place de la Place Secure Institute for the Incorrigible

Dear Plod

i-Geek (sponsored by Apple Corporation) has again reviewed your
application to the sinecure of Guru on RAT. In view of your deplorable
record, including repeatedly lying on professional matters,
allegations about children, your malicious persecution of individuals
who refuse to respect the Stanford degree you brag about, and your
association with the antisocial Magnequest Scum, it was an easy
decision for the Junior Appointments Commission of i-Geek to place you
at the bottom of the list. Frankly, you will never rise higher. You
will probably be happier on some moderated group where those who doubt
your obiter dicta can be excluded by the moderators.

Without the slightest regret,

Andre Jute
Prime Geek

PS
We're looking for a new i-Geek motto. As a consolation prize we will
let you enter the competition to create a new motto with this line:
"You don't need global feedback to build a good-sounding amplifier."
-- Henry Pasternack



Andre,

You simply can't deal with people who are your intellectual and moral
superiors. QED.

Jon

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

On May 7, 3:56 pm, Andre Jute wrote:
From the desk of

Andre Jute, Capo di Capo Tuti
Internet Guru Issuing Council
In the seventh year after the Magnequest Scum ran way

To
Pompass Plodnick
aka Henry Pasternack
Place de la Place Secure Institute for the Incorrigible

Dear Plod

i-Geek (sponsored by Apple Corporation) has again reviewed your
application to the sinecure of Guru on RAT. In view of your deplorable
record, including repeatedly lying on professional matters,
allegations about children, your malicious persecution of individuals
who refuse to respect the Stanford degree you brag about, and your
association with the antisocial Magnequest Scum, it was an easy
decision for the Junior Appointments Commission of i-Geek to place you
at the bottom of the list. Frankly, you will never rise higher. You
will probably be happier on some moderated group where those who doubt
your obiter dicta can be excluded by the moderators.

Without the slightest regret,

Andre Jute
Prime Geek

PS
We're looking for a new i-Geek motto. As a consolation prize we will
let you enter the competition to create a new motto with this line:
"You don't need global feedback to build a good-sounding amplifier."
-- Henry Pasternack

How about settling your insignificant arguments with insignificant
persons by a boxing contest or something like that and keeping it
private.?
Who cares about either of you?
Ludovic Mirabel
L

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

"Jon Yaeger" wrote in message
...
in article , Andre
Jute
at wrote on 5/7/07 6:56 PM:

From the desk of
Andre Jute, Capo di Capo Tuti
Internet Guru Issuing Council
In the seventh year after the Magnequest Scum ran way

To
Pompass Plodnick
aka Henry Pasternack
Place de la Place Secure Institute for the Incorrigible

Dear Plod

i-Geek (sponsored by Apple Corporation) has again reviewed your
application to the sinecure of Guru on RAT. In view of your deplorable
record, including repeatedly lying on professional matters,
allegations about children, your malicious persecution of individuals
who refuse to respect the Stanford degree you brag about, and your
association with the antisocial Magnequest Scum, it was an easy
decision for the Junior Appointments Commission of i-Geek to place you
at the bottom of the list. Frankly, you will never rise higher. You
will probably be happier on some moderated group where those who doubt
your obiter dicta can be excluded by the moderators.

Without the slightest regret,

Andre Jute
Prime Geek

PS
We're looking for a new i-Geek motto. As a consolation prize we will
let you enter the competition to create a new motto with this line:
"You don't need global feedback to build a good-sounding amplifier."
-- Henry Pasternack

How about: "You don't need global feedback to build a good sounding
amplifier, when you get local feedback from the Capo di Capo Tuti Rodent."

CdCTR= AJ
local feedback= advice

Andre,

You simply can't deal with people who are your intellectual and moral
superiors. QED.

Jon, can Andre deal with you?

west

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

Jon:

As the moon goes through its phases, McCoy will go through its changes
in the same predictable, mechanical sequence. In a Planetary Body it
is reassuring. In what might otherwise pass as a human being it is
utterly pathetic.

McCoy is picking a fight for attention. Whatever passes for its "home
life" is so limited and so insubstantial that it must seek
gratification elsewhere. So Middius' exudations and West's yappings
are the manna in its empty desert of an existance.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

Ludo said:

How about settling your insignificant arguments with insignificant
persons by a boxing contest or something like that and keeping it
private.?

Oh, really now. Usenet feuds are the main events these days. The
"serious" discussions have become the sideshows. If you can't laugh at
Jute vs. Whoever, or Morein vs. McCarty, or Everybody vs. Krooger, why
bother to read the audio groups at all?

Who cares about either of you?

You're definitely getting crankier lately. Problems in Paradise?



--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

in article 01T%h.2059$wy2.1691@trnddc03, west at wrote on
5/8/07 12:29 AM:

"Jon Yaeger" wrote in message
...
in article , Andre
Jute
at wrote on 5/7/07 6:56 PM:

From the desk of
Andre Jute, Capo di Capo Tuti
Internet Guru Issuing Council
In the seventh year after the Magnequest Scum ran way

To
Pompass Plodnick
aka Henry Pasternack
Place de la Place Secure Institute for the Incorrigible

Dear Plod

i-Geek (sponsored by Apple Corporation) has again reviewed your
application to the sinecure of Guru on RAT. In view of your deplorable
record, including repeatedly lying on professional matters,
allegations about children, your malicious persecution of individuals
who refuse to respect the Stanford degree you brag about, and your
association with the antisocial Magnequest Scum, it was an easy
decision for the Junior Appointments Commission of i-Geek to place you
at the bottom of the list. Frankly, you will never rise higher. You
will probably be happier on some moderated group where those who doubt
your obiter dicta can be excluded by the moderators.

Without the slightest regret,

Andre Jute
Prime Geek

PS
We're looking for a new i-Geek motto. As a consolation prize we will
let you enter the competition to create a new motto with this line:
"You don't need global feedback to build a good-sounding amplifier."
-- Henry Pasternack

How about: "You don't need global feedback to build a good sounding
amplifier, when you get local feedback from the Capo di Capo Tuti Rodent."

CdCTR= AJ
local feedback= advice

Andre,

You simply can't deal with people who are your intellectual and moral
superiors. QED.

Jon, can Andre deal with you?

west


Pest,

I wasn't talking about me. I was talking about Henry, who, in spite of his
manner, actually designs / builds gear that WORKS; is honest; knows amp
design theory, and who has an IQ that should eclipse your idol's.

Deal with it.

Jon

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

Jon Yaeger wrote:

in article , Andre Jute
at wrote on 5/7/07 6:56 PM:

From the desk of
Andre Jute, Capo di Capo Tuti
Internet Guru Issuing Council
In the seventh year after the Magnequest Scum ran way

To
Pompass Plodnick
aka Henry Pasternack
Place de la Place Secure Institute for the Incorrigible

Dear Plod

i-Geek (sponsored by Apple Corporation) has again reviewed your
application to the sinecure of Guru on RAT. In view of your deplorable
record, including repeatedly lying on professional matters,
allegations about children, your malicious persecution of individuals
who refuse to respect the Stanford degree you brag about, and your
association with the antisocial Magnequest Scum, it was an easy
decision for the Junior Appointments Commission of i-Geek to place you
at the bottom of the list. Frankly, you will never rise higher. You
will probably be happier on some moderated group where those who doubt
your obiter dicta can be excluded by the moderators.

Without the slightest regret,

Andre Jute
Prime Geek

PS
We're looking for a new i-Geek motto. As a consolation prize we will
let you enter the competition to create a new motto with this line:
"You don't need global feedback to build a good-sounding amplifier."
-- Henry Pasternack



Andre,

You simply can't deal with people who are your intellectual and moral
superiors. QED.

Jon

I never claim to be anyone's intellectual superior; when warranted I
merely demonstrate the smallest measure of superiority the
circumstances require. Everyone with eyes in his head can see how
inferior even that modest approach makes Plodnick feel; the least
sensitive among us cringe at his overreactions. Ditto for you and
Worthless and Ludwig.

As for morality, Henry Pasternack joined with a gang of slime who
tried repeatedly to gag the free speech of anyone who could interfere
with the profits of their hero Mike LeFevre of Magnequest. That gang
sent graphic photographs of male homosexuality to a public noticeboard
people downloaded to computers their children can see. Pasternack sent
graphic male homosexual photographs directly to the home computer of a
man he didn't know where it seriously affected his two little girls
who just wanted to use the computer for their homework; the man's sole
"crime" was to have built one of my amplifier designs; it is not me
making this accusation but Bob Chernofsky, Pasternack's colleague in
the service of Creepy Mike's profits; the reason BobC gave is
particularly disgusting: "Henry was just bored because he couldn't get
at Andre." All of that stands on the Joenet archive at Harvard.
There's more, for instance Pasternack lying on professional matters in
the hope of embarrassing his "enemies", but that almost fades into
insignificance beside the pornography episodes, plural, over a period
of many months.

And you, Jon (aka John and Jono) Yaeger, crooked garage trader, want
to hold up Pasternack as a model of morality? Give over, sonny. Nobody
on RAT or UKRA is stupid enough to believe you. Earthworms won't
believe you.

Now let's see your complaint again:

You simply can't deal with people who are your intellectual and moral
superiors. QED.

I would say that I am particularly effective at making the immoral
slimeball Pasternack ridiculous in the faces of his claque of clowns.
QED. An objective observer might also point out that you, Yaeger, have
once more offered me an opportunity to put Pasternack's immorality on
the record. QED. Thanks.

As for Pasternack's self-advertised intellect, there is no need for me
to put him down for his intellectual failures since Patrick is already
running circles around Pasternack in another thread. It doesn't even
matter that Patrick is wrong in that thread, that he should just let
Chris get on with Bode and Nyquist and see if anyone learns anything
useful. The point is that Patrick makes Pasternack look like the
Pharissee he is, a pompous prattling hypocrite who doesn't practice
what he preaches with such salacious licking of condemnatory slurs.

Andre Jute
Boss Geek, QED

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

On May 8, 11:42 am, Andre Jute wrote:

usual tripe and blather.

You protest too much. As a creature consisting entirely of pretense,
you are so threatened by actual accomplishment that you must dredge up
imagined slights of the past to support your tottering and wasted self-
image. You haven't the wherewithall, intellectual or otherwise to
engage in any legitimate discussion at any level on any subject. And
if you are ever "right" in such a discussion it is purely by accident
and by facts directly cribbed from others (always without
acknowledgement). Otherwise you are nothing but pose and vapor.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

in article , Andre Jute
at wrote on 5/8/07 11:30 AM:

Jon Yaeger wrote:

in article , Andre Jute
at wrote on 5/7/07 6:56 PM:

From the desk of
Andre Jute, Capo di Capo Tuti
Internet Guru Issuing Council
In the seventh year after the Magnequest Scum ran way

To
Pompass Plodnick
aka Henry Pasternack
Place de la Place Secure Institute for the Incorrigible

Dear Plod

i-Geek (sponsored by Apple Corporation) has again reviewed your
application to the sinecure of Guru on RAT. In view of your deplorable
record, including repeatedly lying on professional matters,
allegations about children, your malicious persecution of individuals
who refuse to respect the Stanford degree you brag about, and your
association with the antisocial Magnequest Scum, it was an easy
decision for the Junior Appointments Commission of i-Geek to place you
at the bottom of the list. Frankly, you will never rise higher. You
will probably be happier on some moderated group where those who doubt
your obiter dicta can be excluded by the moderators.

Without the slightest regret,

Andre Jute
Prime Geek

PS
We're looking for a new i-Geek motto. As a consolation prize we will
let you enter the competition to create a new motto with this line:
"You don't need global feedback to build a good-sounding amplifier."
-- Henry Pasternack



Andre,

You simply can't deal with people who are your intellectual and moral
superiors. QED.

Jon

I never claim to be anyone's intellectual superior; when warranted I
merely demonstrate the smallest measure of superiority the
circumstances require. Everyone with eyes in his head can see how
inferior even that modest approach makes Plodnick feel; the least
sensitive among us cringe at his overreactions. Ditto for you and
Worthless and Ludwig.

As for morality, Henry Pasternack joined with a gang of slime who
tried repeatedly to gag the free speech of anyone who could interfere
with the profits of their hero Mike LeFevre of Magnequest.

**** I wasn't around RAT when the supposed sin occurred, but all of my
business & conversations with Mike have been cordial & honest, which is more
than I can say for you. I ordered a pair of Dyna A410s from him which
surprised me because they were not potted like the original pair I have. I
could empirically compare OEM vs. Mike's versions. I have a 100 Mhz. scope,
Heath signal generator, distortion analyzer, frequency counter, spectrum
analyzer, yoke tester, cap & R meters, etc., but no L measuring gear. If
someone cares to describe a simple comparison test using the gear I have I
will set it up and try it when time permits. Then we can see if there is
any basis to your negative claims of product inferiority.

That gang
sent graphic photographs of male homosexuality to a public noticeboard
people downloaded to computers their children can see. Pasternack sent
graphic male homosexual photographs directly to the home computer of a
man he didn't know where it seriously affected his two little girls
who just wanted to use the computer for their homework; the man's sole
"crime" was to have built one of my amplifier designs; it is not me
making this accusation but Bob Chernofsky, Pasternack's colleague in
the service of Creepy Mike's profits; the reason BobC gave is
particularly disgusting: "Henry was just bored because he couldn't get
at Andre."

Henry vigorously denies this. And you know what? I believe him because
you've totally fabricated bull**** about me and my business ethics, etc. so
I know YOU are a liar.

All of that stands on the Joenet archive at Harvard.
There's more, for instance Pasternack lying on professional matters in
the hope of embarrassing his "enemies", but that almost fades into
insignificance beside the pornography episodes, plural, over a period
of many months.

And you, Jon (aka John and Jono) Yaeger, crooked garage trader, want
to hold up Pasternack as a model of morality? Give over, sonny. Nobody
on RAT or UKRA is stupid enough to believe you. Earthworms won't
believe you.

All I can say is that the man has been totally honest and forthright with
me; I can't speak for his past actions nor do I care. You, on the other
hand, have almost always been full of ****.


Now let's see your complaint again:

You simply can't deal with people who are your intellectual and moral
superiors. QED.

I would say that I am particularly effective at making the immoral
slimeball Pasternack ridiculous in the faces of his claque of clowns.
QED. An objective observer might also point out that you, Yaeger, have
once more offered me an opportunity to put Pasternack's immorality on
the record. QED. Thanks.

*** All you seem to offer are groundless allegations in the cases you make
about others. You seem to believe that if you repeat them often enough they
will be true. I suspect that is a part of your personality disorder that
makes you do this; you have done it time after time on this NG and that is
certainly "historical record."

As for Pasternack's self-advertised intellect, there is no need for me
to put him down for his intellectual failures since Patrick is already
running circles around Pasternack in another thread. It doesn't even
matter that Patrick is wrong in that thread, that he should just let
Chris get on with Bode and Nyquist and see if anyone learns anything
useful. The point is that Patrick makes Pasternack look like the
Pharissee he is, a pompous prattling hypocrite who doesn't practice
what he preaches with such salacious licking of condemnatory slurs.

*** I'll take Henry's abrupt, condescending manner and pontificating any
day over your verbal effluent any day, my friend.


Andre Jute
Boss Geek, QED

i-Geek rejects Pompass Plodnick again
 

"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message
...


Ludo said:

How about settling your insignificant arguments with insignificant
persons by a boxing contest or something like that and keeping it
private.?

Oh, really now. Usenet feuds are the main events these days. The
"serious" discussions have become the sideshows. If you can't laugh at
Jute vs. Whoever, or Morein vs. McCarty, or Everybody vs. Krooger, why
bother to read the audio groups at all?

Who cares about either of you?

You're definitely getting crankier lately. Problems in Paradise?



--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

I have to agree. It's like Payton Place for tubes or the Tube Reality Show.
No one will ever admit to finding it compelling, but here we are. By the way
Ludovic, I think it was over 5 years ago that I suggested that these guys
settle things the old fashion way; pistols at dawn. Aaron "Andre" Burr vs.
Alexander "Patrick" Hamilton. That's right; from the "Turneroid" days...I
think; coulda been the Mob days...sheesh, its all so confusing fer cryin'
out loud.

Mark the Damn Shark