![]() |
Speaker Recommendation
On 23 May, 11:59, Christopher Key wrote:
Hello, I'm looking to get a new set of speakers, and am trying to get some sort of idea where I should be looking price wise. They'll be used for music about 75% of the time, and for home cinema, 25% of the time, and will be driven by a Denon AVR1804 for now. My music collection's quite varied, although I'd probably want the best performance on fairly punchy classical, think Holst's Planet Suite, Jazz, and instrumental solos, think Dire Straits' Your Latest Trick. I'd also like something that does a good job rendering speech. As a starting point, I'm looking at the Quad L-ite package, or the Quad L2 range (22L2 front, 12L2 surround, L2 centre, L2 sub). I know it's very difficult to express how subjectively 'good' something will sound, given the immense price range available for speakers. Perhaps someone could give me some indication where these speakers sit in the following range: Good enough to discern 128kbps mp3 from uncompressed on challenging material Good enough to discern 320kbps mp3 from uncompressed on challenging material Additional money better spent improving the acoustics of a typical room Sufficiently transparent to be inaudibly different from other similarly priced speakers Sufficiently transparent to be inaudibly different from a known voice speaking to you Obviously I will compare the speakers to others in a similar price bracket, along with a few more expensive and cheaper models, but I'd appreciated some guidance first. Regards, Chris DYNAUDIO...nuff said. |
Speaker Recommendation
borosteve wrote:
On 23 May, 11:59, Christopher Key wrote: As a starting point, I'm looking at the Quad L-ite package, or the Quad L2 range (22L2 front, 12L2 surround, L2 centre, L2 sub). DYNAUDIO...nuff said. Any particular ranges you'd recommend? Chris |
Speaker Recommendation
Christopher Key wrote:
borosteve wrote: On 23 May, 11:59, Christopher Key wrote: As a starting point, I'm looking at the Quad L-ite package, or the Quad L2 range (22L2 front, 12L2 surround, L2 centre, L2 sub). DYNAUDIO...nuff said. Any particular ranges you'd recommend? Chris I've got some 42s and Contour 1.1s. Smashing speakers, and they generally go for half retail on ebay. Couple of points: - the Contours sound a fair bit smoother than the 42s, and go a lot lower; - IMO they need a powerful amp to drive them properly, but I've not done a proper blind test, and recent debate in this NG tends to suggest most modern amps should drive them properly to decent sound levels; - they're best a foot or so away from walls I use them with the telly from time to time, and have a REL sub (Strata 5). It's all a hoot on films, but I'm not completely sold on the sub with music. Dynaudios are a pretty tough buy new - you seem to get very little for your money. Give them a listen and see what you think. I was in my local hifi shop recently and the blokey was begging me to listen to the latest range - I just daren't ;-) IMO, YMMV etc - have a listen if you can. Rob |
Speaker Recommendation
"Rob" wrote in message ... Christopher Key wrote: borosteve wrote: On 23 May, 11:59, Christopher Key wrote: As a starting point, I'm looking at the Quad L-ite package, or the Quad L2 range (22L2 front, 12L2 surround, L2 centre, L2 sub). DYNAUDIO...nuff said. Any particular ranges you'd recommend? Chris I've got some 42s and Contour 1.1s. Smashing speakers, and they generally go for half retail on ebay. Couple of points: - the Contours sound a fair bit smoother than the 42s, and go a lot lower; - IMO they need a powerful amp to drive them properly, but I've not done a proper blind test, and recent debate in this NG tends to suggest most modern amps should drive them properly to decent sound levels; - they're best a foot or so away from walls I use them with the telly from time to time, and have a REL sub (Strata 5). It's all a hoot on films, but I'm not completely sold on the sub with music. Dynaudios are a pretty tough buy new - you seem to get very little for your money. Give them a listen and see what you think. I was in my local hifi shop recently and the blokey was begging me to listen to the latest range - I just daren't ;-) IMO, YMMV etc - have a listen if you can. Rob I would certainly agree that Dynaudios are well worth considering. Try also PMC, ADAM and ATC. S -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
Speaker Recommendation
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message ... "Rob" wrote in message ... Christopher Key wrote: borosteve wrote: On 23 May, 11:59, Christopher Key wrote: As a starting point, I'm looking at the Quad L-ite package, or the Quad L2 range (22L2 front, 12L2 surround, L2 centre, L2 sub). DYNAUDIO...nuff said. Any particular ranges you'd recommend? Chris I've got some 42s and Contour 1.1s. Smashing speakers, and they generally go for half retail on ebay. Couple of points: - the Contours sound a fair bit smoother than the 42s, and go a lot lower; - IMO they need a powerful amp to drive them properly, but I've not done a proper blind test, and recent debate in this NG tends to suggest most modern amps should drive them properly to decent sound levels; - they're best a foot or so away from walls I use them with the telly from time to time, and have a REL sub (Strata 5). It's all a hoot on films, but I'm not completely sold on the sub with music. Dynaudios are a pretty tough buy new - you seem to get very little for your money. Give them a listen and see what you think. I was in my local hifi shop recently and the blokey was begging me to listen to the latest range - I just daren't ;-) IMO, YMMV etc - have a listen if you can. Rob I would certainly agree that Dynaudios are well worth considering. Try also PMC, ADAM and ATC. You *are* Stewart (Pinky) Pinkerton and I claim my five pounds... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk