Picked up from a reply by Sander to Worthless Wieckless:

Peter Wieck said:
[snip]
the actual cause of Patrick's
concern (as I read it) and mine. Which are pestiferous questions of an
open-ended nature delivered by (an) individual(s) who either know
better or will never know better by established habits.

"pestiferous"
"(an) individual(s) who either know better or will never know better"
"by established habits"

Like Jews, eh, Worthless? And you're qualified to judge who fits the
condemned category, presumably by virtue of your "pure blood", eh?

You can take Wiecky out of Germany but you can never take the Nazi out
of Wieck.

Andre Jute
Zero tolerance for the enemies of society

"Andre Jute" wrote in message habits.

"pestiferous"
"(an) individual(s) who either know better or will never know better"
"by established habits"

Like Jews, eh, Worthless? And you're qualified to judge who fits the
condemned category, presumably by virtue of your "pure blood", eh?

You can take Wiecky out of Germany but you can never take the Nazi out
of Wieck.

Andre Jute
Zero tolerance for the enemies of society


Run along and play somewhere else jute, You should get together with
Turner, you would make a fine pair

On Jun 9, 11:49 pm, "bassett" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message habits.

"pestiferous"
"(an) individual(s) who either know better or will never know better"
"by established habits"

Like Jews, eh, Worthless? And you're qualified to judge who fits the
condemned category, presumably by virtue of your "pure blood", eh?


If it weren't for Jews there would be no hi-fi industry and maybe
even not a recording industry itself.

That said, no one group should control the nation's media. Not Arabs,
not Baptists, not Catholics, not Mormons, not the Jehovah's Witnesses.
And for damn sure not the Jews, who are a race and a religion and
smarter than the average white person to boot. If it were OK for the
Jews to control Whites, wouldn't it be OK for Whtes to dominate blacks
and Blacks to dominate aborigines?