![]() |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
In article et, Deputy
Dumbya Dawg writes "Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:26:57 +0200, "Mogens V." wrote: Of cause not. However, I fail to see how the fixed room can provide what's not present in a 2D stereo recording. But, somehow, you CAN get 3D from 2-channel playback. It's non-intuitive, and easy to argue against. But it happens. Rather like the infinite resolution of analogue versus the quantised resolution of digital :-) Tell you what. Put Madonna's Immaculate Collection on and if you don't hear 3d from your stereo with that overdone example of a recording your system is being drown out by the acoustics of your room. No matter how much you spend on equipment you will never hear the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. It amazes me how people will spend thousands on cables and new tubes and then wonder why they cant hear anything different. Possibly they don't know anything about how to do so?.. Like putting Channel #5 on a pig and wondering why all you can smell is pig in the morning. Chanel 5 mon ami;) peace dawg -- Tony Sayer |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
tony sayer wrote:
In article et, Deputy Dumbya Dawg writes "Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:26:57 +0200, "Mogens V." wrote: Of cause not. However, I fail to see how the fixed room can provide what's not present in a 2D stereo recording. But, somehow, you CAN get 3D from 2-channel playback. It's non-intuitive, and easy to argue against. But it happens. Rather like the infinite resolution of analogue versus the quantised resolution of digital :-) Tell you what. Put Madonna's Immaculate Collection on and if you don't hear 3d from your stereo with that overdone example of a recording your system is being drown out by the acoustics of your room. No matter how much you spend on equipment you will never hear the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. It amazes me how people will spend thousands on cables and new tubes and then wonder why they cant hear anything different. Possibly they don't know anything about how to do so?.. That, and that a sound treated room doesn't look like a normal living room, plus furnitures gets arranged according to indoor decoration rules, leaving those speakers to look nicer and unobtrusive halfways hidden next to some bookshelf. Yes, I'm aware nice looking materials do exist; still... -- Kind regards, Mogens V. |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
No matter how much you spend on equipment you will never hear
the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. It amazes me how people will spend thousands on cables and new tubes and then wonder why they cant hear anything different. Possibly they don't know anything about how to do so?.. That, and that a sound treated room doesn't look like a normal living room, plus furnitures gets arranged according to indoor decoration rules, leaving those speakers to look nicer and unobtrusive halfways hidden next to some bookshelf. Yes, I'm aware nice looking materials do exist; still... Come to that any websites advising on the subject?.... -- Tony Sayer |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
On Jul 5, 4:36 pm, wrote:
Has anybody tried using a studio reverb unit, or other processors, with a hi-fi system? Yes. It turns the hi-fi into my-fi. |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
tony sayer wrote:
No matter how much you spend on equipment you will never hear the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. It amazes me how people will spend thousands on cables and new tubes and then wonder why they cant hear anything different. Possibly they don't know anything about how to do so?.. That, and that a sound treated room doesn't look like a normal living room, plus furnitures gets arranged according to indoor decoration rules, leaving those speakers to look nicer and unobtrusive halfways hidden next to some bookshelf. Yes, I'm aware nice looking materials do exist; still... Come to that any websites advising on the subject?.... Surely quite a lot, like these ones: http://www.ethanwiner.com/acoustics.html http://www.realtraps.com/ http://www.whealy.com/drumming/Soundproofing/index.html http://www.rivesaudio.com/ http://www.soundproofing.org/sales/GreenGlue.htm http://www.hometheatershack.com/roomeq/ http://www.ymec.com/products/rade/ Not really links to materials, but search for what's mentioned. Sometimes just pics of how it's been done can be helpful. -- Kind regards, Mogens V. |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
No matter how much you spend on equipment, you will
never hear the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. This is a misleading statement -- its opposite (or contrapositive) is not true -- good room acoustics do not guarantee the audibility of detail if the electronics and speakers don't deliver it. Ideally, you want both good (that is, appropriate for playback) acoustics, and good equipment. |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
William Sommerwerck wrote:
No matter how much you spend on equipment, you will never hear the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. This is a misleading statement -- its opposite (or contrapositive) is not true -- good room acoustics do not guarantee the audibility of detail if the electronics and speakers don't deliver it. Ideally, you want both good (that is, appropriate for playback) acoustics, and good equipment. Well, he has a point, despite some choise of phrasings... 'won't hear _all_ detail' and 'acoustically treated' would be better. If rooms would have to be fully optimized, not many private homes would have a decent musical experience. I agree that large expenditure on equipment may be a halfways waste in a less than adequate room, but even so, it will help - it's just the wrong way around, of cause. Many years ago I was totally broke and couldn't afford good gear. All I had was a Kodak Photo CD player into an Aiwa gettoblaster with somewhat decent amplifier, provided modest listening levels. I was working in a shop building amps, speakers and lights for band rental, and grapped hi quality filter components and a set of Wifa trebles for my set of seemingly crappy Philips speakers with 6½" drivers and slaves. I modified the drivers/slaves spider suspension, treated the paper cones against breakups and reinforced the boxes. Put the whole setup up on mic stands to get it off floor coupling. The room was quite good with a large carpet and bookshelves to partially break refelctions. A bass problem in a corner was solved with a large foam matress wrapped in thick velvet cloth behind a bookshelve. We had a bunch of hifi freaks in'n'out of the shop. One of them paid me a visit and was all open mouth in shock over the sound quality from such crappy gear. Once I got my used Hieraga class A amp copy, things changed incredibly. This is of cause nothing but a totally irrelevant (high end wise) story, but still serves to point out the importance of even just very modest room treatment and especially decent (modified) speakers. -- Kind regards, Mogens V. |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
"tony sayer" wrote in message ... No matter how much you spend on equipment you will never hear the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. It amazes me how people will spend thousands on cables and new tubes and then wonder why they cant hear anything different. Possibly they don't know anything about how to do so?.. That, and that a sound treated room doesn't look like a normal living room, plus furnitures gets arranged according to indoor decoration rules, leaving those speakers to look nicer and unobtrusive halfways hidden next to some bookshelf. Yes, I'm aware nice looking materials do exist; still... Come to that any websites advising on the subject?.... -- Tony Sayer http://www.recording.org/forum-34.html http://forum.studiotips.com/index.php peace dawg |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message . .. No matter how much you spend on equipment, you will never hear the detail that is in the recordings if your room is not acoustically optimized. This is a misleading statement -- its opposite (or contrapositive) is not true -- good room acoustics do not guarantee the audibility of detail if the electronics and speakers don't deliver it. Ideally, you want both good (that is, appropriate for playback) acoustics, and good equipment. But no matter how good the equipment and recording techniques, the program in recordings will be masked by room issues if the equipment is listened to in an untreated room. Guaranteed. peace dawg |
Adding reverb to hi-fi
But no matter how good the equipment and recording techniques,
the program in recordings will be masked by room issues if the equipment is listened to in an untreated room. Guaranteed. You're overstating the case. "Masked by" -- without qualification -- implies it isn't audible at all. Which is not true. It's rather that the better the setup (including treatment), the more one can hear what the recording "really" sounds like. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk