![]() |
Why "accuracy"?
"George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message ... Oh, so by "accuracy" you mean to convey something as blunt as not substituting strings for horns. Of course we can all agree with that. Same thing.... Maybe to you.... George. Don't you remember the good old days when violins used on recording sessions were fitted with horns, rather like those found on old phonographs? I once did an "acoustic recording" straight to wax, just as they used to do in the 20s. I copied the studio layout from the famous RCA photograph. The recording machine had two horns, set 180 degrees apart, one for the vocal one for the orchestra. You controlled the record level and balance by carefully sliding a piece of angora wool in the mouths of the recording horns. That may well be the origin of the word "pad" (attenuator) Now, that's "accuracy" :-) Regards Iain |
Why "accuracy"?
"Iain Churches" wrote in message i.fi... "George M. Middius" cmndr _ george @ comcast . net wrote in message ... Oh, so by "accuracy" you mean to convey something as blunt as not substituting strings for horns. Of course we can all agree with that. Same thing.... Maybe to you.... George. Don't you remember the good old days when violins used on recording sessions were fitted with horns, rather like those found on old phonographs? I once did an "acoustic recording" straight to wax, just as they used to do in the 20s. I copied the studio layout from the famous RCA photograph. The recording machine had two horns, set 180 degrees apart, one for the vocal one for the orchestra. You controlled the record level and balance by carefully sliding a piece of angora wool in the mouths of the recording horns. That may well be the origin of the word "pad" (attenuator) Now, that's "accuracy" :-) I wonder if George can bring himself to admit why people stopped making recordings by purely mechanical means. Why people stopped using vinyl and tubes in the mainstream. Hint: it had a lot to do with a desire for greater sonic accuracy. |
Why "accuracy"?
Hi RATs!
Alternate hint: CDs are cheaper to reproduce and have a much higher "yield". Get over it. CD companies want to make money, too. Happy Ears! Al |
Why "accuracy"?
"tubegarden" wrote in message oups.com... Hi RATs! Alternate hint: CDs are cheaper to reproduce and have a much higher "yield". This was not true for the first 5 or more years that CDs were produced. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk