Why "accuracy"?
 

On Sep 5, 5:50 pm, John Atkinson
wrote:

But thank you for allowing me to end the day on an upbeat note.

Mpfff... Arny has all the single-minded and largely ignorant arrogance
of Mr. Jute without even a scintilla of the latter's entertainment
value. The "commander" is the hagfish that sucks on both of them and
would be inert without them.

http://www.seasky.org/monsters/sea7a1q.html

Just a brief perusal makes the connection clear.

That Arny could be entertaining would only be by accident, never
design.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

Why "accuracy"?
 

"Peter Wieck" wrote in message
ups.com...

That Arny could be entertaining would only be by accident, never
design.

Many have told me that what I did to Mr. Atkinson at HE2005 was quite
amusing to them.

Why "accuracy"?
 

The Krooborg tries yet again to revise history.

Many have told me that what I did to Mr. Atkinson at HE2005 was quite
amusing to them.

A human being would never say something so blatantly wrongheaded. Therefore
we know for certain that you, Arnii Krooborg, are not human.

BTW, Turdy, we all heard the recording. Humor was the furthest thing from
your "mind".

Why "accuracy"?
 

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..

"Peter Wieck" wrote in message
ups.com...

On Sep 5, 3:21 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

It's called "English".

Sure. Words gathered at random from the English Language, rarely
assembled in a superficially clever way entirely irrespective of
meaning or content.

As to Arny's ability to "guess", I would expect from his manner that
he leaves nothing to guesswork, only certainty. The sign of a closed
mind if nothing else.

Musta been a mini-stroke that has left your mind in such a confused state,
Peter.

I'm well known among my friends for both my careful work and out-of-the
box thinking.

Do both of them subscribe to your 'out of the tomb' mythology also?


Its an effective pairing - think outside the box and then test well to
know for sure whether the new idea actually works.

C'mon Arnie; that square head (box) of yours never lets a single idea
escape, be it muse, reverie or lateral logic, much less test it for
accuracy. Even your web site is a testament (no pun intended) to better
times, i.e. when there WERE thoughts of any consequence.
But to (reluctantly) quote the Rolling Stones (take note Mr. Borg) 'It's all
over now".

ruff

Why "accuracy"?
 

John Atkinson wrote:

On Sep 5, 9:23 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

The recording of the "Great Debate" can be heard at
http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Couldn't be bothered to listen to an hour of it, but the article is
interesting. Anybody who can hear a significant improvement in the sound of
a system by replacing the power cable is either seriously deluded or in
possession of a complete piece of crap as a system.

Owning a $2.5K power cable is indicative of two things, an excess of money
and a lack of brains.

Keith

Why "accuracy"?
 

On 6 Sep, 03:02, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:
John Atkinson said:

I'm well known among my friends for both my careful work
and out-of-the box thinking.
Snort! Now I've got coffee coming out my nose! The last time
your name came up in conversation with someone you have
referred to on this newsgroup as a "friend," Mr. Krueger, that
wasn't exactly how he characterised your behavior! :-)

I'm surprised you didn't know that in automotive circles, "box" is
synonymous with "ashtray".


I just assumed he finally brought his head out of
the abx box.

Why "accuracy"?
 

On 6 Sep, 03:53, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message

ups.com...

That Arny could be entertaining would only be by accident, never
design.

Many have told me that what I did to Mr. Atkinson at HE2005 was quite
amusing to them.

Why "accuracy"?
 

On Sep 5, 9:23 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:
The Krooborg tries yet again to revise history.
Many have told me that what I did to Mr. Atkinson at HE2005
was quite amusing to them.

...we all heard the recording.

The recording of the "Great Debate" can be heard at
http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ .

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Why "accuracy"?
 

On Sep 6, 7:11 am, John Atkinson
wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:23 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

The Krooborg tries yet again to revise history.
Many have told me that what I did to Mr. Atkinson at HE2005
was quite amusing to them.

...we all heard the recording.

The recording of the "Great Debate" can be heard athttp://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Read a bit, listened a bit. Gagged early on.

The problem with extreme views and closely held beliefs is that they
may as well be religion. On a religious level, no arguments are valid
as they necessarily debate closely held beliefs based on extreme
views. As conversion ain't gonna happen nohow, nothing gonna change
other than the expenditure of vast amounts of hot air, blather and
general idiocy.

Why isn't this obvious enough to get the keepers of said beliefs (all
sides as there are many more than two) to simpy shut up and enjoy
themselves? The single alternative is continued rancor. And while
invective is good fun it accomplishes little.

Sadly such debates gather hagfish, remora and other bottom feeders
about the combatants searching for cuts to infect and bits of flesh
and blood in the water. Hence we have the likes of the "commander" and
others.

The lot of you, in the words of Howland Owl ought to stick your
collective and several heads in a bucket of water three times, but
pull it out twice.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA
Kutztown Space 338

Why "accuracy"?
 

"roughplanet" wrote in message
u...

C'mon Arnie; that square head (box) of yours never lets a single idea
escape, be it muse, reverie or lateral logic, much less test it for
accuracy.

Rough, I have to admit that it really makes me chuckle when a know-nothing
like you tries to lecture me about having creative thoughts or sharing
ideas. Other than repackaging poetic prose cribbed from high end ragazines,
what creative thought have you ever expressed on Usenet?