|
|
Do the DVHRC support Worthless Wiecky's thuggery? was Peter
I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown
Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC) is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened. On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote: On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response. Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC thereby condemning? Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a response? Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other people's houses as beneath a response? Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would have been so much smarter to remain silent. With sympathy, Andre Jute "Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot |
Do the DVHRC support Worthless Wiecky's thuggery? was Peter
|
Do the DVHRC support Worthless Wiecky's thuggery? was Peter
To Andre Jute:
OK, I am fed up with you now. You have not posted anything on this newsgroup (rec.antiques.radio+phono) that would be helpful or even remotely useful to anyone. Peter, on the other hand, has been very helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice, giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing seminars at Kutztown. So GO AWAY! STOP posting here, unless you have something interesting to contribute about antique radios. You are VERY annoying, and that is putting it mildly. I am now going to add you to my filter list, so I will never be able to receive e-mail or posts from you ever again. PS: I apologize to all good forum members for putting up with my rant. PS: Andre Jute: GO AWAY!! wrote: I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC) is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened. On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote: On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response. Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC thereby condemning? Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a response? Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other people's houses as beneath a response? Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would have been so much smarter to remain silent. With sympathy, Andre Jute "Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot -- Shawn K www.thisoldradio.com |
Do the DVHRC support Worthless Wiecky's thuggery? was Peter
On Sep 20, 7:15 pm, Chris Hornbeck
wrote: On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:04:39 -0700, Andre Jute wrote: Something Any chance you could manage to keep this nut-job stuff out of r.a.t? You're embarassing yourself, and everyone else here. Thanks, I hope, Chris Hornbeck Your message is skipping, Chris. Nudge the tone-arm gently, or pick it up and put it elsewhere, or switch over to CD. You're choosing the wrong side here, for the wrong reasons. Andre Jute |
Do the DVHRC support Worthless Wiecky's thuggery? was Peter
On Sep 20, 6:58 pm, Shawn K wrote:
To Andre Jute: OK, I am fed up with you now. It's taken you long enough. Are you often mistaken for a victim? You have not posted anything on this newsgroup (rec.antiques.radio+phono) that would be helpful or even remotely useful to anyone. Holy Moses, the boy has a point. Give him a banana. Peter, on the other hand, has been very helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice, giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing seminars at Kutztown. Like I said, Worthless Wiecky bought your corrupt ass. But, if you want his slack, lying ass, I'm here to make you an offer you can't refuse. So GO AWAY! STOP posting here, unless you have something interesting to contribute about antique radios. Old radios tinkle pleasingly when shoved off the table. Sometimes you can use the metal box inside after you strip off the crappy 2A3 and suchlike; saves punching a new case for a real amp. You are VERY annoying, and that is putting it mildly. Holy Moses. Give that boy another banana for being so observant. D'y'see, your scumbag Worthless Wiecky came to RAT specifically to persecute me. He's sent hundreds of messages for two years. Now I'm returning the favour, only of course doing it better (our view is that Worthless Wiecky is a prime incompetent -- he probably doesn't sweep too clean either about his janitorial duties). I shall keep returning the favour until you persuade the little **** to leave RAT or until he breaks. I'm taking bets on which happens first, if you're a gambler and want in, or if you merely fancy you're a better pscyhologist than I am. I am now going to add you to my filter list, so I will never be able to receive e-mail or posts from you ever again. Pity that you won't see my generous offer above. PS: I apologize to all good forum members for putting up with my rant. I haven't seen any good forum members. They all seem to assume that it is all right for scum like Worthless Peter Wieck to bully someone constantly for two years, just as long as he does it elsewhere. I have no sympathy for such insensitive and immoral people. PS: Andre Jute: GO AWAY!! When I finish my business here. wrote: I've been very careful not to drag the organising club of the Kutztown Radio Meet into the nightcart-load of trouble Peter Wieck has brought upon himself. Gray Glasser went further and removed them from suspicion by saying "the Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC) is reputable and respectable". But now some thoughtless fulminator from the DVHRC has taken it on himself to give an opinion, in a tribute thread to Worthless Wiecky no less! Bending over backwards to be fair, I have waited over a day for calmer heads to prevail and the retraction to arrive. It hasn't happened. On Sep 18, 5:33 pm, " wrote: On behalf of the DVHRC, we have been silent in regards to the prior posts, for the obvious reason that they do not deserve a response. Perhaps you will tell us, Mr Saegers, or whatever your name is, since the DVHRC is now officially taking a position that the "prior posts ... do not deserve a response", which prior posts are the DVHRC thereby condemning? Are you describing the posts supporting Peter Wieck as beneath a response? Are you describing the posts accusing Peter Wieck of crapping in other people's houses as beneath a response? Rather than choosing the lose-lose option of taking sides, you would have been so much smarter to remain silent. With sympathy, Andre Jute "Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving us wordly evidence of the fact."-- George Elliot -- Shawn Kwww.thisoldradio.com |
Do the DVHRC support Worthless Wiecky's thuggery? was Peter
In rec.antiques.radio+phono Andre Jute wrote:
Peter, on the other hand, has been very helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice, giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing seminars at Kutztown. Like I said, Worthless Wiecky bought your corrupt ass. But, if you want his slack, lying ass, I'm here to make you an offer you can't refuse. He never offered me things for free or useful advice, and still I think you are a nasty troll. Go away and do something useful with your time, if possible at all. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Maarten Bakker. |
Do the DVHRC support Worthless Wiecky's thuggery? was Peter
On Sep 21, 2:28 am, wrote:
In rec.antiques.radio+phono Andre Jute wrote: Peter, on the other hand, has been very helpful to many people here, including myself, by offering advice, giving away equipment (only asking to have postage covered), and doing seminars at Kutztown. Like I said, Worthless Wiecky bought your corrupt ass. But, if you want his slack, lying ass, I'm here to make you an offer you can't refuse. He never offered me things for free or useful advice, and still I think you are a nasty troll. Go away and do something useful with your time, if possible at all. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Maarten Bakker. First of all, Mijnheer Bakker, in English we put greetings (groet) in the salutation of letters. Second, there is nothing vriendelijk (friendly) about your spiteful little missive. Third, it is a lie for you to say: "He never offered me things for free" -- Worthless Wiecky publicly offered bribes to anyone who wished to take them; they were called "Free Mondays"; you merely weren't quick enough to take him up on it. Fourth, I'm not a troll, I'm protesting being bullied by Worthless Wiecky for two years with hundreds of denigratory messages. Fifth, far from me being "nasty", you're the nasty one for your immorality of trying to deny the victim justice. Sixth, I am doing something useful with my time: I am protecting free speech (Worthless Wiecky tried to intimidate me into silence with his bullying; he is also a blackmailer who offered to stop bullying me if I would let him control what I say and how I say it). Seventh, you are defending vicious scum, Bakker. You should take care that you don't become scum by association. I see you are at a perfectly sound university. You sound like you're a new undergraduate; if so, you'll learn. If you are a lecturer, seek the advice of someone from the Philosophy Department on logic and morality, because right now you're making a fool of yourself. Andre Jute Immovable rigour |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk