![]() |
HD-DVD is dead.
|
HD-DVD is dead.
Trevor Wilson wrote:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/19/tech...ney_technology I told you so. Trevor Wilson Makes a change for Sony to win a format war. ;-) -- Tciao for Now! John. |
HD-DVD is dead.
"Trevor Wilson" wrote
in message http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/19/tech...ney_technology I told you so. If I didn't tell them first! ;-) |
HD-DVD is dead.
"John Williamson" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/19/tech...ney_technology I told you so. Trevor Wilson Makes a change for Sony to win a format war. ;-) **It was a forgone conclusion. Sony did a bunch of things right. The main one was to ship thousands of players BEFORE significant numbers of software titles (in either format) became available. HD-DVD lost the war before it really started. Kudos to Toshiba for pulling the plug early though. Consumers can buy hardware and software with some confidence. Trevor Wilson |
HD-DVD is dead.
"John Williamson" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/19/tech...ney_technology I told you so. Trevor Wilson Makes a change for Sony to win a format war. ;-) **BTW: More than 20 years production of the Beta system can hardly be regarded as failure. Nor can many other Sony innovations. Trinitron picture tubes, Walkmans, et al. Like any company engaged in high technology, they can be expected to stumble once in awhile. I guess the bigger the company, the bigger and more embarrassing the stumbles. Trevor Wilson |
HD-DVD is dead.
Trevor Wilson wrote:
"John Williamson" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/19/tech...ney_technology I told you so. Trevor Wilson Makes a change for Sony to win a format war. ;-) **BTW: More than 20 years production of the Beta system can hardly be regarded as failure. Nor can many other Sony innovations. Trinitron picture tubes, Walkmans, et al. Like any company engaged in high technology, they can be expected to stumble once in awhile. I guess the bigger the company, the bigger and more embarrassing the stumbles. I was thinking that Beta only ever had a small part of the market, even though it was produced for a long time, MiniDv & VHS-C have mostly seen off Digital 8 & the other 8mm tape formats, the Walkman used the Philips Compact Cassette, & so on. I wouldn't say that Trinitron was a format as such, although it did give a better picture than shadowmask, if you could live with the shadow of the wires. Oh, & I know DVD was *partly* created by Sony. Sony have done a *lot* of good stuff, some of which I have bought & used regularly, their formats have never been market leaders, IIRC. Now, in the Broadcast market, it's a different story. Digibeta, anyone? :-) I was smiling as I wrote the first reaction, though. And as someone else has said, good for Toshiba for conceding defeat so soon. It's saved me having to buy at least one new player. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
HD-DVD is dead.
"John Williamson" wrote in message
... I was thinking that Beta only ever had a small part of the market, even though it was produced for a long time, I agree. MiniDv & VHS-C have mostly seen off Digital 8 & the other 8mm tape formats, I'm not sure that I agree with that analysis. VHS-C was launched head-to-head with the original 8mm tape format. The supposed advantage of VHS-C was that the tapes could be played back (with the aid of an adaptor) on an ordinary VHS VCR. On the other hand 8mm offered better picture and sound quality and longer recording time per tape. So VHS-C appealed more to the casual user and 8mm to the enthusiast. Later we had both S-VHS-C and Hi8. Again Hi8 was the choice of the enthusiast, indeed it was good enough to be used professionally and there were Hi8 camcorders and editing decks made for the professional market. When Digital 8 was launched Sony clearly decided *not* to offer it as a pro or semi-pro option, all the D8 camcorders were clearly aimed strictly at the amateur market, the selling point being the ability of D8 camcorders to play back analogue 8mm and Hi8 tapes. On the other hand there were semi-pro MiniDV camcorders available. IMO this is a pity as I've found D8 to be a far more robust format than MiniDV, as good as DVCAM, let down only by the lack of D8 camcorders with the performance and features expected in the semi-pro market. If you want an example of a failed format that almost brought a huge electronics company to it's knees I'd like to nominate RCA's Selectavision video-disc system. David. |
HD-DVD is dead.
In article , Trevor Wilson
wrote: Consumers can buy hardware and software with some confidence. I wonder... I am still cautious of the small surface spot size and shallow depth for the information layer of Blu Ray. I am personally happy to wait and allow the long term reliabilty to be tested by others. :-) Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html |
HD-DVD is dead.
David Looser wrote:
"John Williamson" wrote in message ... I was thinking that Beta only ever had a small part of the market, even though it was produced for a long time, I agree. MiniDv & VHS-C have mostly seen off Digital 8 & the other 8mm tape formats, I'm not sure that I agree with that analysis. VHS-C was launched head-to-head with the original 8mm tape format. The supposed advantage of VHS-C was that the tapes could be played back (with the aid of an adaptor) on an ordinary VHS VCR. On the other hand 8mm offered better picture and sound quality and longer recording time per tape. So VHS-C appealed more to the casual user and 8mm to the enthusiast. Later we had both S-VHS-C and Hi8. Again Hi8 was the choice of the enthusiast, indeed it was good enough to be used professionally and there were Hi8 camcorders and editing decks made for the professional market. Possibly I should have mentioned the consumer market, I just took that as read. Hi8 was about the same picture quality as low band U-Matic, I think, S-VHS a tad lower? When Digital 8 was launched Sony clearly decided *not* to offer it as a pro or semi-pro option, all the D8 camcorders were clearly aimed strictly at the amateur market, the selling point being the ability of D8 camcorders to play back analogue 8mm and Hi8 tapes. On the other hand there were semi-pro MiniDV camcorders available. IMO this is a pity as I've found D8 to be a far more robust format than MiniDV, as good as DVCAM, let down only by the lack of D8 camcorders with the performance and features expected in the semi-pro market. I've seen a *lot* of Sony gear in Professional & semi-professional hands over the years, but not a lot in amateur hands. I've no great experience of the reliability of the Sony D8 stuff, but a lot of the problems I've read about with MiniDV relate to using more than one brand of tape in the machine. Sony also had their pro market to protect, so I'd not expect them to push the D8 stuff as professional quality. ;-) If you want an example of a failed format that almost brought a huge electronics company to it's knees I'd like to nominate RCA's Selectavision video-disc system. Quite... -- Tciao for Now! John. |
HD-DVD is dead.
"John Williamson" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: "John Williamson" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/19/tech...ney_technology I told you so. Trevor Wilson Makes a change for Sony to win a format war. ;-) **BTW: More than 20 years production of the Beta system can hardly be regarded as failure. Nor can many other Sony innovations. Trinitron picture tubes, Walkmans, et al. Like any company engaged in high technology, they can be expected to stumble once in awhile. I guess the bigger the company, the bigger and more embarrassing the stumbles. I was thinking that Beta only ever had a small part of the market, even though it was produced for a long time, **A mistake many people make. Apple only have a small part of the computer market, compared to PCs. However, they are one of the largest single manufacturers of personal computers. Same deal with Beta machines. There was only small number of manufacturers of Beta machines and a large number of VHS manufacturers. Sony, however, was still one of the largest (and, presumably, most profitable) manufacturers of video recorders. MiniDv & VHS-C have mostly seen off Digital 8 & the other 8mm tape formats, the Walkman used the Philips Compact Cassette, & so on. I wouldn't say that Trinitron was a format as such, although it did give a better picture than shadowmask, if you could live with the shadow of the wires. Oh, & I know DVD was *partly* created by Sony. **As was the Compact DiskT. One should never write-off Sony as a serious innovator. Trevor Wilson |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk