Something struck me the other day whilst reading this group.

All these "do they/don't they" arguments about speaker cables and
interconnects... if there is a difference then the likes of Pinkerton,
Phil Allison, Krueger etc are so busy trying to out-Tourettes each other
that they wouldn't be able to hear it over the swearing anyway.

And these people expect us to take one word they say seriously?

--
Squirrel Solutions Ltd Tel: (01453) 845735
http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ Fax: (01453) 843773

Registered in England: 05877408

Glenn Richards wrote:

And these people expect us to take one word they say seriously?


Nutters, the lot of them :-)

OT:/
Which 'Bit-Perfect' soundcard did you end up with?

--
Adrian C

"Glenn Richards" wrote in
message

Something struck me the other day whilst reading this
group.

All these "do they/don't they" arguments about speaker
cables and interconnects... if there is a difference then
the likes of Pinkerton, Phil Allison, Krueger etc are so
busy trying to out-Tourettes each other that they
wouldn't be able to hear it over the swearing anyway.

It would take a seriously imperceptive person to confuse Allison's profane
rants with the moderate comments by Pinkerton and Krueger.

You expect us to take seriously anything you'd say about perceiving
differences, given how confused you obviously are?

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message


It would take a seriously imperceptive person to confuse
Allison's profane rants with the moderate comments by
Pinkerton and Krueger.

I should add that there are a large number of posts under my name that
quoted subjectivists who were themselves very profane. I don't think it is
my place to change their posts when quoting them.

"Glenn Richards"

** Is this a person or a squirrel ??


Something struck me the other day whilst reading this group.


** Wot - did a big nut fall right on your pointy head ??


All these "do they/don't they" arguments about speaker cables and
interconnects...


** Crikey - you really don't have much going on up top do you - pal ??


if there is a difference then the likes of Pinkerton, Phil Allison,
Krueger etc ...


** Yawn ...... wot fabricated ****ing drivel pretending to be
some kind of a half arsed TROLL.

Best this grossly autistic compewter geek can manage, though.


And these people expect us to take one word they say seriously?


** Not me - since congenital ****wits like you are incapable of such a
feat.



Squirrel Solutions Ltd
http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/


** What' a squirrel's idea of a solution ???

Hording as many * nuts * as possible - of course.



...... Phil

In article ,
Glenn Richards wrote:
All these "do they/don't they" arguments about speaker cables and
interconnects... if there is a difference then the likes of Pinkerton,
Phil Allison, Krueger etc are so busy trying to out-Tourettes each other
that they wouldn't be able to hear it over the swearing anyway.

Eh? Mr Pinkerton doesn't post here anymore but Mr Kruger certainly does -
and I can't remember him ever using a swear word.

Allison on the other hand...

--
*If a mute swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Glenn Richards wrote:

Something struck me the other day whilst reading this group.

All these "do they/don't they" arguments about speaker cables and
interconnects... if there is a difference then the likes of Pinkerton,
Phil Allison, Krueger etc are so busy trying to out-Tourettes each other
that they wouldn't be able to hear it over the swearing anyway.

And these people expect us to take one word they say seriously?

I don't follow your 'argument'.

Electrical signals (including audio band ones) follow the laws of physics
and their behaviour is easily predicted. My belief is that certain 'cable
differences' are easily explained by those laws, rather than any audio
'voodoo'.

If so, and the PRO-audio world certainly believes so, those differences
could easily be eliminated by using 'pro' type interfaces which have now
become actually LESS expensive than 'audiophool' ones.

Graham

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

Glenn Richards wrote:
All these "do they/don't they" arguments about speaker cables and
interconnects... if there is a difference then the likes of Pinkerton,
Phil Allison, Krueger etc are so busy trying to out-Tourettes each other
that they wouldn't be able to hear it over the swearing anyway.

Eh? Mr Pinkerton doesn't post here anymore but Mr Kruger certainly does -
and I can't remember him ever using a swear word.

Allison on the other hand...

Observant comment ! ;~)

Graham

"Glenn Richards" wrote in message
...
Something struck me the other day whilst reading this group.

All these "do they/don't they" arguments about speaker cables and
interconnects... if there is a difference then the likes of Pinkerton,
Phil Allison, Krueger etc are so busy trying to out-Tourettes each other
that they wouldn't be able to hear it over the swearing anyway.

And these people expect us to take one word they say seriously?

**You should, perhaps, ask the question directly to each. You could, for
instance, ask:

Are there are any audible differences between speaker cables, under specific
conditions?

You may well be surprised at the answers. Don't assume answers, before you
hear them.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

lid wrote...
I've never noticed a speaker cable have any effect on the sound stage or
the image presented by the speakers, it only, for me at least, changes the
tonal balance.

Interconnects, for me do the opposite. I've never noticed a tonal change
but have noticed sound stage and imaging differences. I've no idea why.

I've never noticed a definite difference with either IC's or speaker
cables, but I mainly use headphones and due to circumstances have never
had the opportunity to listen for any length of time at "realistic"
volume levels on speakers.
I wondered at what sort of volume level you play for these differences
to become apparent, fairly loud I should imagine?

Okay, now rip me apart, do your worst.

I'll stand by with the first aid kit and a nice cup of tea.

--
Ken