![]() |
Headphone amplifier advice
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Eiron" wrote in message That's an impressive damping factor. I wonder how the frequency response of headphones changes when current-driven rather than voltage-driven. The impedance curves of headphones are documented on the web, and are typically pretty non-uniform. Probably why so many people like dedicated headphone amps, and drive them from low impedance, low voltage sources. Just as a FYI, this project isn't hifi. In fact, just the opposite. It is to train students in simplex radio comms protocols. A modicum of noise and a frequency response such as 300 Hz -3 kHz would be fine and simulate a radio link even better. In fact, part of the spec is to be able to inject noise onto the system :-) With regard to the headphone audio amp issue, I may just do it in discrete components. A complementary pair of gp transistors and a half dozen resistors will probably cost about tuppence :-) |
Headphone amplifier advice
Woody wrote:
A mistake that many people make with lo-Z headphones is to run an amp straight into them and then wonder why there is so much residual noise. The easiest method is to use a small power amp such as a LM386 or TDA2003, then put a resistor in series with it - something in the range 330-470R will usually suit. You will probably end up with a far more acceptable result as the amp is specifically designed to drive audio rather than just a general purpose amp. Yes, I appreciate that a proper audio amp would do the job better. But I had a spare amp section on the quad op-amp so I thought I would try to use that before looking at other options. |
Headphone amplifier advice
tony sayer wrote:
In article , TonyL scribeth thus David Looser wrote: The odds that they will be quads is about zero, since headphone drivers are typically used in pairs. Agreed. I know of no quad op-amps that will do the job. I think Tony should accept that he will need a separate h/phone amp chip. All comments noted. Thanks. The *only* problem with the LM324 in this application is the crossover distortion. It drives low-z headphones fine. So, I'll try plugging in a TL074 and see what happens before looking to a purpose designed hadphone driver. Would one of those SSM -whatever -there -called series line drivers do this quite well?.. Don't know. But if I can't use the spare section on the existing quad op-amp to drive the headphone then I may as well go for a purpose designed heaphone amp as suggested by others in here, or add a bipolar complementary pair. |
Headphone amplifier advice
In article , TonyL
scribeth thus Arny Krueger wrote: "Eiron" wrote in message That's an impressive damping factor. I wonder how the frequency response of headphones changes when current-driven rather than voltage-driven. The impedance curves of headphones are documented on the web, and are typically pretty non-uniform. Probably why so many people like dedicated headphone amps, and drive them from low impedance, low voltage sources. Just as a FYI, this project isn't hifi. In fact, just the opposite. It is to train students in simplex radio comms protocols. A modicum of noise and a frequency response such as 300 Hz -3 kHz would be fine and simulate a radio link even better. In fact, part of the spec is to be able to inject noise onto the system :-) With regard to the headphone audio amp issue, I may just do it in discrete components. A complementary pair of gp transistors and a half dozen resistors will probably cost about tuppence :-) Ah!, you should have said that.. I'm sure a few contributors could spec you something in the 300-3400 Hz area;))... -- Tony Sayer |
Headphone amplifier advice
"tony sayer" wrote in message
... In article , TonyL scribeth thus Arny Krueger wrote: "Eiron" wrote in message That's an impressive damping factor. I wonder how the frequency response of headphones changes when current-driven rather than voltage-driven. The impedance curves of headphones are documented on the web, and are typically pretty non-uniform. Probably why so many people like dedicated headphone amps, and drive them from low impedance, low voltage sources. Just as a FYI, this project isn't hifi. In fact, just the opposite. It is to train students in simplex radio comms protocols. A modicum of noise and a frequency response such as 300 Hz -3 kHz would be fine and simulate a radio link even better. In fact, part of the spec is to be able to inject noise onto the system :-) With regard to the headphone audio amp issue, I may just do it in discrete components. A complementary pair of gp transistors and a half dozen resistors will probably cost about tuppence :-) Ah!, you should have said that.. I'm sure a few contributors could spec you something in the 300-3400 Hz area;))... -- A complementary pair of transistors, as suggested, would have a bandwidth plenty wide enough for video! But the linearity would leave rather a lot to be desired, more crossover distortion than the LM324 probably. But I wonder if Tony L has read the data sheet for the LM324?, it clearly states that with an AC coupled load (I assume he has capacitively coupled his headphones?) a resistor should be connected from the output pin to ground "to avoid crossover distortion", has he done that? David. |
Headphone amplifier advice
tony sayer wrote:
Ah!, you should have said that.. I'm sure a few contributors could spec you something in the 300-3400 Hz area;))... LOL ! |
Headphone amplifier advice
David Looser wrote:
A complementary pair of transistors, as suggested, would have a bandwidth plenty wide enough for video! But the linearity would leave rather a lot to be desired, more crossover distortion than the LM324 probably. Not in class AB mode ? But I wonder if Tony L has read the data sheet for the LM324?, it clearly states that with an AC coupled load (I assume he has capacitively coupled his headphones?) a resistor should be connected from the output pin to ground "to avoid crossover distortion", has he done that? Yes, I have the data sheet. With the headphones connected the resistor had the effect of moving the crossover point up or down from the 0V level depending on whether the resistor was connected to +Vcc or -Vcc. The value of the resistor determined how far the crossover point moved. I guess the idea is to set it so that the output stage goes into Class B mode at higher signal levels so that the crossover distortion would be buried in the signal. Unfortunately, it is so bad that it is still clearly audible at all but very high levels. Moving the crossover point beyond the maximum output voltage swing removed the distortion but left me with a class A output stage, with associated high quiescent current. I'm willing to accept that this problem may be due to trying to drive a low-z load with an inappropriate device. |
Headphone amplifier advice
TonyL wrote: I want to drive low-z (32 ohm) headphones using op amps. Then you're screwed if you need any volume. Most op-amps current limit at around 30mA =~ 20mA RMS. That's 13mW. Graham |
Headphone amplifier advice
TonyL wrote: I built a prototype using a LM324 that happened to be handy. Result was gross crossover distortion The LM324 is world reknowed for that. Why not use an AUDIO op-amp ? Graham |
Headphone amplifier advice
Arny Krueger wrote: The odds that they will be quads is about zero, since headphone drivers are typically used in pairs. Very true. Graham |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk