![]() |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
Hi,
Just to let people know I've just put up a new page which looks at the effects of room acoustics and human hearing. In particular, to assess the amplifier powers people might need. For reasons that should be clear if you read it, the item is called "Imagine a Room Full of Mirrors". :-) When I get a chance I'll also put up the first two HFN articles I did on 'Speaker Cables'. Slainte, Jim -- Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... Hi, Just to let people know I've just put up a new page which looks at the effects of room acoustics and human hearing. In particular, to assess the amplifier powers people might need. For reasons that should be clear if you read it, the item is called "Imagine a Room Full of Mirrors". :-) When I get a chance I'll also put up the first two HFN articles I did on 'Speaker Cables'. Slainte, Jim Well, Jimbo - it certainly is dead in here! That's a lot of work (2,700 words?) to go without a single flicker of acknowledgement! I had a skim through (I've only got 'skim' left these days, I'm afraid) and found it very interesting; I note the comment about the varying behaviour of different room/speaker combinations, but didn't see any mention of 'hearing acuity' or even of the *clarity* of speakers used - or don't they come into it when seeking an apparent 'loudness level' of the audio system...?? ('Clarity' should spark off a nice, busy, mile-long thread here - once I slip the phrase 'fullrange driver' in somewhere! :-) |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
"Keith G" wrote in message
... "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... Hi, Just to let people know I've just put up a new page which looks at the effects of room acoustics and human hearing. In particular, to assess the amplifier powers people might need. For reasons that should be clear if you read it, the item is called "Imagine a Room Full of Mirrors". :-) When I get a chance I'll also put up the first two HFN articles I did on 'Speaker Cables'. Slainte, Jim Well, Jimbo - it certainly is dead in here! That's a lot of work (2,700 words?) to go without a single flicker of acknowledgement! I had a skim through (I've only got 'skim' left these days, I'm afraid) and found it very interesting; I note the comment about the varying behaviour of different room/speaker combinations, but didn't see any mention of 'hearing acuity' or even of the *clarity* of speakers used - or don't they come into it when seeking an apparent 'loudness level' of the audio system...?? OK, I'll bite :-) What is "clarity"? and how do you measure it? David. |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
In article ,
Keith G wrote: ('Clarity' should spark off a nice, busy, mile-long thread here - once I slip the phrase 'fullrange driver' in somewhere! :-) Just wondered how many others you had built since you last posted here? ;-) -- *If horrific means to make horrible, does terrific mean to make terrible? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
In article , Keith G
wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... Hi, Just to let people know I've just put up a new page which looks at the effects of room acoustics and human hearing. In particular, to assess the amplifier powers people might need. For reasons that should be clear if you read it, the item is called "Imagine a Room Full of Mirrors". :-) When I get a chance I'll also put up the first two HFN articles I did on 'Speaker Cables'. Slainte, Jim Well, Jimbo - it certainly is dead in here! That's a lot of work (2,700 words?) Actually, what takes most of the time is the work required to get the results shown in the diagrams! I usually 'write' articles by generating results and graphics, then flow the words to explain what I've done and what they show.... to go without a single flicker of acknowledgement! You think that's bad, you should think how dissapointing it can be when magazine articles seem to draw no comments in the form of 'letters to the editor'. Alas, the levels of feedback from readers does generally seem low unless you happen to gore their favourate animal. :-) I had a skim through (I've only got 'skim' left these days, I'm afraid) and found it very interesting; I note the comment about the varying behaviour of different room/speaker combinations, but didn't see any mention of 'hearing acuity' or even of the *clarity* of speakers used - or don't they come into it when seeking an apparent 'loudness level' of the audio system...?? All too complex. The results can be expected to vary with all kinds of details of the room acoustic and speaker behaviour. Given I only had a few kwords and 3-4 magazine pages I just wanted to get across the general idea that in small domestic rooms the perceived sound level will be increased a fair bit, so less powerful amps would be fine. This was prompted by reading reports of an 'experiment' that showed you needed kw amps - but which was done in a room the size of an assembly room. Much bigger room than most UK homes. ('Clarity' should spark off a nice, busy, mile-long thread here - once I slip the phrase 'fullrange driver' in somewhere! :-) Is the last remark from golf or biking?... :-) Slainte, Jim -- Change 'noise' to 'jcgl' if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
"David Looser" wrote in message ... "Keith G" wrote snipped to save the planet I had a skim through (I've only got 'skim' left these days, I'm afraid) and found it very interesting; I note the comment about the varying behaviour of different room/speaker combinations, but didn't see any mention of 'hearing acuity' or even of the *clarity* of speakers used - or don't they come into it when seeking an apparent 'loudness level' of the audio system...?? OK, I'll bite :-) Sure you will - there's sod-all else in here to 'eat', is there? ;-) What is "clarity"? and how do you measure it? With a knife and fork - just like how you measure the taste of a steak and kidney pudding or the scent of a rose.... Here, see what you can do with this - what's the word: 'happy as xxx'? http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/Langu...r%20Clip-1.mp3 Here it is again in *vinyl*, if you prefer: http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/Langu...r%20Clip-2.mp3 :-) |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Keith G wrote: ('Clarity' should spark off a nice, busy, mile-long thread here - once I slip the phrase 'fullrange driver' in somewhere! :-) Just wondered how many others you had built since you last posted here? ;-) Ay oop, Plowie - how're ya keeping? :-) I've built not a thing since I was last here - only revitalised my silly big Jericho cabinets with *ULTRA CLEAR* Lowther PM2Cs (I think they are) and finally ripped the innards out of an AI step-up box to make one of my phono stages an *unutterably sweet* MC stage!! Wot I had done last, if yew recall, was to push past my 'triodes and horns' to try some top of the range ('best measured to date' or somesuch) Technics solid state stuff only to find it completely unappealing (bland is a good word - not *neutral* or anything else smarty-arsed, just *bland*) and then slump back to my triodes (and KT88s and Pioneer SS and Denon SS) with great relief, since when nothing has changed other than the two small things mentioned above! I'm into 'photography' now - wanna see my Nikkors? http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/Nikkors.jpg :-) (Actually, I'm not sure if I am into 'photography' per se - there's even more ****s in that than there is in 'audio'!! ;-) |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:48:43 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote: Hi, Just to let people know I've just put up a new page which looks at the effects of room acoustics and human hearing. In particular, to assess the amplifier powers people might need. For reasons that should be clear if you read it, the item is called "Imagine a Room Full of Mirrors". :-) When I get a chance I'll also put up the first two HFN articles I did on 'Speaker Cables'. Slainte, Jim Interesting article - do you think this will extrapolate to the ultimate small room, a set of headphones? What I'm thinking about is the interaction between what you hear and what you see. I mean, if you are listening with headphones in large or small rooms, do your acoustic perceptions of what you hear change as a result? The "right" volume for me depends on a great many things, room size being one of them. Another would be the time of day, whether the neighbours are home etc. I don't really think "shame but I'd better keep the volume down", the preferred volume actually changes. So I think this probably has a great deal further to go than the simple acoustic interaction of room size and the formation of resonance. d |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
"Jim Lesurf" wrote Actually, what takes most of the time is the work required to get the results shown in the diagrams! Yes, of course. to go without a single flicker of acknowledgement! You think that's bad, you should think how dissapointing it can be when magazine articles seem to draw no comments in the form of 'letters to the editor'. Alas, the levels of feedback from readers does generally seem low unless you happen to gore their favourate animal. :-) The question is 'Who read the magazines these days? I recently sold a turntable to someone who spotted my 'World Audio Design' stuff when he came to collect it and said 'Ooh, do you read the magazine?' I said no, not any longer and was going to go on and say that I found that particular magazine had gone downhill of late and was now full of meaningless purple prose and dubious factoids, but I didn't.... Just as well, turns out he was/is the Deputy Editor of the magazine! Anyway, he said the TT was going to featire in 'Audio Classics' (or somesuch) and that he would send me a copy. He didn't ( no surprise there) but a nearby friend still takes the mag and loaned me his (March?) copy - shore 'nuff, the article was yet another wordy exercise in meaningless 'purple prose' and just about the only single 'factoid' in it (speed adjustment % figure) was *incorrect*!! ('Clarity' should spark off a nice, busy, mile-long thread here - once I slip the phrase 'fullrange driver' in somewhere! :-) Is the last remark from golf or biking?... :-) No it's a familiar contraction of something like 'a single speaker driver system that provides enough of the meaningful extremes at both ends of the spectrum to provide an adequate illusion of the full freqency range of normal music, speech and soundtracks and render unnecessary the employment of multiple drivers individually of varying FR ranges and requisite crossover circuitry, thus avoiding the inevitable, ensuant deterioration of the sound quality produced'.... OWTTE... (Google it! ;-) |
New page on room acoustics, amplifier power, etc
In article ,
Keith G wrote: ('Clarity' should spark off a nice, busy, mile-long thread here - once I slip the phrase 'fullrange driver' in somewhere! :-) Is the last remark from golf or biking?... :-) No it's a familiar contraction of something like 'a single speaker driver system that provides enough of the meaningful extremes at both ends of the spectrum to provide an adequate illusion of the full freqency range of normal music, speech and soundtracks and render unnecessary the employment of multiple drivers individually of varying FR ranges and requisite crossover circuitry, thus avoiding the inevitable, ensuant deterioration of the sound quality produced'.... The holy grail, then, since no such beast has been made. Unless the 'meaningful extremes' of your hearing is greatly reduced from the norm. -- *Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk