![]() |
When does it ever end?
In article ,
Eeyore wrote: Are you talking home recorded ones or 'factory'? Can't say I've had problems with mass produced ones - but home recorded seem to have a limited life. Although it seems to depend on make of blank. CDRs really. And I don't know if it's the make of the blank alone ( I usually use 'name' ones of some reasonably quality reputation ) or the drives pack up early. I've thrown out more CD drives than any other piece of PC kit. Is that on the burning side or reading them afterwards? Finding one reader that is universally perfect might be difficult. I recently had a PC data disc that wouldn't read on any of my PC drives - but would on an ancient Acorn one, so I managed to copy it. -- *Two wrongs are only the beginning * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
When does it ever end?
In article , Laurence Payne
wrote: On Sat, 23 May 2009 00:04:47 +0100, Eeyore wrote: CDRs really. And I don't know if it's the make of the blank alone ( I usually use 'name' ones of some reasonably quality reputation ) or the drives pack up early. I've thrown out more CD drives than any other piece of PC kit. The first generation of CD drives certainly seemed to have about a 3 year life. A lot of my failed CD-Rs date from days before I realised that burning at the manufacturer's maximum rated speed was NOT a good idea. I've often had a situation where a newly-burnt CDR would not play properly in a specific device or drive. Like the above, I have found that lowering the write speed can help. I've also found it helps to use a particular brand, TDK in my experience works well. But this does seem to vary both with choice of writer, and with the playback/reading devices. *As yet* I've not encountered any examples of a CDR that used to play fine but seems to have aged or deteriorated. Now approaching a decade for the oldest. So although I suspect problems may show up eventually, I've been OK thus far. The better burn utilities prominently feature a choice of burn speeds. Unfortunately many of the consumer-aimed programs hide this setting. I've found that some writers may also simply ignore a speed slower than they can be bothered to accept. For example, the CD writer I have in my day-to-day-use home machine won't go any slower than x4 even if the software tells it to. The DVD writer seems to totally ignore any speed instructions when used to burn a CDR, and what it produces is useless for my purposes. Fortunately, the CDR writer seems to do a decent job. Alas, this all seems a minefield in my experience as it seems impossible to predict which burner/disc brand/speed combination will give the best results in terms of how well some other specific player can then cope with the resulting discs. At one level you can just experiment. The snag is - what happens X years later when you change playing device, and the discs that played fine on old devices don't play correctly on it? So far, this has been OK in my experience, but is this just luck?... Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
When does it ever end?
On Sun, 24 May 2009 12:23:30 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote: I've found that some writers may also simply ignore a speed slower than they can be bothered to accept. For example, the CD writer I have in my day-to-day-use home machine won't go any slower than x4 even if the software tells it to. The DVD writer seems to totally ignore any speed instructions when used to burn a CDR, and what it produces is useless for my purposes. Fortunately, the CDR writer seems to do a decent job. I'm not sure it SHOULD let you go slower than 4X with the media available today. The trick is to find an optimum speed, not "slower is better". Doubtless a shop-bought computer will come with the cheapest possible burner hardware. And, of course, the fact that you have one unit that burns ONLY CDs (not DVDs) gives a clue as to its age - it's as hard (and as pointless) to buy a CD-only burner these days as it is to search out a CD-only player for your hi-fi stack :-) But you can slot in something like a Pioneer 115-D (or whatever their current model is) for so little money, it can hardly be considered a problem. |
When does it ever end?
In article , Laurence Payne
wrote: On Sun, 24 May 2009 12:23:30 +0100, Jim Lesurf wrote: I've found that some writers may also simply ignore a speed slower than they can be bothered to accept. For example, the CD writer I have in my day-to-day-use home machine won't go any slower than x4 even if the software tells it to. The DVD writer seems to totally ignore any speed instructions when used to burn a CDR, and what it produces is useless for my purposes. Fortunately, the CDR writer seems to do a decent job. I'm not sure it SHOULD let you go slower than 4X with the media available today. The trick is to find an optimum speed, not "slower is better". Whilst that may be a useful generalisation, I've tended to find that such generalisations often go awry. :-) FWIW with exactly the same batch of discs, the above writer produced less reliably readable discs than another that wrote more slowly. I agree, though, that writers that refuse to go slower may do so because they are incapable of working well at lower speeds. TBH The best CD writer I ever used was a SCSI interface Plextor. If I wrote TDK CDRs with that for CDDA at x1 or x2 speed then they played on all the audio and computer drives I could find. Can't say that for *any* writer/disk combination I've found since. Doubtless a shop-bought computer will come with the cheapest possible burner hardware. And, of course, the fact that you have one unit that burns ONLY CDs (not DVDs) gives a clue as to its age - it's as hard (and as pointless) to buy a CD-only burner these days as it is to search out a CD-only player for your hi-fi stack :-) Again, not quite my experience. I've found that a deliberately chosen CD writer can work more reliably than a later CD/DVD writer, also specially bought. However a factor in this is the point I make below... Also, the CD writer made a much better job of reading some faulty commercial CDDAs I had than the CD/DVD drive. The CD writer got better results until the point it admitted it couldn't read any more and gave up. The CD/DVD drive basically read garbage from parts of the disc and gave no sign it hadn't read correctly to the end. But you can slot in something like a Pioneer 115-D (or whatever their current model is) for so little money, it can hardly be considered a problem. Can I? erm... You may not know what machine I use for most domestic computing... Hints are that it doesn't run Windows, nor MacOS, nor Linux (usually), and doesn't have 'IBM PC' type hardware. :-) That said, I've been playing with a new linux box in recent weeks. This came with a CD/DVD writer, but I've not yet tried it for disc writing. Spent more 'drive time' installing various OS to see which I prefer. ;- Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
When does it ever end?
On Sun, 24 May 2009 17:36:58 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote: Can I? erm... You may not know what machine I use for most domestic computing... Hints are that it doesn't run Windows, nor MacOS, nor Linux (usually), and doesn't have 'IBM PC' type hardware. :-) No, I don't. Are you an enthusiast for something esoteric or something retro? But whatever it is, if it takes a CD/DVD drive at all, what can it use other than an ATA or SATA unit? |
When does it ever end?
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote: TBH The best CD writer I ever used was a SCSI interface Plextor. If I wrote TDK CDRs with that for CDDA at x1 or x2 speed then they played on all the audio and computer drives I could find. Can't say that for *any* writer/disk combination I've found since. Yes - I got one of those as part of a package that included CDBurn. At one of the RISC OS shows - Epsom, IIRC. Still in use. ;-) -- *If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
When does it ever end?
In article ,
Laurence Payne wrote: Can I? erm... You may not know what machine I use for most domestic computing... Hints are that it doesn't run Windows, nor MacOS, nor Linux (usually), and doesn't have 'IBM PC' type hardware. :-) No, I don't. Are you an enthusiast for something esoteric or something retro? But whatever it is, if it takes a CD/DVD drive at all, what can it use other than an ATA or SATA unit? The snag is suitable RISC OS drivers ain't available for every drive. And no two makes of drive seem to be identical. -- *Growing old is inevitable, growing up is optional Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
When does it ever end?
On Mon, 25 May 2009 10:11:27 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: No, I don't. Are you an enthusiast for something esoteric or something retro? But whatever it is, if it takes a CD/DVD drive at all, what can it use other than an ATA or SATA unit? The snag is suitable RISC OS drivers ain't available for every drive. And no two makes of drive seem to be identical. What's he on then? An old Archimedes? Can't argue with religion I suppose :-) |
When does it ever end?
In article ,
Laurence Payne wrote: On Mon, 25 May 2009 10:11:27 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: No, I don't. Are you an enthusiast for something esoteric or something retro? But whatever it is, if it takes a CD/DVD drive at all, what can it use other than an ATA or SATA unit? The snag is suitable RISC OS drivers ain't available for every drive. And no two makes of drive seem to be identical. What's he on then? An old Archimedes? Can't argue with religion I suppose :-) Think Jim uses an Iyonix. Newer and more powerful than this machine. ;-) They can do all the common tasks like handling news and email, simple browsing, word processing etc just fine. Things that need a deal of number crunching like video, not. But ok for audio. But I have a PC for tasks it can't handle so well. The beauty of using a non standard OS is there's no need for sophisticated firewalls and anti virus etc systems which cause so much grief on a PC. -- *If horrific means to make horrible, does terrific mean to make terrible? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
When does it ever end?
In article , Laurence Payne
wrote: On Sun, 24 May 2009 17:36:58 +0100, Jim Lesurf wrote: Can I? erm... You may not know what machine I use for most domestic computing... Hints are that it doesn't run Windows, nor MacOS, nor Linux (usually), and doesn't have 'IBM PC' type hardware. :-) No, I don't. Are you an enthusiast for something esoteric or something retro? Call that either way you like. :-) For most of my day-to-day computing I use RISC OS on an Iyonix. I simply find it easier and more convenient for the tasks I do, in general. But whatever it is, if it takes a CD/DVD drive at all, what can it use other than an ATA or SATA unit? The problem is that most units need specific driver details. Alas, in general the info isn't available. So a few have been determined to be workable, but most others, not. Ditto for a range of other types of device. Afraid accessibility of hardware where the makers only talk to MicroSoft or Apple about the workings can be difficult at times. Fortunately, enough of us have got enough items working for this not to be a shutout. But t'aint as simple as with Windows. The situation is similar to linux where some hardware doesn't work as it does with Windows as the makers won't release the driving details and no-one has (yet) worked them out to do an open driver. The good news is that the number of programmers using linux is higher, so they can fling more effort into sorting such problems. Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk