![]() |
Basic preamps wanted
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:45:22 +0100, "TonyL"
wrote: Suggestion...find out what your customer really wants. For example.... I do know *exactly* what the customer wants, which is to eliminate low- and high-frequency machinery noise from an operator's microphone. I have ordered the FBQ8000 which are probably overkill but are guaranteed to do the job and are much cheaper than I would charge for my time in building something suitable. Thanks to everyone for their help. |
Basic preamps wanted
"JohnTurd" Suggestion...find out what your customer really wants. For example.... I do know *exactly* what the customer wants, which is to eliminate low- and high-frequency machinery noise from an operator's microphone. ** ********. The machine noise that is interfering with speech intelligibility is in the same band as the voice - filtering will not help. Have neither of you DICKHEADS ever noticed how easily a phone conversation is affected by ambient noise? I have ordered the FBQ8000 which are probably overkill ** Total waste of money. There IS one born every minute... . ...... Phil |
Basic preamps wanted
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:41:08 +1000, "Phil Allison"
wrote: "JohnTurd" Suggestion...find out what your customer really wants. For example.... I do know *exactly* what the customer wants, which is to eliminate low- and high-frequency machinery noise from an operator's microphone. ** ********. The machine noise that is interfering with speech intelligibility is in the same band as the voice - filtering will not help. Have neither of you DICKHEADS ever noticed how easily a phone conversation is affected by ambient noise? I have ordered the FBQ8000 which are probably overkill ** Total waste of money. There IS one born every minute... . ..... Phil Have you tried engaging your diseased brain before opening your stinking cess-pit of a mouth? As it happens, I have done a full spectrum analysis of the audio from that microphone. The worst components are between 100 - 250 Hz, and these peak at 6dB above the voice. Then there are a range of components between 1 - 10 kHz which are all about the same peak level as the voice. Also the existing system is a bit low on gain. By putting in suitable filtering I can remove all of the heavy noise below the voice band and remove the rubbish above it. Yes, the in-band components will remain, but I have done a number of tests using recordings of the audio with a graphic equaliser on a PC, and careful filtering *greatly* increases readability - the customer was most impressed. I cannot get access to the mic, which is built into an equipment panel. The customer cannot accept machine downtime to facilitate a rebuild, so I can only play with the audio further down the line. This is my last comment on the matter, so now you can F**K OFF and get the serious medical treatment that you so urgently need. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk