"Laurence Payne"

Glenn - maybe you haven't been around here long enough to have met
Phil. He delights in disagreeing with almost everything and becomes
abusive when challenged.

You'll see from his response to this which one of us has credibility.

A little Googling (eg. the manufacturer's web site) will show how
often the NT-1 is recommended for recording vocals.


** See below where I point out the " maker " is someone who has not got a
clue about microphones.

So you and he have a lot in common.


....... Phil


** I am particularly familiar with that mic and know
personally the folk who make it - ie the Freedmans
of Sydney, Australia.

The Freedmans made their name as the importers of
"Dynacord" valve PA gear into this country in the 1960s.

A name that will live on in infamy ...

Peter Freedman (son of Henry) is the proprietor of " Rode " mics
- a silly German sounding name he made up to HIDE the
Chinese origin of the mic capsules and other parts that
are used to make the thing.

In NO WAY SHAPE or FORM is the NT-1 a vocal mic !!!!

Using it for that purpose will very soon RUIN it !!

BTW:

The Rode NT-1 has a nick - which is suggestive of a rat.



..... Phil

"Laurence Payne"
"TonyL"

As recommended by someone in here, I've just bought a pair of these:
http://www.dolphinmusic.co.uk/produc...ched-pair.html
Haven't used them in anger yet, but they sound great in tests. Your
pre-amp
does have 48V phantom ?

Have you tried them on vocals? This isn't one of Behringer's
recommended applications for this model.


** Probably because of the same problem the NT-1 has.



...... Phil

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:27:10 +1000, "Phil Allison"
wrote:


"Laurence Payne in the Arse "


I find the Rode NT-1 a useful workhorse.
http://www.dv247.com/invt/10229/


** I am particularly familiar with that mic and know
personally the folk who make it - ie the Freedmans
of Sydney, Australia.

The Freedmans made their name as the importers of
"Dynacord" valve PA gear into this country in the 1960s.

A name that will live on in infamy ...

Peter Freedman (son of Henry) is the proprietor of " Rode " mics
- a silly German sounding name he made up to HIDE the
Chinese origin of the mic capsules and other parts that
are used to make the thing.

In NO WAY SHAPE or FORM is the NT-1 a vocal mic !!!!

Using it for that purpose will very soon RUIN it !!

BTW:

The Rode NT-1 has a nick - which is suggestive of a rat.




..... Phil




The capsule of the NT1-A (unlike that of the NT1) is entirely
Australian made. As for vocals - well you would not use it for stage
work with your mouth buried in it, but from six inches away behind a
pop shield (as you would use it in a studio), it is an exceedingly
good vocal mic.

How the company started out is a matter of neither interest nor
importance. What matters is right now they are manufacturing the state
of the art.

d

"Don Pearce Congenital LIAR"

The capsule of the NT1-A (unlike that of the NT1) is entirely
Australian made.


** Oh really ??????

And you know that how ?????


As for vocals - well you would not use it for stage
work with your mouth buried in it, but from six inches away behind a
pop shield (as you would use it in a studio), it is an exceedingly
good vocal mic.


** So it is a fragile, studio condenser mic - with all that implies.

And all if it unknown to the OP.


** I am particularly familiar with that mic and know
personally the folk who make it - ie the Freedmans
of Sydney, Australia.

How the company started out is a matter of neither interest nor
importance.


** That is a WRONG opinion you get to keep.


What matters is right now they are manufacturing the state
of the art.


** Yawnnnnnnnnn...

There is lot more "fart" than "art" in any Rode mic.



..... Phil

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in
message
In article ,
Phil Allison wrote:
In NO WAY SHAPE or FORM is the NT-1 a vocal mic
!!!!

Pray tell what determines a vocal mic, oh potty mouthed
one?

Vocal mics are usually fairly narrow cardioids, supercardioids or
hypercardiods, balanced for close working and have a built-in pop filter.

I've used one of my NT-1as for a vocal mic with an external pop filter and
appropriate filtering. Because I had to add so much stuff to make it
effective, I would not call it a vocal mic. I would call it an all-purpose
mic.

I have also used another general-purpose mic, a MXL 603s as a vocal mic with
an extenal pop filter. The external pop filter was not effective enough at
avoiding contamination of the diaphragm, and after a few years of regular
service it developed a number of problems that my attempt to simply clean
the built-up gunk off the diaphragm did not fully alleviate.

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:00:37 +1000, "Phil Allison"
wrote:


"Don Pearce Congenital LIAR"

The capsule of the NT1-A (unlike that of the NT1) is entirely
Australian made.


** Oh really ??????

And you know that how ?????


I've been told by a source I believe rather more than I do you.


As for vocals - well you would not use it for stage
work with your mouth buried in it, but from six inches away behind a
pop shield (as you would use it in a studio), it is an exceedingly
good vocal mic.


** So it is a fragile, studio condenser mic - with all that implies.


That's right. What do you imagine vocalists use in studios? Have you
ever been in a studio? Have you even seen a picture? Vocalists use
(99% of the time) a large diaphragm condensor coupled with a pop
filter.


** I am particularly familiar with that mic and know
personally the folk who make it - ie the Freedmans
of Sydney, Australia.

How the company started out is a matter of neither interest nor
importance.


** That is a WRONG opinion you get to keep.

Thank you for your kind permission.

d

"Don Pearce Congenital LIAR"

The capsule of the NT1-A (unlike that of the NT1) is entirely
Australian made.


** Oh really ??????

And you know that how ?????


I've been told by a source I believe rather more than I do you.


** Fraid you have been listening to the pixies then - ****wit.

Lying pommy pixies living inside your pointy head.



As for vocals - well you would not use it for stage
work with your mouth buried in it, but from six inches away behind a
pop shield (as you would use it in a studio), it is an exceedingly
good vocal mic.


** So it is a fragile, studio condenser mic - with all that implies.


That's right.


** Fraid you have no idea just how much it implies with mics like the
Rodent.



...... Phil

"Arny Krueger"

Vocal mics are usually fairly narrow cardioids, supercardioids or
hypercardiods, balanced for close working and have a built-in pop filter.

I've used one of my NT-1as for a vocal mic with an external pop filter and
appropriate filtering. Because I had to add so much stuff to make it
effective, I would not call it a vocal mic. I would call it an all-purpose
mic.


** A " vocal mic " is a special purpose mic that, among other qualities,
must be immune to the damaging effects of moist, human breath.


I have also used another general-purpose mic, a MXL 603s as a vocal mic
with an extenal pop filter. The external pop filter was not effective
enough at avoiding contamination of the diaphragm, and after a few years
of regular service it developed a number of problems that my attempt to
simply clean the built-up gunk off the diaphragm did not fully alleviate.

** Same goes for the Rodent and any condenser mic with a similar design
diaphragm.



..... Phil

In article ,
Phil Allison wrote:

"Dave Plowman (Nutcase)"

Phil Allison wrote:

In NO WAY SHAPE or FORM is the NT-1 a vocal mic !!!!

Pray tell what determines a vocal mic,


** Try reading the stuff you sniped - ****HEAD.

There's no information to back up your claim in it...


Despite many many years in the industry ...


** What industry is that ?

One which uses high quality microphones.

Is being a know nothing bull**** artist now a recognised form of
employment in the UK ?

I suppose it's too much to hope you'd just answer the question asked?
Like what in your opinion makes a vocal mic?



You posted this recently:

" Don't work in the 'recording industry', pet."

You think only the recording industry uses high quality mics? Has TV and
radio not reached Oz yet?

--
*If at first you don't succeed, try management *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article 4a6dda65.53789203@localhost,
Don Pearce wrote:
The capsule of the NT1-A (unlike that of the NT1) is entirely
Australian made. As for vocals - well you would not use it for stage
work with your mouth buried in it, but from six inches away behind a
pop shield (as you would use it in a studio), it is an exceedingly
good vocal mic.

Indeed. Our Phil seems to think mics are only used on gigs.

--
*One of us is thinking about sex... OK, it's me.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.