![]() |
State of Quad?
Does anyone have any first hand information on the state of things
with Quad these days? I’ve been a devotee of Quad ESL for many years, initially with the one now known as the ESL57, and for the last 20 years with the ESL63. I’ve found them enormously satisfying over the years, and never felt the need to use anything else for my main system. However, having had a sequence of failed elements (the usual culprits of unglued stators or fractured diaphragms) which were expensive to have replaced, I’m wondering the current owners are doing justice to their legendary inheritance. I was hoping that there might be a sorting out of some of the production engineering weaknesses (e.g. the duff glue) but I now wonder if that was a false hope. A sign such as the web site being variously broken and apparently not maintained is not encouraging. It continues to say that the 2905 has eight elements and the 2805 has six, whereas my understanding is that it’s 6 and 4 respectively. I’ve got two ESL63s here with element faults less than three years since they were serviced. I’m just wondering if it’s time to look elsewhere for audio nirvana. Any encouraging news gratefully received. Cheers |
State of Quad?
"Justin" Does anyone have any first hand information on the state of things with Quad these days? ** Everything has moved to China. The Chang brothers from Taiwan bought the company. I’ve been a devotee of Quad ESL for many years, initially with the one now known as the ESL57, and for the last 20 years with the ESL63. I’ve found them enormously satisfying over the years, and never felt the need to use anything else for my main system. ** Most Quad owners are never likely to change brand. However, having had a sequence of failed elements (the usual culprits of unglued stators or fractured diaphragms) which were expensive to have replaced, I’m wondering the current owners are doing justice to their legendary inheritance. ** By all accounts, the new Quad gear is first class. I’ve got two ESL63s here with element faults less than three years since they were serviced. ** The new panels have not failed - have they ? At 20+ years of age, ALL the panels in an ESL63 need to be replaced - if they have not all failed already, they sure as hell will when you transport them. It is also advisable to replace the EHT stack PCB too - still a far cheaper option than buying a new pair of 2805s etc. Also, have a GOOD look at this site in Germany - they sell refurbished panels, EHT boards and whole speakers too. http://www.quad-musik.com/html/products.html I can recommend their stuff and service. ...... Phil |
State of Quad?
On Aug 10, 2:36*am, "Phil Allison" wrote:
"Justin" Does anyone have any first hand information on the state of things with Quad these days? ** Everything has moved to China. The Chang brothers from Taiwan bought the company. I’ve been a devotee of Quad ESL for many years, initially with the one now known as the ESL57, and for the last 20 years with the ESL63. I’ve found them enormously satisfying over the years, and never felt the need to use anything else for my main system. ** Most Quad owners are never likely to change brand. However, having had a sequence of failed elements (the usual culprits of unglued stators or fractured diaphragms) which were expensive to have replaced, I’m wondering the current owners are doing justice to their legendary inheritance. ** By all accounts, the new Quad gear is first class. I’ve got two ESL63s here with element faults less than three years since they were serviced. ** The new panels have not failed - *have they ? At 20+ *years of age, *ALL *the panels in an ESL63 need to be replaced *- if they have not all failed already, they sure as hell will when you transport them. It is also advisable to replace the EHT stack PCB too *- still a far cheaper option than buying a new pair of 2805s etc. Also, have a *GOOD *look at this site in Germany *- *they sell refurbished panels, EHT boards and whole speakers too. http://www.quad-musik.com/html/products.html I can recommend their stuff and service. ..... * Phil Thanks for the replies, Phil. I think I may well go the Quad Musikwiedergabe route for spare panels. Their website gives a good impression. It’s a bit galling to discover that Quad themselves charge more for a replacement panel as a spare than if you ship the speaker to Huntingdon for them to repair. I actually have two pairs of ESL63, one pair I bought new in late ’89 and a late model pair I bought second-hand in 2000 as an alternative to having the original ones repaired (they were suffering un-glued stators). In November 2006 I had both sets repaired by Quad at Huntingdon, for a cost of £1996. That was for 12 elements, all 8 in the original set and four in the newer set. It’s this newer set that are now faulty, and the trouble is I can’t tell which elements were replaced in ’06. It is probably reasonable to assume they were not the ones that have now gone down. What I’d really like to know is, what’s the lifetime of the current, made-in China parts? I’m fairly sure that my 12 new elements were from China. There’s been a steady trickle of new 2905/2805 on eBay at around half list price, which is a bit worrying in itself. |
State of Quad?
"Justin" wrote in message ... On Aug 10, 2:36 am, "Phil Allison" wrote: "Justin" Does anyone have any first hand information on the state of things with Quad these days? ** Everything has moved to China. The Chang brothers from Taiwan bought the company. I’ve been a devotee of Quad ESL for many years, initially with the one now known as the ESL57, and for the last 20 years with the ESL63. I’ve found them enormously satisfying over the years, and never felt the need to use anything else for my main system. ** Most Quad owners are never likely to change brand. However, having had a sequence of failed elements (the usual culprits of unglued stators or fractured diaphragms) which were expensive to have replaced, I’m wondering the current owners are doing justice to their legendary inheritance. ** By all accounts, the new Quad gear is first class. I’ve got two ESL63s here with element faults less than three years since they were serviced. ** The new panels have not failed - have they ? At 20+ years of age, ALL the panels in an ESL63 need to be replaced - if they have not all failed already, they sure as hell will when you transport them. It is also advisable to replace the EHT stack PCB too - still a far cheaper option than buying a new pair of 2805s etc. Also, have a GOOD look at this site in Germany - they sell refurbished panels, EHT boards and whole speakers too. http://www.quad-musik.com/html/products.html I can recommend their stuff and service. ..... Phil Thanks for the replies, Phil. I think I may well go the Quad Musikwiedergabe route for spare panels. Their website gives a good impression. It’s a bit galling to discover that Quad themselves charge more for a replacement panel as a spare than if you ship the speaker to Huntingdon for them to repair. I actually have two pairs of ESL63, one pair I bought new in late ’89 and a late model pair I bought second-hand in 2000 as an alternative to having the original ones repaired (they were suffering un-glued stators). In November 2006 I had both sets repaired by Quad at Huntingdon, for a cost of £1996. That was for 12 elements, all 8 in the original set and four in the newer set. It’s this newer set that are now faulty, and the trouble is I can’t tell which elements were replaced in ’06. It is probably reasonable to assume they were not the ones that have now gone down. What I’d really like to know is, what’s the lifetime of the current, made-in China parts? I’m fairly sure that my 12 new elements were from China. There’s been a steady trickle of new 2905/2805 on eBay at around half list price, which is a bit worrying in itself. Yes, that always a bother - especially when you see stuff like your own going for next to nothing!! Not sure I'd be happy chucking heaps of money at a pair of speakers every 3 years myself, but it might be worth you speaking to Paul at Classique Sounds: http://www.classiquesounds.co.uk/ |
State of Quad?
"Justin" "Phil Allison" "Justin" What I’d really like to know is, what’s the lifetime of the current, made-in China parts? I’m fairly sure that my 12 new elements were from China. ** Even if they are not one bit better than the what Quad manufactured over 20 years ago - they will still last 20 years or more. Is that NOT long enough for YOU ???? There’s been a steady trickle of new 2905/2805 on eBay at around half list price, which is a bit worrying in itself. ** Heard that same, silly false argument waaaay back in 1984, when CD players were turning up in the second hand pages for lowish prices - it was quoted as proof that CD was no good. Actual fact was, the number turning up like that was about 0.1% of the number being sold through retail stores AND many of them were brand new machines - having been purchased in Asia by tourists and airline personnel in order to make a few quick dollars when they returned home. ..... Phil |
State of Quad?
Keith G wrote:
"Justin" wrote in message ... On Aug 10, 2:36 am, "Phil Allison" wrote: "Justin" Does anyone have any first hand information on the state of things with Quad these days? ** Everything has moved to China. The Chang brothers from Taiwan bought the company. I’ve been a devotee of Quad ESL for many years, initially with the one now known as the ESL57, and for the last 20 years with the ESL63. I’ve found them enormously satisfying over the years, and never felt the need to use anything else for my main system. ** Most Quad owners are never likely to change brand. However, having had a sequence of failed elements (the usual culprits of unglued stators or fractured diaphragms) which were expensive to have replaced, I’m wondering the current owners are doing justice to their legendary inheritance. ** By all accounts, the new Quad gear is first class. I’ve got two ESL63s here with element faults less than three years since they were serviced. ** The new panels have not failed - have they ? At 20+ years of age, ALL the panels in an ESL63 need to be replaced - if they have not all failed already, they sure as hell will when you transport them. It is also advisable to replace the EHT stack PCB too - still a far cheaper option than buying a new pair of 2805s etc. Also, have a GOOD look at this site in Germany - they sell refurbished panels, EHT boards and whole speakers too. http://www.quad-musik.com/html/products.html I can recommend their stuff and service. ..... Phil Thanks for the replies, Phil. I think I may well go the Quad Musikwiedergabe route for spare panels. Their website gives a good impression. It’s a bit galling to discover that Quad themselves charge more for a replacement panel as a spare than if you ship the speaker to Huntingdon for them to repair. I actually have two pairs of ESL63, one pair I bought new in late ’89 and a late model pair I bought second-hand in 2000 as an alternative to having the original ones repaired (they were suffering un-glued stators). In November 2006 I had both sets repaired by Quad at Huntingdon, for a cost of £1996. That was for 12 elements, all 8 in the original set and four in the newer set. It’s this newer set that are now faulty, and the trouble is I can’t tell which elements were replaced in ’06. It is probably reasonable to assume they were not the ones that have now gone down. What I’d really like to know is, what’s the lifetime of the current, made-in China parts? I’m fairly sure that my 12 new elements were from China. There’s been a steady trickle of new 2905/2805 on eBay at around half list price, which is a bit worrying in itself. Yes, that always a bother - especially when you see stuff like your own going for next to nothing!! A few ex-demo new models from Hifi Trading right now - about 60% list. I think they're too much of a niche product to attract much beyond curiosity, although second hand prices aren't that far removed from any other hifi. Valve kit excepted, obviously :-) Not sure I'd be happy chucking heaps of money at a pair of speakers every 3 years myself, but it might be worth you speaking to Paul at Classique Sounds: http://www.classiquesounds.co.uk/ I've had a pair (Chinese) for a year or two with no problem - but it's good to know there's support from the independents. Rob |
State of Quad?
In article
, Justin wrote: I actually have two pairs of ESL63, one pair I bought new in late 89 and a late model pair I bought second-hand in 2000 as an alternative to having the original ones repaired (they were suffering un-glued stators). I only have one pair of ESL63. Bought these in 1984. Never had any repair or service. So far as I can tell by listening and masurements they are still fine. So I don't know if your different experience is due to a change in the way they were made, or by how you/I use them, or simply 'luck'. I also have a pair of 989s, bought about 5 years ago. Up to now these have been fine. But I'd agree that is a much shorter timescale than the above one of 25 years. Theres been a steady trickle of new 2905/2805 on eBay at around half list price, which is a bit worrying in itself. Not necessarily. Some people may find that when they try ESLs they don't like them for some reason. Perhaps because they sound different to the cone-and-box sound the expect as associate with 'hifi'. Or they can't be played as loud for something like bass-heavy rock music. Or that they simply don't work well in the chosen room. Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk