![]() |
hd radio
So, after asking a simple question in the tv group, I thought i'd ask here,
why did we go dab, and what of DRM and HD Radio, any chance of these coming to us? Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ |
hd radio
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
om... So, after asking a simple question in the tv group, I thought i'd ask here, why did we go dab, and what of DRM and HD Radio, any chance of these coming to us? I thought "DRM" stood for "Digital Rights Management". What has that to do with radio? And I've never heard of "HD" radio, the term is essentially meaningless, it sounds like someone trying to jump on the HDTV bandwagon. Why did we go DAB? Well "DAB" simply stands for "Digital Audio Broadcasting" so the term applies to *any* form of digital "radio". Why did we go for the system we have? At the time it was adopted it was felt to be a good compromise between quality and cost that's why. David. |
hd radio
"David Looser" wrote in message ... "Brian Gaff" wrote in message om... So, after asking a simple question in the tv group, I thought i'd ask here, why did we go dab, and what of DRM and HD Radio, any chance of these coming to us? I thought "DRM" stood for "Digital Rights Management". What has that to do with radio? And I've never heard of "HD" radio, the term is essentially meaningless, it sounds like someone trying to jump on the HDTV bandwagon. Why did we go DAB? Well "DAB" simply stands for "Digital Audio Broadcasting" so the term applies to *any* form of digital "radio". Why did we go for the system we have? At the time it was adopted it was felt to be a good compromise between quality and cost that's why. David. DRM is Digital Radio Mondial, it is a low bit-rate digital radio that can use short and medium-wave AM transmitters, and using AAC+ compression, is capable of quite decent results, if not up to FM standards. It is being promoted as a replacement for short-wave AM in those countries (like Indonesia) which need a long-range radio medium of better quality than short-wave. There have been suggestions that Europe could adopt DRM for AM, but I've heard no more about his in recent times. HD radio is an American digital radio system, roughly comparable to our DAB, but as I understand it use as a more modern form of compression than the MP2 of DAB, but at no greater bit rates than we're using, but which nevertheless should therefore manage better quality. S. http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
hd radio
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:32:51 GMT, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: So, after asking a simple question in the tv group, I thought i'd ask here, why did we go dab, and what of DRM and HD Radio, any chance of these coming to us? Do you see a need for DRM? Why? I can't see HD Radio being introduced as it's so similar in performance to DAB. |
hd radio
The clever bit about hd radio is that it can be used on the same
transmission as fm at the same time. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Serge Auckland" wrote in message ... "David Looser" wrote in message ... "Brian Gaff" wrote in message om... So, after asking a simple question in the tv group, I thought i'd ask here, why did we go dab, and what of DRM and HD Radio, any chance of these coming to us? I thought "DRM" stood for "Digital Rights Management". What has that to do with radio? And I've never heard of "HD" radio, the term is essentially meaningless, it sounds like someone trying to jump on the HDTV bandwagon. Why did we go DAB? Well "DAB" simply stands for "Digital Audio Broadcasting" so the term applies to *any* form of digital "radio". Why did we go for the system we have? At the time it was adopted it was felt to be a good compromise between quality and cost that's why. David. DRM is Digital Radio Mondial, it is a low bit-rate digital radio that can use short and medium-wave AM transmitters, and using AAC+ compression, is capable of quite decent results, if not up to FM standards. It is being promoted as a replacement for short-wave AM in those countries (like Indonesia) which need a long-range radio medium of better quality than short-wave. There have been suggestions that Europe could adopt DRM for AM, but I've heard no more about his in recent times. HD radio is an American digital radio system, roughly comparable to our DAB, but as I understand it use as a more modern form of compression than the MP2 of DAB, but at no greater bit rates than we're using, but which nevertheless should therefore manage better quality. S. http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
hd radio
"David Looser" wrote in message
... "Brian Gaff" wrote in message om... So, after asking a simple question in the tv group, I thought i'd ask here, why did we go dab, and what of DRM and HD Radio, any chance of these coming to us? I thought "DRM" stood for "Digital Rights Management". What has that to do with radio? And I've never heard of "HD" radio, the term is essentially meaningless, it sounds like someone trying to jump on the HDTV bandwagon. Why did we go DAB? Well "DAB" simply stands for "Digital Audio Broadcasting" so the term applies to *any* form of digital "radio". Why did we go for the system we have? At the time it was adopted it was felt to be a good compromise between quality and cost that's why. Rubbish. The engineers thought the broadcasters would use the high bit rate levels needed to provide high audio quality, but they completely ignore the cost aspects, because DAB is extraordinarily expensive to transmit, which is one of the main reasons why such low bit rates are used in the UK. -- Steve - www.savefm.org - stop the BBC bullies switching off FM www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info "It is the sheer volume of online audio content available via internet-connected devices which terrifies the UK radio industry. I believe that broadband-delivered radio will explode in the years to come, offering very local, unregulated content, as well as opening a window to the radio stations of the world." - from the Myers Report |
hd radio
"DAB sounds worse than FM" wrote
Rubbish. The engineers thought the broadcasters would use the high bit rate levels needed to provide high audio quality, but they completely ignore the cost aspects, because DAB is extraordinarily expensive to transmit, which is one of the main reasons why such low bit rates are used in the UK. "Rubbish" yourself! It's only "extraordinarily expensive to transmit" because Arquiva has an effective monopoly on transmission, so it makes bugger-all difference what system is used, and indeed whether it's digital or analogue, to these high costs of transmission. David. |
hd radio
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message
... HD radio is an American digital radio system, roughly comparable to our DAB, I would personally describe them as being very different systems, but I suppose it depends on what you mean by "roughly comparable to our DAB". They both use OFDM for their transmission scheme, but other than that they're very different. but as I understand it use as a more modern form of compression than the MP2 of DAB, but at no greater bit rates than we're using, but which nevertheless should therefore manage better quality. HD Radio uses a codec that is similar to AAC+, so they could use far lower bit rates than we use with MP2 and still deliver higher audio quality (40 kbps AAC+ provides the same level of audio quality as 128 kbps MP2 according to blind listening tests). -- Steve - www.savefm.org - stop the BBC bullies switching off FM www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info "It is the sheer volume of online audio content available via internet-connected devices which terrifies the UK radio industry. I believe that broadband-delivered radio will explode in the years to come, offering very local, unregulated content, as well as opening a window to the radio stations of the world." - from the Myers Report |
hd radio
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
... On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:32:51 GMT, "Brian Gaff" wrote: So, after asking a simple question in the tv group, I thought i'd ask here, why did we go dab, and what of DRM and HD Radio, any chance of these coming to us? Do you see a need for DRM? Why? I can't see HD Radio being introduced as it's so similar in performance to DAB. HD Radio is actually far more efficient than DAB. It won't be introduced in the UK though because teh broadcasters only want to use DAB. -- Steve - www.savefm.org - stop the BBC bullies switching off FM www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info "It is the sheer volume of online audio content available via internet-connected devices which terrifies the UK radio industry. I believe that broadband-delivered radio will explode in the years to come, offering very local, unregulated content, as well as opening a window to the radio stations of the world." - from the Myers Report |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk