Is this too mellow?
 

"Iain Churches" wrote in message news:...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Audix" wrote in message

On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:01:02 +0000, Keith G
wrote:

Anyway, here's the original again:

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/GeorgiaM.mp3


And here's Arny's suggestion (EQ is not *my* work):

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/GeorgiaMEQ.mp3


The EQ'd version sounds awful to me. Excessive HF lift to
the point that it becomes annoying - completely destroys
the musical cohesiveness and tonality of the piece.

Probably due to Iain's bungled attempt at implementing my suggestion
using
less sophisticated resources.

Less sophidticated? LOL.:-)
You would wet yout pants if you saw the facility in which it was done -
and strictly to your instructions. But if your instructions were erronious
you can easily post a correct version.

Is this too mellow?
 

"Iain Churches" wrote in message

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
news:...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Audix" wrote in message

On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:01:02 +0000, Keith G
wrote:

Anyway, here's the original again:

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/GeorgiaM.mp3


And here's Arny's suggestion (EQ is not *my* work):

http://www.moirac.adsl24.co.uk/showntell/GeorgiaMEQ.mp3


The EQ'd version sounds awful to me. Excessive HF lift
to the point that it becomes annoying - completely
destroys the musical cohesiveness and tonality of the
piece.

Probably due to Iain's bungled attempt at implementing
my suggestion using
less sophisticated resources.

Less sophidticated? LOL.:-)

Iain, you have already proven to me that you lack the experience, education,
and orientation that it takes to judge the potential of production
facilities. Show you a big-name console and it is you who bows and scrapes,
regardless of its applicability to the situation.

You would wet yout pants if you saw the facility in which
it was done

I doubt it.

- and strictly to your instructions.

So far you have not documented even the possiblity that the equipment you
say was used (probably by an associate since you are unlikely to even know
how to turn the equipment on) could be used to duplicate what I recommended.

I studied the online doc of the equipment you specified and couldn't find
what I consider to be an adequate equalization facility to do more than
roughly approximate my instructions.

But if your instructions were erronious you can easily post a
correct version.

In the current context, that would be complete and total folly - the
proverbial casting of pearls (admittedly not so wonderful pearls) before
swine.