Just a reminder - body life aspects of worship:


1. Prophesy one to another for mutual edification (1 Cor. 14:3; 24)

2. Sing together hymns, psalms and spiritual songs. (Eph 5:19)

3. Read, teach and apply the Holy Scriptures together. (1 Tim
4:13).

4. Celebrate the Lord's Table together. (Acts 20:7)

5. Pray for one another, for authorities, for enemies and for the
sick. (Matt 5:44, Mark 12:17, James 5:14)

6. Praise God together. (Eph. 1: 6, 12, 14)

7. Give to meet each other's needs and to support workers. (2 Cor
8:2-3)

8. Baptise new believers and receive them into the fellowship.
(Acts 2:41)

9. Feed and serve the poor and needy together. (1 John 3:15-18)

10. Train and send 'apostles' and hear their reports. (Acts 13: 1-3;
14:26-27)


http://mentorandmultiply.homestead.c...ng_worship.htm

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

Just a reminder - body life aspects of worship:

This post is an email that went awry - it was supposed to be private email.
Sorry

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

Just a reminder - body life aspects of worship:

This post is an email that went awry - it was supposed to be private
email. Sorry

**Apology accepted. Few of us here bother with a dodgy, policially censored,
2,000 year old book. Gobbledegook is for the morons, not those of us who
actually think.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:12:20 +1000, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

Just a reminder - body life aspects of worship:

This post is an email that went awry - it was supposed to be private
email. Sorry

**Apology accepted. Few of us here bother with a dodgy, policially censored,
2,000 year old book. Gobbledegook is for the morons, not those of us who
actually think.

You can see where Arnie's "I know the Truth, I will instruct you in
it" attitude comes from :-)

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:12:20 +1000, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

Just a reminder - body life aspects of worship:

This post is an email that went awry - it was supposed
to be private email. Sorry

**Apology accepted.

So far so good.

Then the self-righteousness started spilling out:

Few of us here bother with a dodgy,
policially censored, 2,000 year old book. Gobbledegook
is for the morons, not those of us who actually think.

You can see where Arnie's "I know the Truth, I will
instruct you in it" attitude comes from :-)

I picked it up from certain people who have exactly the same attitude about
their perceptions of the world's absence of need for spiritual interests.
;-)

Arny Krueger wrote:

This post is an email that went awry - it was supposed
to be private email. Sorry

**Apology accepted.

So far so good.

Then the self-righteousness started spilling out:

It's not the self-righteousness that I find pathetic, Arny,
but the paucity of its rationale.

Few of us here bother with a dodgy,
policially censored, 2,000 year old book. Gobbledegook
is for the morons, not those of us who actually think.

Bare facts aren't worth thinking about, surely? The only
worthwhile thought is one that starts with gobbledegook, and
ends with enlightenment.

You can see where Arnie's "I know the Truth, I will
instruct you in it" attitude comes from :-)

I picked it up from certain people who have exactly the
same attitude about their perceptions of the world's
absence of need for spiritual interests. ;-)

Ah! Another opportunity for:

http://www.ivesonaudio.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/hegel.htm

Ian

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:12:20 +1000, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

Just a reminder - body life aspects of worship:

This post is an email that went awry - it was supposed to be private
email. Sorry

**Apology accepted. Few of us here bother with a dodgy, policially
censored,
2,000 year old book. Gobbledegook is for the morons, not those of us who
actually think.

You can see where Arnie's "I know the Truth, I will instruct you in
it" attitude comes from :-)

**Poor ******* must be in constant conflict. He *claims* to hold himself to
scientific principles, yet maintains that the supernatural is a normal part
of life. He is, of course, like all religious nutters, seriously deluded.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Trevor Wilson wrote:

**Apology accepted. Few of us here bother with a dodgy,
policially censored,
2,000 year old book. Gobbledegook is for the morons, not
those of us who
actually think.

You can see where Arnie's "I know the Truth, I will
instruct you in
it" attitude comes from :-)

**Poor ******* must be in constant conflict. He *claims*
to hold himself to scientific principles, yet maintains
that the supernatural is a normal part of life. He is, of
course, like all religious nutters, seriously deluded.

Arny applies science where he finds it appropriate, which is
pretty much where you would, were you capable.

For the rest, to which you are sadly oblivious, he applies
Christianity. Not my choice, but at least it's a start. His
church seems quite modern, which is a good sign. At least
he's not about to blow himself up.

Perhaps you're just upset coz you can't do prophecy?
Wouldn't you like to learn? Is small science all you want
from life?

Ian

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:34:13 +1000, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

You can see where Arnie's "I know the Truth, I will instruct you in
it" attitude comes from :-)

**Poor ******* must be in constant conflict. He *claims* to hold himself to
scientific principles, yet maintains that the supernatural is a normal part
of life. He is, of course, like all religious nutters, seriously deluded.

Faith sorta works if you leave it as faith. It's when it gets
obsessed with forensic analysis of the text, looking for reasons to
support the current dogma (and ignoring readings that DON'T support
it) that things get silly.

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message


**Poor ******* must be in constant conflict. He *claims*
to hold himself to scientific principles, yet maintains
that the supernatural is a normal part of life.

Is it a belief in the supernatural, or is it belief that current science
does not explain *everything*?

While modern science does a wonderful job of explaining very, very many
things including the vast realms of audio that escape Trevor's
understanding, I don't think that even Science itself claims to be able to
explain *everything*.

Isn't it true that one of the fundamental principles of science is that all
findings of Science are provisional, until more accurate findings are
obtained?

He is, of course, like all religious nutters, seriously deluded.

Intersting comment given all of the supernatural beliefs about audio that
Trevor has entertained Usenet with all these years.