![]() |
proms 320kbps
Surprised no-one else seems to have mentioned this here yet. :-)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/audioexperiment/ Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
proms 320kbps
Jim Lesurf wrote:
Surprised no-one else seems to have mentioned this here yet. :-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/audioexperiment/ There is a thread on alt.radio.digital. -- David Pitt |
proms 320kbps
Le 04/09/2010 18:46, David Pitt a écrit :
Jim Lesurf wrote: Surprised no-one else seems to have mentioned this here yet. :-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/audioexperiment/ There is a thread on alt.radio.digital. Jim, Perhaps you could use your vast influence at the Beeb [:-)] so that this "experiment" continues after the The Last Night! -- Froggy Blackadder: There's something wrong with your fiancée, sir. Melchett: Oh my God, she's not Welsh, is she? (Blackadder Goes Forth) |
proms 320kbps
In article , froggy
wrote: Le 04/09/2010 18:46, David Pitt a écrit : Jim Lesurf wrote: Surprised no-one else seems to have mentioned this here yet. :-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/audioexperiment/ There is a thread on alt.radio.digital. Jim, Perhaps you could use your vast influence at the Beeb [:-)] sic :-) so that this "experiment" continues after the The Last Night! TBH at present I've not decided if for me 320k gives a satisfactory trade-off between reliability of stream connection and quality. Dunno about you, but so far, each time I've tried the current experimental stream I get drop outs on average about once or twice an hour (about 1 sec lost each time) which rather disrupts listening to a long piece of music. Wheras at 128k or 192k I almost never get such dropouts. Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
proms 320kbps
On 09/09/2010 09:33, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In , froggy wrote: Le 04/09/2010 18:46, David Pitt a écrit : Jim wrote: Surprised no-one else seems to have mentioned this here yet. :-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/audioexperiment/ There is a thread on alt.radio.digital. Jim, Perhaps you could use your vast influence at the Beeb [:-)] sic :-) so that this "experiment" continues after the The Last Night! TBH at present I've not decided if for me 320k gives a satisfactory trade-off between reliability of stream connection and quality. Dunno about you, but so far, each time I've tried the current experimental stream I get drop outs on average about once or twice an hour (about 1 sec lost each time) which rather disrupts listening to a long piece of music. Wheras at 128k or 192k I almost never get such dropouts. Slainte, Jim Steve the digitalradiotech fella has just sent his round his email list, fyi etc: *** The BBC has launched an "experimental" 320 kbps AAC Internet stream carrying the Proms. The stream will be available until the Last Night of the Proms on Saturday 11th September, and the BBC would like people to listen to the stream while the Proms are on, then to provide feedback by filling in a short online questionnaire. As it is an extreme rarity for the BBC to care about the audio quality it delivers on digital radio, let alone experiment with a bit rate as high as 320 kbps, I would urge as many of you as possible to have a listen to this stream and to fill in the online questionnaire afterwards. The 320 kbps AAC stream can be found he http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/audioexperiment/ The online questionnaire is he http://ecustomeropinions.com/survey/...?sid=471224792 And a BBC Internet blog about the "extra high quality audio experiment" can be found he http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcintern...ity_audio.html *** |
proms 320kbps
In article , Rob
wrote: On 09/09/2010 09:33, Jim Lesurf wrote: Steve the digitalradiotech fella has just sent his round his email list, fyi etc: Thanks. FWIW I'd already had the same info from the BBC directly - ahem minus, of course, Steve's added opinions. :-) IIUC the survey and blog should also be findable from the URL I posted when I started this thread. I'd certainly encourage people to try it while they can and report their experience. Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
proms 320kbps
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:33:22 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote: In article , froggy wrote: Le 04/09/2010 18:46, David Pitt a écrit : Jim Lesurf wrote: Surprised no-one else seems to have mentioned this here yet. :-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/audioexperiment/ There is a thread on alt.radio.digital. Jim, Perhaps you could use your vast influence at the Beeb [:-)] sic :-) so that this "experiment" continues after the The Last Night! TBH at present I've not decided if for me 320k gives a satisfactory trade-off between reliability of stream connection and quality. Dunno about you, but so far, each time I've tried the current experimental stream I get drop outs on average about once or twice an hour (about 1 sec lost each time) which rather disrupts listening to a long piece of music. Wheras at 128k or 192k I almost never get such dropouts. Slainte, Jim How is your broadband connection though? I pay a little extra for the professional option from Plusnet. It guarantees maximum line bandwidth on all ports and services. I was downloading the latest TomTom Western Europe map the other day, and had the network monitor running to see how it was going. Here is what the monitor made of most of the transfer. http://www.soundthoughts.co.uk/look/adsl.png Rock solid 16Mb/sec and no dropouts. That is about 1GByte on that display. That makes light work of 320kb/sec. d |
proms 320kbps
"Don Pearce" wrote
How is your broadband connection though? I pay a little extra for the professional option from Plusnet. It guarantees maximum line bandwidth on all ports and services. That's all very well if you live close enough to the exchange. If, OTOH, you have 4km of overhead cable between you and the exchange (as I do) 16Mb/s is the stuff of fantasy. Just 10% of that would be a dream! David. |
proms 320kbps
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:41:07 +0100, "David Looser"
wrote: "Don Pearce" wrote How is your broadband connection though? I pay a little extra for the professional option from Plusnet. It guarantees maximum line bandwidth on all ports and services. That's all very well if you live close enough to the exchange. If, OTOH, you have 4km of overhead cable between you and the exchange (as I do) 16Mb/s is the stuff of fantasy. Just 10% of that would be a dream! David. You mean you wont move house just to increase your broadband speed? What kind of commitment is that? d |
proms 320kbps
In article , Don Pearce
wrote: On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:33:22 +0100, Jim Lesurf wrote: TBH at present I've not decided if for me 320k gives a satisfactory trade-off between reliability of stream connection and quality. Dunno about you, but so far, each time I've tried the current experimental stream I get drop outs on average about once or twice an hour (about 1 sec lost each time) which rather disrupts listening to a long piece of music. Wheras at 128k or 192k I almost never get such dropouts. Slainte, Jim How is your broadband connection though? Fast enough that I can normally watch the *TV* iPlayer without problems if wish. For reference I just checked using the BBC iplayer diagnostic and for both my laptop and shuttle this gave 2400 kbps for download speed and 2200 for streaming. I'd agree that isn't very fast. But it should be ample for 320k *provided* the connection streams reliably. I also use 256/320 from elsewhere at times. The problem can be with occasional brief delays. My guess is that this is simply a machine somewhere along the way being temporarily otherwise occupied or some packets going AWOL. Hence I suspect this is a matter of the levels of buffering/retries/requests not being quite adequate. Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk