A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Making a mono-from-stereo cable



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old September 9th 10, 11:30 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable

"Iain Churches" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Good point. Every Jute amplifier schematic I've seen
looked like it was copied from someplace.


Oh Arny! You are such a *nice* Christian.


And piling on like this somehow makes you better than me?

No, it makes you lower than me because you could have kept out of it.

Love ya Iain - you've never saw an opportunity to make trouble that you
could avoid.



  #32 (permalink)  
Old September 9th 10, 05:49 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Ian Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 300
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable

David Looser wrote:
"Ian wrote in message
...
John Byrns wrote:

There is only one logical way to connect the first two resistors, and
then seemingly only one place to connect the odd resistor, but what is
the point of including the third 10k resistor?



To provide some attenuation to get the 2V rms output closer to the 0.5V
rms input requirement.


If the idea is to prevent overload of the amplifier then the shunt resistor
should be a lot lower, 1.67k to be exact.

David.



The idea is not to prevent overload but rather to get the power amp volume control in more user
friendly region.

Cheers

Ian
  #33 (permalink)  
Old September 9th 10, 06:26 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Andre Jute[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable

On Sep 9, 9:39*am, "TonyL" wrote:
Andre Jute wrote:
Only two cycles of messages from an innocent question to the resident
circlejerk of mutual masturbators launching a full-scale personal
attack on the poster. Is anyone surprised that i treat this malicious
scum with open contempt? -- Andre Jute


Jute,

Just to delurk for a moment.....

Why not just wire the frigging resistors in and see what it sounds like ?

Would be much quicker than messing about in here.


I was deliberately making a simple talking point. That has succeeded.
There was also the salutary secondary effect of proving once more that
the self-appointed gatekeepers (the jerks I refer to collectively as
"the scum") keep out newbies by making any discussion personally
unpleasant. Who'd want to ask a question if you were treated as I've
been treated by Poopie Stevenson, "Eiron", that New Zealand jerk
Coatham (who actually had the effrontery to label his abuse as
"helpful"!), and the ever-wretched Krueger?

Andre Jute
Noblesse oblige
  #34 (permalink)  
Old September 9th 10, 06:33 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Arny Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,850
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable

"Andre Jute" wrote in message

Who'd want to ask a question if
you were treated as I've been treated by Poopie
Stevenson, "Eiron", that New Zealand jerk Coatham (who
actually had the effrontery to label his abuse as
"helpful"!), and the ever-wretched Krueger?


Trust me Andre, we save our *special treatment* for know-it-alls like you.

We give far better treatment to those who we recognize as being fellow
members of the human race. ;-)


  #35 (permalink)  
Old September 9th 10, 06:57 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Andre Jute[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable

On Sep 9, 6:59*am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message

...





Time to return to tech-talk.


In a modest-sized room (by horn standards anyway) I want to rig up a
singleton of my modded semi-Fidelio bicor horns for Lowther PM6A. I
thought I'd do the monoing in a specially made 1 metre cable between
the CD player and the power amp.


The QUAD CD expects to see at least 10K impedance on its outputs.
Output of the CD player is 2Vrms and about 0.5Vrms of that is required
to drive the amp to enough power to handle the horns, so high value
resistors can be used in the monomaker if there is any advantage to be
gained.


However, the sound is NOT intended to be reprocessed as stereo
downstream (home installation, not studio); if I want stereo again,
i'll just plug in a stereo cable.


The pot on the integrated amp is probably (the board won't be here
until Tuesday and i can't read the spec on the piccie) 50K Alps but I
can replace it with a DACT of which I have a good selection of values.


So what value resistors would you use for monoing?


How many? Only two, or three?


With your choice of values, what can I expect to lose from the monoing
in bandwidth as distinct from gain?


Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/
"wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio
constructor"
John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare
"an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of
wisdom"
Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review


Hello Andre.

Good to see you posting again.

I would try three R's *arranged as a Y, with the
top two arms (R=10K each) connected at the sources,
and the bottom leg (R=2k2) to ground,
with the mono output taken from the junction of
the three resistors.


I don't get this, Iain. You and David both want a low value resistor
shunted to ground. But it seems to me you're looking backward to the
series resistors whereas the important direction is forwards to the
unknown pot, with which the shunt resistor will be in parallel. If the
shunt resistor is low, the parallel combination will be grotesquely
low.

In the prototype you could make the 2k2 a
trimmer, *to allow you to adjust the attenuation
precisely, and then replace it with the equivalent
fixed value resistor.


Nice touch. However, precision isn't all that important; we just want
to be in the ballpark of not overloading the speaker.

Andre Jute
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/Andre%20Jute's%20Utopia%20Kranich.pdf
  #36 (permalink)  
Old September 10th 10, 01:55 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Paul G.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable

On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:57:28 -0700 (PDT), Andre Jute
wrote:

On Sep 9, 6:59*am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message

......[snip!].....

In a modest-sized room (by horn standards anyway) I want to rig up a
singleton of my modded semi-Fidelio bicor horns for Lowther PM6A. I
thought I'd do the monoing in a specially made 1 metre cable between
the CD player and the power amp.


The QUAD CD expects to see at least 10K impedance on its outputs.
Output of the CD player is 2Vrms and about 0.5Vrms of that is required
to drive the amp to enough power to handle the horns, so high value
resistors can be used in the monomaker if there is any advantage to be
gained.


However, the sound is NOT intended to be reprocessed as stereo
downstream (home installation, not studio); if I want stereo again,
i'll just plug in a stereo cable.


The pot on the integrated amp is probably (the board won't be here
until Tuesday and i can't read the spec on the piccie) 50K Alps but I
can replace it with a DACT of which I have a good selection of values.


So what value resistors would you use for monoing?


How many? Only two, or three?


With your choice of values, what can I expect to lose from the monoing
in bandwidth as distinct from gain?


Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/
"wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio
constructor"
John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare
"an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of
wisdom"
Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review


Hello Andre.

Good to see you posting again.

I would try three R's *arranged as a Y, with the
top two arms (R=10K each) connected at the sources,
and the bottom leg (R=2k2) to ground,
with the mono output taken from the junction of
the three resistors.


I don't get this, Iain. You and David both want a low value resistor
shunted to ground. But it seems to me you're looking backward to the
series resistors whereas the important direction is forwards to the
unknown pot, with which the shunt resistor will be in parallel. If the
shunt resistor is low, the parallel combination will be grotesquely
low.

In the prototype you could make the 2k2 a
trimmer, *to allow you to adjust the attenuation
precisely, and then replace it with the equivalent
fixed value resistor.


Nice touch. However, precision isn't all that important; we just want
to be in the ballpark of not overloading the speaker.

Andre Jute
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/Andre%20Jute's%20Utopia%20Kranich.pdf


The value seems rather low, but let's figure it out with a few
assumptions:
1- impedance (looking back into CD player) is low - quite valid if
it has considerable feedback.
2- Both channels are going full out (2V), and both have identical
signals (worst case scenario for highest mono output level)
3- 10K (or so) are recommended resistors that "Y" the two CD player
outputs.
4- the impedance of the amp is very high

Effectively, your signal source appears as 2v in series with 5K. To
attenuate the signal to 0.5 volts, Vout/Vin for your attenuator is
0.25, and the resistor to ground works out to about 1.66K .
But.... assumption 1 is probably not valid, and 4 isn't either
(input pot). So with a bit of juggling of values, I'd say that 2-2.5k
is quite reasonable, as suggested above.
The other consideration is that you may get recordings that will not
put out the maximum 2V (they don't always max out just shy of the
maximum possible from the DAC circuits). In such cases you won't be
able to run your system full out, whereas if you had more of a gain
margin you could get it. That would suggest even higher values for the
resistor to ground, or even no resistor to ground.
On the other hand, since it takes a factor or 10 times the power to
sound twice as loud, I don't think it's going to make a big difference
to the sound level if the resistor to ground varies a bit. If I were
you, my primary concern would be if someone (like the kids) turn
everything up full out, then you could burn out your speakers. In that
case, I'd use the 1.66K (or thereabouts) to be on the safe side.
Are your horns rated for continuous RMS (rare for home systems) or
some other standard where there is a peak level for a short duration?
If the latter, I would be much more worried if I were you, especially
if they are expensive or "one of a kind". If your speakers are rated
for short peak levels, the above calculations would not be
conservative enough.
Getting somewhat off topic, what is the best way to protect a
speaker from destruction if the amp is sufficiently powerful, and you
have no control over volume? It happens.... the kids have fun with
your stereo, the grounds come loose on the inputs (huge buzz), the
system oscillates, etc.


Paul G.
  #37 (permalink)  
Old September 10th 10, 07:47 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Iain Churches[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,648
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable


"Andre Jute" wrote in message
...
On Sep 9, 6:59 am, "Iain Churches" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message

...





Time to return to tech-talk.


In a modest-sized room (by horn standards anyway) I want to rig up a
singleton of my modded semi-Fidelio bicor horns for Lowther PM6A. I
thought I'd do the monoing in a specially made 1 metre cable between
the CD player and the power amp.


The QUAD CD expects to see at least 10K impedance on its outputs.
Output of the CD player is 2Vrms and about 0.5Vrms of that is required
to drive the amp to enough power to handle the horns, so high value
resistors can be used in the monomaker if there is any advantage to be
gained.


However, the sound is NOT intended to be reprocessed as stereo
downstream (home installation, not studio); if I want stereo again,
i'll just plug in a stereo cable.


The pot on the integrated amp is probably (the board won't be here
until Tuesday and i can't read the spec on the piccie) 50K Alps but I
can replace it with a DACT of which I have a good selection of values.


So what value resistors would you use for monoing?


How many? Only two, or three?


With your choice of values, what can I expect to lose from the monoing
in bandwidth as distinct from gain?


Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/
"wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio
constructor"
John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare
"an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of
wisdom"
Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review


Hello Andre.


Good to see you posting again.


I would try three R's arranged as a Y, with the
top two arms (R=10K each) connected at the sources,
and the bottom leg (R=2k2) to ground,
with the mono output taken from the junction of
the three resistors.


I don't get this, Iain. You and David both want a low value resistor
shunted to ground. But it seems to me you're looking backward to the
series resistors whereas the important direction is forwards to the
unknown pot, with which the shunt resistor will be in parallel. If the
shunt resistor is low, the parallel combination will be grotesquely
low.


My idea was to use a Y pad to attenuate the signal so that you
would be able to use the pot at 2 o'clock instead of just-about-off-
the-stop.

In the prototype you could make the 2k2 a
trimmer, to allow you to adjust the attenuation
precisely, and then replace it with the equivalent
fixed value resistor.


Nice touch. However, precision isn't all that important; we just want
to be in the ballpark of not overloading the speaker.


If I were going to make a bespoke cable, I would consider it
a minor additional task to build in precisely the attenuation
needed.

Many classical CD's still follow the early (and prudent) practice
or peaking at -10dBFS, but a huge amount of pop material
is heavily compressed at 0dBFS. I know from earlier discussion
with you, that your music taste is hardly likely to include the
latter, but there might be someone else in the house to whom this
kind of music appeals.

Best regards
Iain





  #38 (permalink)  
Old September 10th 10, 07:48 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Iain Churches[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,648
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Andre Jute" wrote in message

Who'd want to ask a question if
you were treated as I've been treated by Poopie
Stevenson, "Eiron", that New Zealand jerk Coatham (who
actually had the effrontery to label his abuse as
"helpful"!), and the ever-wretched Krueger?


Trust me Andre, we save our *special treatment* for know-it-alls like you.


We?

We give far better treatment to those who we recognize as being fellow
members of the human race. ;-)


We?

The use of the personal pronoun in the 1st person plural
is reserved for:

1. Those who speak on behalf of others.
2. Royalty.

Despite what you may wish us to believe, Arny,
you qualify in neither category:-)

Iain






  #39 (permalink)  
Old September 10th 10, 07:51 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
Iain Churches[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,648
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Iain Churches" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Good point. Every Jute amplifier schematic I've seen
looked like it was copied from someplace.


Oh Arny! You are such a *nice* Christian.


And piling on like this somehow makes you better than me?


I am hard-pressed to think of a single person whom
I do not consider to be better than you:-)


No, it makes you lower than me because you could have kept out of it.



So you want me to stand by, while you cast aspersions
upon one of the most helpful and interesting contributors
to Usenet tube-audio discussion?

Not a chance!


Iain







  #40 (permalink)  
Old September 10th 10, 08:18 AM posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio
David Looser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,883
Default Making a mono-from-stereo cable

"Iain Churches" wrote

So you want me to stand by, while you cast aspersions
upon one of the most helpful and interesting contributors
to Usenet tube-audio discussion?

Not a chance!


If by "one of the most helpful and interesting contributors...." you mean
Andre Jute, it seems to me that his intent in posting his original
"question" here was entirely malicious. He asked a question that he clearly
already knew the answer to, and then responded to the replies in the most
obnoxious way.

I cannot understand why you would defend someone who behaves like that.

David.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.