http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf
--
Tony Sayer

tony sayer wrote:

http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf

Are you sure you're not biased? ;-)

The amazing thing is that, presumably, this works as a business.

Chris
--
Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK


Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh.

On 12/05/2011 09:35, Chris J Dixon wrote:
tony sayer wrote:

http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf

Are you sure you're not biased? ;-)

The amazing thing is that, presumably, this works as a business.


I'd guess so. A quick google round suggests that Bill Low is, er,
evangelical about his beliefs, with some pretty good PR to set them out.
Just the thing to indulge the rich.

Rob

On Thu, 12 May 2011 07:55:27 +0100, tony sayer
wrote:


http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf

It is actually impossible to reply to gibberish like that. If he were
talking sense, but simply in error, it would be possible. But this - I
have nothing...

d

In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 07:55:27 +0100, tony sayer wrote:


http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf

It is actually impossible to reply to gibberish like that. If he were
talking sense, but simply in error, it would be possible. But this - I
have nothing...

I haven't been able to decide to what extent it makes mountains out of
molehills, simply misunderstands the polarisability of a dielectric, or is
sheer technobabble!

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

On 12/05/2011 6:55 p.m., tony sayer wrote:

http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf

Of the 8 pages in the link, pages 6 and 7 show the most logical & rational
explanation of the theory.
If you disregard all the other pages they make complete sense.

On Fri, 13 May 2011 08:32:44 +1200, Mike Coatham
wrote:

On 12/05/2011 6:55 p.m., tony sayer wrote:

http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf

Of the 8 pages in the link, pages 6 and 7 show the most logical & rational
explanation of the theory.
If you disregard all the other pages they make complete sense.

Well, 8 wasn't too bad, but otherwise you are right.

d

On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:26:21 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 07:55:27 +0100, tony sayer wrote:


http://www.servo.lv/images/productsV...114754.DBS.pdf

It is actually impossible to reply to gibberish like that. If he were
talking sense, but simply in error, it would be possible. But this - I
have nothing...

I haven't been able to decide to what extent it makes mountains out of
molehills, simply misunderstands the polarisability of a dielectric, or is
sheer technobabble!

Slainte,

Jim

50% of each of the three, I would say.

d