A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 2nd 11, 03:45 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011

Hi,

Just to let people know that I've just put up a new page of results. These
compare the BBC iPlayer with the audio on DAB and TV for the Proms this
year. No surprise that I prefer the iPlayer. But some of the other results
were unexpected!

You can find the new page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/BBC/Proms...ulesAgain.html

Cheers,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 2nd 11, 04:19 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
David Looser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,883
Default iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011

"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...
Hi,

Just to let people know that I've just put up a new page of results. These
compare the BBC iPlayer with the audio on DAB and TV for the Proms this
year. No surprise that I prefer the iPlayer. But some of the other results
were unexpected!

You can find the new page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/BBC/Proms...ulesAgain.html

Cheers,

Jim

Interesting stuff, thanks.

BTW the line-scan frequency of 625-line TV is 15,625Hz. You refer to the
spike which can be seen to be at this frequency from the graph, yet in the
text you add 1000hz to it to make 16,625Hz.

David.


  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 2nd 11, 04:51 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011

In article , David Looser
wrote:
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...
Hi,

Just to let people know that I've just put up a new page of results.
These compare the BBC iPlayer with the audio on DAB and TV for the
Proms this year. No surprise that I prefer the iPlayer. But some of
the other results were unexpected!

You can find the new page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/BBC/Proms...ulesAgain.html

Cheers,

Jim

Interesting stuff, thanks.


BTW the line-scan frequency of 625-line TV is 15,625Hz. You refer to the
spike which can be seen to be at this frequency from the graph, yet in
the text you add 1000hz to it to make 16,625Hz.


Oops! I'll correct that.

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 2nd 11, 06:53 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
tony sayer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,042
Default iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011

In article , Jim Lesurf
scribeth thus
Hi,

Just to let people know that I've just put up a new page of results. These
compare the BBC iPlayer with the audio on DAB and TV for the Proms this
year. No surprise that I prefer the iPlayer.


Landline by another name..

But some of the other results
were unexpected!


Interesting but do we know what the signal paths were and what else was
in them transcoding anywhere perhaps?.. Even an Optimod set to classical
protect or similar?..

Can't say I've heard any singing light bulbs at all;! I've heard of some
florescent ones emitting UHF signals..

All in all the few proms I attended this year were excellent
sounding...



You can find the new page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/BBC/Proms...ulesAgain.html

Cheers,

Jim


--
Tony Sayer




  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 3rd 11, 08:19 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011

In article , tony sayer

wrote:
In article , Jim Lesurf
scribeth thus
Hi,

Just to let people know that I've just put up a new page of results.
These compare the BBC iPlayer with the audio on DAB and TV for the
Proms this year. No surprise that I prefer the iPlayer.


Landline by another name..


But some of the other results were unexpected!


Interesting but do we know what the signal paths were and what else was
in them transcoding anywhere perhaps?.. Even an Optimod set to classical
protect or similar?..


The reply involves me using the word 'source' in two ways...

My source(s) at the BBC (i.e. the people there who've helped with this)
tell me as follows, IIUC...

That the R3 24bit 48k from RAH comes into the central distribution desk,
then gets split there for iPlayer, FM, DAB, and the versions of R3 on 'TV'.
So common mode to that point. BBC4 TV also uses that feed. *But BBC1/2
don't*

The FM gets optimod and then is NICAM to the TXs.

The DAB goes into the DAB mp2 coder and then multiplexed out. That has a
gain adjust set. But no optimod. The filtering is part of the encoding.
(One of the things that I found out during this was the decision to lift
the level on DAB. Whereas on iPlayer they shy away from about -4dBFS.)

The iPlayer goes direct to Coyopa (iPlayer server) and sent (and saved for
'listen again' as the input LPCM at first). No processing beyond sample
rate (and perhaps level) conversion as part of the AAC encoding setup.

So in each case the splits are when any resampling (e.g. to 32k for FM) and
encoding is done.

The R3 for 'TV' gets sent to the TV people. So far as I know that just gets
mp2 encoded with the filtering as part of the encoding.

The TV side is more complex, and varies from BBC1 to BBC2 to BBC4.

BBC1 and 2 take their own feed from the hall, and may well have their own
balancing, etc. So a change may be imposed almost anywhere along the path
that the TV side use. From mics in the hall, onwards. It could be their
optimud sic, or something else...

Given this, no surprise that the BBC1/2 sound *was* different to R3. But
the puzzle is the strange 'peaks and dips' behaviour with a period that is
log-uniform! If it were different hall acoustics caused by different
balancing or mic placement I'd still be puzzled by the log-uniform pattern
being so clear. Weird.

I was also given a copy from 'source' - i.e. the same desk. But this was
resampled there to 16/44.1 to match my main target - iPlayer.

So far as I can tell, the resampling is done well. And the iPlayer output
is very close to the 'source' version.

But I can't say why the TV version has the odd behaviour. It could be a
quirk with the way the TV side process the sound. No idea. I can't tell if
the level compression is automated or simply someone with a score twiddling
the faders.

It doesn't appear when I compare iPlayer with source. What causes it, and
where in the chain, I have no idea. My source(s) at the BBC are also
puzzled. If I/they suddenly have a brainwave and twig the cause, I'll say
so.

It may be something wrong with my analysis. But, if so, we have no idea
what! So at present it remains a puzzle.

When I get a chance I may see if I can do a similar comparison for one of
the proms broadcast on BBC4 TV to see if that is 'clean'.

But at present I'm immersed in a load of research on a more 'historic'
topic. The development of the BBC FM distribution, NICAM, stereo, etc.

Having reported on the continued use of NICAM in HFN the reaction of some
readers was surprise/disbelief. That made me decide to check, and then led
me to wondering about the history of PCM and NICAM for FM distribution as
many of the details are little-known or forgotten. At the time I didn't
realise what an extensive and interesting set of events lurked... Have
since been told a number of stories and details that I hope to relate in
due course. The more I learned, the more I've felt that the good work done
should be better known and appreciated. :-)

Can't say I've heard any singing light bulbs at all;! I've heard of some
florescent ones emitting UHF signals..


I've also caught the neons in an old Quad tuner interfering with its FM
reception!

I've not heard any bulbs for decades. But then I can't hear 15kHz any
more! I suspect that any bulbs that sing at lower frequencies are heard and
dealt with. But the ones at HF pass unnoticed. The levels are also pretty
low. So you need to integrate over a long series of FFTs to show them
clearly. In a way it is a testament to the AAC that it can reproduce them
so well, even though they are probably inaudble in normal listening.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 4th 11, 08:17 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
tony sayer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,042
Default iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011

Bits reduced

So far as I can tell, the resampling is done well. And the iPlayer output
is very close to the 'source' version.

But I can't say why the TV version has the odd behaviour. It could be a
quirk with the way the TV side process the sound. No idea. I can't tell if
the level compression is automated or simply someone with a score twiddling
the faders.

It doesn't appear when I compare iPlayer with source. What causes it, and
where in the chain, I have no idea. My source(s) at the BBC are also
puzzled. If I/they suddenly have a brainwave and twig the cause, I'll say
so.

It may be something wrong with my analysis. But, if so, we have no idea
what! So at present it remains a puzzle.


Be interesting if you could repeat that for another venue to see if its
RAH specific..


When I get a chance I may see if I can do a similar comparison for one of
the proms broadcast on BBC4 TV to see if that is 'clean'.

But at present I'm immersed in a load of research on a more 'historic'
topic. The development of the BBC FM distribution, NICAM, stereo, etc.

Having reported on the continued use of NICAM in HFN the reaction of some
readers was surprise/disbelief. That made me decide to check, and then led
me to wondering about the history of PCM and NICAM for FM distribution as
many of the details are little-known or forgotten. At the time I didn't
realise what an extensive and interesting set of events lurked... Have
since been told a number of stories and details that I hope to relate in
due course. The more I learned, the more I've felt that the good work done
should be better known and appreciated. :-)


Go and join in the TX list mail group its over on the MB21 website but
a few ex BBC types hang out there..

Can't say I've heard any singing light bulbs at all;! I've heard of some
florescent ones emitting UHF signals..


I've also caught the neons in an old Quad tuner interfering with its FM
reception!

I've not heard any bulbs for decades. But then I can't hear 15kHz any
more! I suspect that any bulbs that sing at lower frequencies are heard and
dealt with. But the ones at HF pass unnoticed. The levels are also pretty
low. So you need to integrate over a long series of FFTs to show them
clearly. In a way it is a testament to the AAC that it can reproduce them
so well, even though they are probably inaudble in normal listening.


Be interesting to have a hearing test, mine now shows up a slight HF
loss on the Left channel but then again I did fracture that side of the
skull in a fall the other year !..

Slainte,

Jim


--
Tony Sayer

  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 4th 11, 09:54 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman (News)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,872
Default iPlayer versus the rest - Proms 2011

In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote:
I've not heard any bulbs for decades. But then I can't hear 15kHz any
more! I suspect that any bulbs that sing at lower frequencies are heard
and dealt with. But the ones at HF pass unnoticed. The levels are also
pretty low. So you need to integrate over a long series of FFTs to show
them clearly. In a way it is a testament to the AAC that it can
reproduce them so well, even though they are probably inaudble in normal
listening.


Singing lights in a TV studio were pretty common. Most usually spots
rather than soft lights. A quick whack sometimes sorted them.

I can remember being mystified by a very strange sounding (occasionally)
radio link while doing location recording. It was an analogue Micron radio
mic with noise reduction circuitry being used to link the boom back to the
mixer. Made life much easier for the boom op than a cable. But when it
occurred we switched back to cable. Engineering checked out the radio link
many times but could never find any fault. It was even sent back to the
makers for checking. (Very difficult to do any investigation there and
then due to the pressures of production.)

Eventually turned out to be caused by an HMI light head producing high
levels of audio above the normal audio band. The mic picked it up and the
noise reduction processed it, but it was removed before getting to the
output. Or even possibly by the mixer, as it didn't show on the metering
even with the same mic cabled.

Further tests showed many of these lamps produced the same effect - but
not all. Sparks got rather fed up being told to change a lamp due to a
noise they couldn't hear. ;-)

--
*Time is the best teacher; unfortunately it kills all its students.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.